{"author":null,"canonical_references":[],"database_sha256":"8cfbe7284c6936871d57c02dc6aa63ebbdfd4722422d539dd9f716e46e91112e","date_end":null,"date_start":null,"edition_year":null,"id":"sermonindex-ecf-2809","native_reference":{"book_number":510,"chapter_from":2,"chapter_to":2,"system":"MyBible module coordinates (mapping unverified)","verse_from":13,"verse_to":13},"public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"verse-keyed-module-record","review_required":["English edition and exact text","author/work attribution","dating","verse mapping and citation kind","reuse and attribution","split author quotations and deduplicate"],"review_status":"unreviewed","source_html":"<p><b>Arator</b>: Also, the error that they are moved by new wine is, by allegorical reasoning, the truth—the intoxicating teaching of heaven has filled them from a fresh spring. New vessels have taken on new liquid and are not spoiled by the bitter [liquid] that filled the old vats, [the new vessels] drinking in from the vine which, with Christ as the cultivator, gave a banquet in words [and] from which those waters that he transformed are red, and he made the poor flavor of the [old] law boil in the books of the church.<br/><i>— ON THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 1</i></p><p><b>Bede</b>: But others mocking said: Because they are full of new wine. Though mocking, they testify mystically to the truth. For they are not filled with old wine, which failed at the wedding of the Church, but with the new wine of spiritual grace. For now the new wine had come into new wineskins, as the apostles, not in the oldness of the letter, but in the newness of the Spirit of God, resounded the great deeds (Rom. VII).<br/><i>— Commentary on Acts</i></p><p><b>Cyril of Jerusalem</b>: For in truth the wine was new, the grace of the New Testament. But this new wine was from a spiritual vine, which already had often borne fruit in the prophets and sprouted forth in the New Testament. For just as in the order of nature the vine, remaining ever the same, brings forth new fruit according to the seasons, so too the same Spirit, remaining what he is, having wrought in the prophets, now manifested something new and marvelous. His grace had indeed been granted to the fathers in times past, but now it came in superabundance; in their case they received a share of the Holy Spirit, now they were baptized in all fullness.<br/><i>— Catechetical Lecture 17.18</i></p><p><b>Oecumenius</b>: There were also some of those who understood, perhaps the baser sort, mocking the rites as if they were the products of drunkenness; for if they had not understood, they would not have attributed the matter to drunkenness. But if they understood what was being said, you will ask, how did they dare to mock? Yet malice, arising from excessive wickedness, is nothing other than sheer perversion, so that, finding nothing else, it rips the present affair into whatever it can. As when Christ performed miracles, they had no doubt about the power at work, yet the thing was madly ascribed to Beelzebul. And nations are remembered as enemies of the Jews, Cretans, Arabs, and others, who, speaking in their tongues, afforded a sign that they would hold by faith; and everywhere wickedness accompanies virtue. The devout ones marveled, but the others mocked. See, then, the folly of those who mock.</p><p>They say they are full with sweet wine. And yet it was not the season for that. For it was Pentecost, when there is no sweetness. For the sweetness chiefly is the sweet-flowing wine from the very press. But it was also the third hour, at which one is unlikely to become drunk, and especially when people are in danger and fear. Therefore they label the whole according to its kind, saying, \"they were full of sweet wine.\" For the blunt speech seeks only one thing, to say anything at all, not how to say something with sense. The more astonishing thing was that, though those who marveled and confessed were Jews, Romans, proselytes, and almost all the nations proclaimed that they were speaking in their own languages, yet some were found mocking.</p><p>In another way. To claim that the apostles were filled with sweet wine is to slander them with regard to their character. For \"sweet wine\" is the sweet kind of wine, which is also more inclined to make one drunk, and by the slipperiness of its sweetness causes a more copious filling of the cavities of the brain with the vaporous exhalation. Did those who laughed at what was said understand it, or not? For if they did not understand, their mockery would have no point, for why should someone be grievously upset over a meaningless, senseless babble offered at random? But it is clear that they did understand, and that those who were cast into wonder held this matter in contempt. They themselves wickedly persistently snooped about it, as is the habit of wrongdoers.</p><p>In another way. They understood, but they were not pleased with what was said. For the speaker was attributing great works to God. For it is the custom of many, when they do not like what is said, to regard the speaker as demon-possessed or deranged. Therefore, also in the case of Christ: they understood the miracles and that he ought to be praised, but they slandered him as it being done by Beelzebul. (see Mark 3:22-30)<br/><i>— Commentary on Acts</i></p>","source_html_sha256":"cd54a214273785c882bac9fd7de156612ba712f520d87604f47e8d01d134146a","source_module":"ECF","source_row_id":2809,"source_url":"https://www.sermonindex.net/commentary/ecf/","text_sha256":"03c8b4a4cbeb382d9d98c96744a4dc0847da1e5d5df5a594b2c2c22946cbf752","translator":null,"work":null}