Chapter 5.—Wisdom of More
Importance Than Eloquence to the Christian Teacher.
But as some men employ these
coarsely, inelegantly, and frigidly, while others use them with
acuteness, elegance, and spirit, the work that I am speaking of
ought to be undertaken by one who can argue and speak with wisdom,
if not with eloquence, and with profit to his hearers, even though
he profit them less than he would if he could speak with eloquence
too. But we must beware of the man who abounds in eloquent
nonsense, and so much the more if the hearer is pleased with what
is not worth listening to, and thinks that because the speaker is
eloquent what he says must be true. And this opinion is held even
by those who think that the art of rhetoric should be taught; for
they confess that “though wisdom without eloquence is of little
service to states, yet eloquence without wisdom is frequently a
positive injury, and is of service never.”
1937
If, then, the men who teach the
principles of eloquence have been forced by truth to confess this
in the very books which treat of eloquence, though they were
ignorant of the true, that is, the heavenly wisdom which comes down
from the Father of Lights, how much more ought we to feel it who
are the sons and the ministers of this higher wisdom! Now a man
speaks with more or less wisdom just as he has made more or less
progress in the knowledge of Scripture; I do not mean by reading
them much and committing them to memory, but by understanding them
aright and carefully searching into their meaning. For there are
who read and yet neglect them; they read to remember the words, but
are careless about knowing the meaning. It is plain we must set
far above these the men who are not so retentive of the words, but
see with the eyes of the heart into the heart of Scripture.
Better than either of these, however, is the man who, when he
wishes, can repeat the words, and at the same time correctly
apprehends their meaning.
8. Now it is especially necessary
for the man who is bound to speak wisely, even though he cannot
speak eloquently, to retain in memory the words of Scripture. For
the more he discerns the poverty of his own speech, the more he
ought to draw on the riches of Scripture, so that what he says in
his own words he may prove by the words of Scripture; and he
himself, though small and weak in his own words, may gain strength
and power from the confirming testimony of great men. For his
proof gives pleasure when he cannot please by his mode of speech.
But if a man desire to speak not only with wisdom, but with
eloquence also (and assuredly he will prove of greater service
if
he can do both), I would rather send him to read, and
listen to, and exercise himself in imitating, eloquent men, than
advise him to spend time with the teachers of rhetoric; especially
if the men he reads and listens to are justly praised as having
spoken, or as being accustomed to speak, not only with eloquence,
but with wisdom also. For eloquent speakers are heard with
pleasure; wise speakers with profit. And, therefore, Scripture
does not say that the multitude of the eloquent, but “the
multitude of the wise is the welfare of the world.”
1938
And as
we must often swallow wholesome bitters, so we must always avoid
unwholesome sweets. But what is better than wholesome sweetness
or sweet wholesomeness? For the sweeter we try to make such
things, the easier it is to make their wholesomeness serviceable.
And so there are writers of the Church who have expounded the Holy
Scriptures, not only with wisdom, but with eloquence as well; and
there is not more time for the reading of these than is sufficient
for those who are studious and at leisure to exhaust
them.
1937
Cicero,
de Inventione
Rhetorica
i. 1.
1938
Wisd. vi. 24
.