Testimonia

Publiek archief van verzamelde, gedownloade, ontdubbelde en geverifieerde teksten.
Overzicht / Records / versie

Versie

version_key: 511320be4f5537b456d80cc2afefe16fc6df5f39f9bb544c8a4d4c17e7666866
record: 670cdc05a230d8206214b13fecf64a01cd6d52d94bf9e94fdbea50a5b3af4e62 · work_id: ws-cyprian-anf5-cbdbd697a6d5f809d6e6 · origin: existing-publication-record

Metadata

{"author":"Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)","date_end":1886,"date_label":"1886 (historical English edition; transcription printing date uncertain)","date_start":1886,"edition_year":1886,"edition_year_basis":"Original ANF V copyright 1886; physical transcription printing date uncertain","id":"ws-library-full-note:cbdbd697a6d5f809d6e6:cite_note-36","is_genuine_commentary_verified":false,"license_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Reusing_Wikisource_content","public_import_allowed":true,"publication_location":"source-library","record_type":"editorial-footnote","references":[],"rights_approved":true,"section":"Chapter uncertain; original source section: Part 83, editorial note cite_note-36","semantic_kind_reviewed":false,"source_context":["Scrivener says candidly, “It is hard to believe that 1 John v. 7 was not cited by Cyprian;” and again, “The African writers Vigilius of Thapsus (at the end of the fifth century) and Fulgentius (circa 520) in two places expressly appeal to the three heavenly Witnesses.” So, too, Victor Vitensis, in the notable case of the African king of the Vandals. The admission of Tischendorf is also cited by Scrivener. Tischendorf says, “Gravissimus est Cyprianus (in Tract. de Eccles. Unitate), Dicit Dominus, Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joann. x. 30); et, iterum, de Patre, Filio, et Spiritu Sancto, scriptum est, Et tres unum sunt.” Tischendorf adds the testimony of this epistle to Jubaianus. And Scrivener decides that “it is surely safer and more candid to admit that Cyprian read it in his copies, than to resort to,” etc., the usual explainings away. To this note of this same erudite scholar the reader may also turn for satisfaction as to the reasons against authenticity. But primarily, to meet questions as to versions used by Cyprian, let him consult the same invaluable work (p. 269) on the Old Latin before Jerome. I have added an important consideration in a note to the Anonymous Treatise on Baptism, which follows (infra), with other documents, in our Appendix."],"source_library_url":"/library/cbdbd697a6d5f809d6e6/#ws-library-full-note:cbdbd697a6d5f809d6e6:cite_note-36","source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_V/Cyprian/The_Epistles_of_Cyprian/Part_83#cite_note-36","translator":"Robert Ernest Wallis (translator), Alexander Roberts (series editor), James Donaldson (series editor), Arthur Cleveland Coxe (American edition editor)","verification":{"proof_file":"raw/review/source-library-note-batch-0057/proof-records.jsonl","proof_file_sha256":"b9f615c66eafa7d4ea57647d1cf185165c893b00347fa7d29163806b197e9792","proof_record_id":"ws-library-full-note:cbdbd697a6d5f809d6e6:cite_note-36"},"verified":true,"work":"The Epistles of Cyprian","work_id":"ws-cyprian-anf5-cbdbd697a6d5f809d6e6"}

Referentiemetadata

[]

source: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Ante-Nicene_Fathers/Volume_V/Cyprian/The_Epistles_of_Cyprian/Part_83#cite_note-36

Plaatsingen (1)

InputOrdinalRecordPayload
9$.records[364]670cdc05a230d8206214b13fecf64a01cd6d52d94bf9e94fdbea50a5b3af4e62642b575892da34601b4643f22ef43ab73ef6f79b0f0667311132292172143d4d

Terug naar record