{"author":"Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)","date_end":1886,"date_label":"1886 (historical English edition; transcription printing date uncertain)","date_start":1886,"edition_year":1886,"edition_year_basis":"Original ANF VIII title and copyright 1886; physical transcription printing date uncertain; original translator and contributor roles qualified","id":"ws-library-full-note:c2eb453022ce3e1687d9:cite_note-12","is_genuine_commentary_verified":false,"license_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Reusing_Wikisource_content","public_import_allowed":true,"publication_location":"source-library","record_type":"editorial-footnote","references":[],"rights_approved":true,"section":"Chapter uncertain, editorial note cite_note-12","semantic_kind_reviewed":false,"source_context":["But, not to dwell further on these matters, let the prophetess tell us concerning Alexander, who calls himself a martyr, with whom she joins in banqueting; who himself also is worshipped by many; whose robberies and other deeds of daring, for which he has been punished, it is not necessary for us to speak of, since the treasury has him in keeping. Which of them, then, condones the sins of the other? The prophet the robberies of the martyr, or the martyr the covetousness of the prophet? For whereas the Lord has said, “Provide not gold, nor silver, nor two coats a-piece,” these men have, on the flat contrary, transgressed the command by the acquisition of these forbidden things. For we shall show that those who are called among them prophets and martyrs obtain money not only from the rich, but also from the poor, from orphans and widows. And if they are confident that they are right in so doing, let them stand forward and discuss the point, in order that, if they be refuted, they may cease for the future so to transgress. For the fruits of the prophet must needs be brought to the test: for “from its fruit is the tree known.” But that those that desire it may become acquainted with what relates to Alexander, he was condemned by Æmilius Frontinus, proconsul at Ephesus, not on account of the name of Christ, but for the daring robberies he committed when he was already a transgressor. Afterwards, when he had spoken falsely of the name of the Lord, he was released, having deceived the faithful there; and even the brethren of his own district, from which he came, did not receive him, because he was a robber. Thus, those who wish to learn what he is, have the public treasury of Asia to go to. And yet the prophet, although he spent many years with him, knows forsooth nothing about him! By convicting “him,” we by his means clearly convict of misrepresentation the prophet likewise. We are able to prove the like in the case of many others besides. And if they are confident of their innocence, let them abide the test."],"source_library_url":"/library/c2eb453022ce3e1687d9/#ws-library-full-note:c2eb453022ce3e1687d9:cite_note-12","source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_VIII/Remains_of_the_Second_and_Third_Centuries/Apollonius#cite_note-12","translator":"Benjamin Plummer Pratten (original ANF VIII translator credit), Alexander Roberts (Edinburgh series editor), James Donaldson (Edinburgh series editor), Arthur Cleveland Coxe (American revision with prefaces and notes), Matthew Brown Riddle (American volume collaborator; individual note authorship unspecified)","verification":{"proof_file":"raw/review/source-library-note-batch-0064/proof-records.jsonl","proof_file_sha256":"a85b105353c0e261feb8daea5e12d8eb4af102efce8f9e933488229612d7af94","proof_record_id":"ws-library-full-note:c2eb453022ce3e1687d9:cite_note-12"},"verified":true,"work":"Apollonius","work_id":"ws-anf8-supported-1886-de2d6a9dcb7bdc00c91a460a"}