7.  But the real reason of separation is not this letter.  There is another cause of alienation.  I am ashamed to mention it; and I would have been for ever silent about it had not recent events compelled me to publish all their mind for the sake of the good of the mass of the people.  Good men have thought that communion with me was a bar to the recovery of their authority.  Some have been influenced by the signature of a certain creed which I proposed to them, not that I distrusted their sentiments, I confess, but because I wished to do away with the suspicions which the more part of the brethren who agree with me entertained of them.  Accordingly, to avoid anything arising from that confession to prevent their being accepted by the present authorities, Though this phrase commonly means the reigning emperor, as in Letter lxvi., the Ben. note has no doubt that in this instance the reference is to Euzoius.  In Letter ccxxvi. § 3. q.v., Basil mentions reconciliation with Euzoius as the real object of Eustathius’s hostility.  Euzoius was now in high favour with Valens. they have renounced communion with me.  This letter was devised by an after-thought as a pretext for the separation.  A very plain proof of what I say is, that after they had denounced me, and composed such complaints against me as suited them, they sent round their letters in all directions before communicating with me.  Their letter was in the possession of others who had received it in the course of transmission and who were on the point of sending it on seven days before it had reached my hands.  The idea was that it would be handed from one to another and so would be quickly distributed over the whole country.  This was reported to me at the time by those who were giving me clear information of all their proceedings.  But I determined to hold my tongue until the Revealer of all secrets should publish their doings by plain and incontrovertible demonstration.