{"author":null,"canonical_references":[],"database_sha256":"8cfbe7284c6936871d57c02dc6aa63ebbdfd4722422d539dd9f716e46e91112e","date_end":null,"date_start":null,"edition_year":null,"id":"sermonindex-ecf-2165","native_reference":{"book_number":680,"chapter_from":1,"chapter_to":1,"system":"MyBible module coordinates (mapping unverified)","verse_from":17,"verse_to":17},"public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"verse-keyed-module-record","review_required":["English edition and exact text","author/work attribution","dating","verse mapping and citation kind","reuse and attribution","split author quotations and deduplicate"],"review_status":"unreviewed","source_html":"<p><b>Gregory the Dialogist</b>: And there were certain ones who said that the second Epistle of Peter, in which the Epistles of Paul are praised, was not his. But if they had been willing to weigh the words of that Epistle, they could have thought far otherwise. For in it is written: \"A voice came down to him of this kind from the magnificent glory: This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.\" And it is added: \"And we heard this voice when we were with him on the holy mountain.\" Let them therefore read the Gospel, and they will immediately recognize that when that voice came from heaven, the Apostle Peter stood on the mountain with the Lord. Therefore he himself wrote this Epistle who heard this voice concerning the Lord on the mountain.<br/><i>— Homilies on Ezekiel, Book 2, Homily 6</i></p><p><b>Hilary of Arles</b>: The one who received glory and honor was not inferior to the one who bestowed these things, because it was in his human flesh that the Son received them, not in his eternal divinity.<br/><i>— INTRODUCTORY COMMENTARY ON 2 PETER</i></p><p><b>Oecumenius</b>: Furthermore, here through the things that are now proposed. \"For he received from God the Father.\" This participle λαδὼν is either placed in the position of the indicative verb ἔλαδεν, that is, he received: since according to the consequence of the participle, the discourse does not subsequently correspond. Or if this is not pleasing, but someone wishes to take λαδὼν as a proper participle, the discourse will necessarily fall into disorder: if, however, the participle is taken in place of the indicative verb, it will be consistent with what is added, for example: For he received glory from God the Father: and from this we have more firmly whatever has been announced about this by the prophets before: not that any prophecy was delivered from the voice of the Father from on high, but that we have been confirmed by the heavenly voice of the Father which testified that he is the Son, so that all the prophecy of the prophets undoubtedly carries testimony from the Father.<br/>\"Here is my beloved Son.\" (Matt. 3:17) Three times the Father testified to the Son: at baptism, at the passion when He said, \"And I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again\" (Jn. 12:28); and on the holy mountain.<br/><i>— Commentary on 2 Peter</i></p>","source_html_sha256":"627f190307485ac7d6d32c01d2f82016aeb4a0dac259e90653a6aadc4d7e67f0","source_module":"ECF","source_row_id":2165,"source_url":"https://www.sermonindex.net/commentary/ecf/","text_sha256":"61d793da9d2b560a97717c56648869a1661b70af2f9b0d98ac235049b9f758f8","translator":null,"work":null}