{"author":null,"backreferences":[{"context_html":"<p>48. In the next place, he has gone on, with calumnious\r\nmouth, to abuse monasteries and monks, finding fault also with\r\nme, as having been the founder of this kind of life.<a id=\"FNanchor_1114_1114\"></a><a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_1114_1114\">[1114]</a> And\r\nwhat this kind of life really is he does not know at all, or\r\nrather, though it is perfectly well known throughout all the\r\nworld, he pretends that he is unacquainted with it. Then,\r\nasserting that I had said that Christ was the baptizer, he has\r\nalso added certain words from my epistle as though I had set\r\nthis forth as my own sentiment, when I had really quoted it\r\nas his and yours, as I will presently show clearly to the best\r\nof my ability.<a id=\"FNanchor_1115_1115\"></a><a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_1115_1115\">[1115]</a> Then he has endeavoured to show us, in many\r\nunnecessary words, that Christ does not baptize, but that baptism\r\nis administered in His name, at once in the name of the\r\nFather, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost; of which Trinity\r\nitself he has said, either because it was what he wished,\r\nor because it was all that he could say, that \"Christ is the\r\ncentre of the Trinity.\" In the next place, he has taken\r\noccasion of the names of the sorcerers Simon and Barjesus to\r\nvent against us what insults he thought fit. Then he goes\r\non, keeping in guarded suspense the case of Optatus of\r\nThamugas, that he might not be steeped in the odium that\r\narose from it, denying that either he or his party could have\r\npassed judgment upon him, and actually intimating in respect\r\nof him, that he was crushed in consequence of suggestions\r\nfrom myself.</p>","headings":["WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.","BOOK THIRD."],"marker_anchor":null,"paragraph_id":"pg45843-paragraph-727"}],"canonical_references":[],"date_end":null,"date_start":null,"deduplication_fingerprint":"703df7e606c65f1c8f49034079be6dfc29cf03d42067f2768333a746399f5057","edition_title":"Writings in Connection with the Donatist Controversy","edition_translators":["John Richard King"],"edition_year":1872,"explicit_reference_candidates":[],"headings":[],"id":"pg45843-Footnote_1115_1115","license_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html","public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"original-editor-translator-note","review_required":["work and recension attribution","original-work chronology","Bible reference numbering and citation kind","English edition rights and attribution"],"review_status":"needs_review","rights_evidence":"Provider catalog reports public domain in the USA. Title leaves identify J. R. King, T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1872; catalog identifies translator John Richard King (1835-1907). Gutenberg credits Internet Archive/American Libraries without an exact scan identifier. Full provider license preserved with acquired original; republication and per-work metadata remain unreviewed.","source_anchor":"Footnote_1115_1115","source_ebook":45843,"source_html":"<div class=\"footnote\">\n<p><a id=\"Footnote_1115_1115\"></a><a class=\"pginternal\" href=\"#FNanchor_1115_1115\"><span class=\"label\">[1115]</span></a> See c. xlv. sec. 54.</p></div>","source_sha256":"a7a04003f4d3c49eb73db6c5936713979fcecadd86884373a9914ac54373ac5b","source_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/45843/pg45843-images.html#Footnote_1115_1115","text_sha256":"55726980086e5cd7c215731c4e485eeaa6f2a567a2a268716d78d39c32888bd7","verified":false,"work_id":null}