{"author":null,"canonical_references":[],"database_sha256":"8cfbe7284c6936871d57c02dc6aa63ebbdfd4722422d539dd9f716e46e91112e","date_end":null,"date_start":null,"edition_year":null,"id":"sermonindex-ecf-3191","native_reference":{"book_number":510,"chapter_from":6,"chapter_to":6,"system":"MyBible module coordinates (mapping unverified)","verse_from":9,"verse_to":9},"public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"verse-keyed-module-record","review_required":["English edition and exact text","author/work attribution","dating","verse mapping and citation kind","reuse and attribution","split author quotations and deduplicate"],"review_status":"unreviewed","source_html":"<p><b>Bede</b>: However, there arose some from the synagogue called the Libertines and Cyrenians, etc. And in the Greek text, the name Libertines is written. Now, libertini are called the sons of freedmen, that is, those who, after servitude, were freed and granted liberty. It is therefore evident that those who first rebelled against the faith of Christ were born of a servile stock; who, although they were emancipated from human masters, nonetheless did not cease to be slaves of sin. In their person, the most wicked persecutors of faith and all holiness, namely heretics, are fittingly portrayed, about whom Peter says: \"For speaking proud words of vanity, they lure in the lusts of the flesh those who have barely escaped, those who walk in error, promising them liberty, while they themselves are slaves of corruption\" (2 Peter 2). This servitude is, of course, opposed to the liberty of the Spirit, which the Bereans had, about whom it is said in praise while Paul and Silas preached: \"These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, who received the word with all eagerness, daily examining the Scriptures.\"<br/><i>— Retractions on Acts</i></p><p><b>John Chrysostom</b>: Again he uses the phrase of \"rising up\" to denote their exasperation and wrath. Here we have a great multitude. And observe the difference in the form of accusation: for since Gamaliel had stopped them from finding fault on the former plea, they bring in another charge. The synagogues were diverse: to wit, \"Of the Libertines\": \"of the Cyrenians, i.e. those in the parts beyond Alexandria, of the Alexandrians,\" etc. There also they seem to have had synagogues according to their different nations; for many stayed behind there, that they might not be obliged to be continually travelling. The Libertines perhaps were freedmen of the Romans. As there were many foreigners dwelling there, so they had their synagogues, where the Law was to be read.<br/><i>— Homily on Acts 15</i></p><p><b>Oecumenius</b>: He says that their frenzy and momentum rose again and that they were not only roused against themselves but also would soon debate and sophisticate with another crowd, perhaps Libertines, and Alexandrians, and Cyrenaicans, and Cilicians, and Asians. And just as the discussion proceeds through another crowd, so likewise the accusation through others, and the plot of tricksters and desperate men. For, being prevented by Gamaliel from attempting anything against the apostles, and having nothing to charge against them, they now attack Stephen with slander, having missed the debate held in the clubs of talkers, and he says they perhaps call the Romans Libertines, having styled themselves after Livia the wife of Augustus, since the woman was also visible and especially loved for her virtue by Augustus. Indeed she herself lived on in return, persistently attending upon the tomb of Augustus.<br/><i>— Commentary on Acts</i></p><p><b>Oecumenius</b>: In another way: the Libertines and Cyrenians from beyond Alexandria, since they were thought to surpass the Jews in sophistry. Therefore various synagogues were stationed in Jerusalem according to nations. And they had places set apart for the reading of the laws of Moses. For many of those who came up to Jerusalem to worship, especially at the Passover, which it was not lawful to celebrate outside Jerusalem, lodged there. So that, in order not to be compelled to emigrate from their homelands, they frequented Jerusalem and ministered there. The freedmen of the Romans were called Libertines. And when Stephen therefore despised them, as men hardened in heart and unwilling to converse, they, emboldened by their own vanity, were foremost in disputing with him. But to him alone, not to another, one thing: to bring shame upon the signs performed by him from envy, as if they might somehow place him in difficulty; and to those acting as representatives, out of ignorance; the other, that by diverting their discussion toward him they might keep him from attending to the signs. Therefore, when these things were present, and in addition they craftily introduced something against the law, so also all their zeal, he himself, having anticipated their craftiness, did this first, having launched a more combative attack upon them, and by the power of the divine Spirit and wisdom in him he shut them up in confusion; then, when they wanted to reply in a more puzzling fashion, so that they might not even then be intelligible. For this reason their proceedings already became more like robbery. And he himself most plainly attacked them through their desires. What was this? The abolition of the law. He did not say these things, but he routed them. For if he had spoken openly, they would not have needed false witnesses. Which outcome was the desired end for him, but for them he stored up destruction.<br/><i>— Commentary on Acts</i></p>","source_html_sha256":"50bf039fc92885b1473f85015ae6c56ef577c788f2677be5aa0f12dadc318ed8","source_module":"ECF","source_row_id":3191,"source_url":"https://www.sermonindex.net/commentary/ecf/","text_sha256":"89023fee7e923c174c493da6cdac01de235cac9273a886025ff93990c5971037","translator":null,"work":null}