{"author":null,"backreferences":[{"context_html":"<p><span class=\"smcap\">Chap. xlvii.</span>—92. Natalis of Oea<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> said: \"It is not only I\r\nmyself who am present, but also Pompeius of Sabrata,<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> and\r\nDioga of Leptis Magna,<a id=\"FNanchor_610_610\"></a><a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> who commissioned me to represent\r\ntheir views, being absent indeed in body, but present in spirit,\r\nwho deliver this same judgment as our colleagues, that heretics\r\ncannot have communion with us, unless they have been baptized\r\nwith the baptism of the Church.\"</p>","headings":["WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.","BOOK SEVENTH."],"marker_anchor":null,"paragraph_id":"pg45843-paragraph-381"},{"context_html":"<p><span class=\"smcap\">Chap. xlvii.</span>—92. Natalis of Oea<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> said: \"It is not only I\r\nmyself who am present, but also Pompeius of Sabrata,<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> and\r\nDioga of Leptis Magna,<a id=\"FNanchor_610_610\"></a><a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> who commissioned me to represent\r\ntheir views, being absent indeed in body, but present in spirit,\r\nwho deliver this same judgment as our colleagues, that heretics\r\ncannot have communion with us, unless they have been baptized\r\nwith the baptism of the Church.\"</p>","headings":["WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.","BOOK SEVENTH."],"marker_anchor":null,"paragraph_id":"pg45843-paragraph-381"},{"context_html":"<p><span class=\"smcap\">Chap. xlvii.</span>—92. Natalis of Oea<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> said: \"It is not only I\r\nmyself who am present, but also Pompeius of Sabrata,<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> and\r\nDioga of Leptis Magna,<a id=\"FNanchor_610_610\"></a><a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_610_610\">[610]</a> who commissioned me to represent\r\ntheir views, being absent indeed in body, but present in spirit,\r\nwho deliver this same judgment as our colleagues, that heretics\r\ncannot have communion with us, unless they have been baptized\r\nwith the baptism of the Church.\"</p>","headings":["WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.","BOOK SEVENTH."],"marker_anchor":null,"paragraph_id":"pg45843-paragraph-381"}],"canonical_references":[],"date_end":null,"date_start":null,"deduplication_fingerprint":"2e625ad4d59c7eac77b5f9dad0d365e261d9cc62c1771d9fbe4bdb29d25a4cf6","edition_title":"Writings in Connection with the Donatist Controversy","edition_translators":["John Richard King"],"edition_year":1872,"explicit_reference_candidates":[{"book":"1CO","chapter":5,"kind":"unreviewed","source_notation":"1 Cor. v. 4","verse":4,"verse_end":4}],"headings":[],"id":"pg45843-Footnote_610_610","license_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html","public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"original-editor-translator-note","review_required":["work and recension attribution","original-work chronology","Bible reference numbering and citation kind","English edition rights and attribution"],"review_status":"needs_review","rights_evidence":"Provider catalog reports public domain in the USA. Title leaves identify J. R. King, T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1872; catalog identifies translator John Richard King (1835-1907). Gutenberg credits Internet Archive/American Libraries without an exact scan identifier. Full provider license preserved with acquired original; republication and per-work metadata remain unreviewed.","source_anchor":"Footnote_610_610","source_ebook":45843,"source_html":"<div class=\"footnote\">\n<p><a id=\"Footnote_610_610\"></a><a class=\"pginternal\" href=\"#FNanchor_610_610\"><span class=\"label\">[610]</span></a> Sabrata, Oea, and Leptis Magna, were the three cities whose combination\r\ngave its name to Tripolis. The privilege of bishops to give their votes by proxy\r\nin a Council appears to have existed in very early times, and is perhaps referable\r\nto the example of St. Paul's interference in the Council of Achæan Bishops,\r\nthough absent in body, 1 Cor. v. 4.</p></div>","source_sha256":"a7a04003f4d3c49eb73db6c5936713979fcecadd86884373a9914ac54373ac5b","source_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/45843/pg45843-images.html#Footnote_610_610","text_sha256":"8486cc2bbaf258e219487770c0a753e1ba4d2f54f126843aa94618e87824ecde","verified":false,"work_id":null}