VII. There—the word is with you. Let
the slings be let go; let the syllogism be woven. Either He is
altogether Unbegotten, or else He is Begotten. If He is
Unbegotten, there are two Unoriginates. If he is Begotten, you
must make a further subdivision. He is so either by the Father or
by the Son. And if by the Father, there are two Sons, and they
are Brothers. And you may make them twins if you like, or the one
older and the other younger, since you are so very fond of the bodily
conceptions. But if by the Son, then such a one will say, we get
a glimpse of a Grandson God, than which nothing could be more
absurd. For my part however, if I saw the necessity of the
distinction, I should have
acknowledged the facts without fear of the names. For it does not
follow that because the Son is the Son in some higher relation
(inasmuch as we could not in any other way than this point out that He
is of God and Consubstantial), it would also be necessary to think that
all the names of this lower world and of our kindred should be
transferred to the Godhead. Or may be you would consider our God
to be a male, according to the same arguments, because he is called God
and Father, and that Deity is feminine, from the gender of the word,
and Spirit neuter, because It has nothing to do with generation; But if
you would be silly enough to say, with the old myths and fables, that
God begat the Son by a marriage with His own Will, we should be
introduced Irenæus. I.,
6. to the
Hermaphrodite god of Marcion and Valentinus It would seem that S.
Gregory commonly confused Marcion with Marcus, one of the leaders of
the Gnostic School of Valentinus. In another place he speaks of
the Æons of Marcion and Valentinus, evidently meaning Marcus; for
the system of Marcion is characterized by an entire absence of any
theory of Emanations (Æons). Similarly there is no trace in
Marcion of this notion of a hermaphrodite Deity, but there is something
very like it in the account of Marcus given by S. Irenæus.
who imagined these newfangled Æons.