Epistle
LXVII.
To Quiricus, Bishop, &c.
Gregory to Quiricus, Bishop, and the other catholic bishops in Hiberia
183
.
Since to charity nothing is afar off, let those who are
divided in place be joined by letter. The bearer of these
presents, coming to the Church of the blessed Peter, Prince of the
apostles, asserted that he had received letters for us from your
Fraternity, and had lost them, with other things also, in the city of
Jerusalem. In them, as he says, you were desirous of enquiring
with regard to priests and people who have been bewildered in the error
of Nestorian heresy, when they return to the Catholic Church which is
the mother of all the elect, whether they should be baptized, or joined
to the bowels of the same mother
Church by confession only of the one true
faith.
And indeed we have learnt from the ancient
institution of the Fathers that whosoever among heretics are baptized
in the name of the Trinity, when they return to holy Church, may be
recalled to the bosom of mother Church either by unction of chrism, or
by imposition of hands, or by profession of the faith only. Hence
the West reconciles Arians to the holy Catholic Church by imposition of
hands, but the East by the unction of holy chrism. But
Monophysites and others are received by a true confession only, because
holy baptism, which they have received among heretics, then acquires in
them the power of cleansing, when either the former receive the Holy
Spirit by imposition of hands, or the latter are united to the bowels
of the holy and universal Church by reason of their confession of the
true faith. Those heretics, however, who are not baptized in the
name of the Trinity, such as the
Bonosiaci
and the
Cataphrygæ
, because the former do not believe in Christ the
Lord, and the latter with a perverse understanding believe a certain
bad man, Montanus, to be the Holy Spirit, like unto whom are many
others;—these, when they come to holy Church, are baptized,
because what they received while in their error, not being in the name
of the Holy Trinity, was not baptism. Nor can this be called an
iteration of baptism, which, as has been said, had not been given in
the name of the Trinity. But the Nestorians, since they are
baptized in the name of the Holy Trinity—though darkened by the
error of their heresy in that, after the manner of Jewish unbelief,
they believe not the Incarnation of the Only-begotten—when they
come to the Holy Catholic Church, are to be taught, by firm holding and
profession of the true faith, to believe in one and the same Son of God
and man, our Lord God Jesus Christ, the same existing in Divinity
before the ages, and the same made man in the end of the ages, because
The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us
(
Joh. i. 14
).
But we say that the Word was made flesh not by
losing what He was, but by taking what He was not. For in the
mystery of His Incarnation the Only-begotten of the Father increased
what was ours, but diminished not what was His. Therefore the
Word and the flesh is one Person, as He says Himself,
No man hath
ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son
of man which is in heaven
(
Joh. iii. 14
). He Who is the Son of God
in heaven was the Son of man who spoke on earth. Hence John says,
We know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an
understanding
(
1 Joh. v. 20
). And
as to what understanding He has given us, he straightway added,
That
we may know the true God.
Whom in this place does he mean as
the true God but the Father Almighty? But, as to what he
conceives also of the Almighty Son, he added, And that we may be in his
true Son Jesus Christ. Lo, he says that the Father is the true
God, and that Jesus Christ is His true Son. And what he conceives
this true Son to be he shews more plainly;
This is the true God, and
eternal life
. If, then, according to the error of Nestorius
the Word were one and the man Jesus Christ were another, he who is true
man would not be the true God and eternal life. But the
Only-begotten Son, the Word before the Ages, was made man. He is,
then, the true God and eternal life. Certainly, when the holy
Virgin was about to conceive Him, and heard the angel speaking to her,
she said,
Behold the hand-maid of the Lord; be it unto me according
to thy word
(
Luke i. 38
). And, when
she had conceived Him, and went to Elizabeth her kinswoman, at once she
heard,
Whence am I worthy that the mother of my Lord should come to
me?
Lo, the same Virgin is called both the handmaid and the
mother of the Lord. For she is the handmaid of the Lord, because
the Word before the Ages, the Only-begotten, is equal to the Father;
but the mother, because in her womb from the Holy Spirit and of her
flesh He was made man. Nor is she the handmaid of one and the
mother of another, because, when the Only-begotten of God, existing
before the ages, of her womb was made man, by an inscrutable miracle
she became both the handmaid of man by reason of the divinity and the
mother of the Word by reason of the flesh. It was not that the
flesh was first conceived in the womb of the Virgin, and the divinity
afterwards came into the flesh; but that as soon as the Word came into
the womb, immediately the Word, retaining the excellence of His own
nature, was made flesh. And the Only-begotten Son of God, through
the womb of the Virgin, was born a perfect man, that is, in verity of
flesh and of rational soul. Whence also He is called Anointed
above his fellows, as the Psalmist says,
God, thy God, hath anointed
thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows
(
Ps. xliv. 8
)
184
. For
He is anointed with oil, that is to say with the gift of the Holy
Spirit. But He was anointed above His fellows, because all we men
first exist as sinners, and afterwards are sanctified through the
unction of the Holy Spirit. But He Who, existing as God before
the ages, was conceived as man through the
Holy Spirit in the Virgin’s womb at the
end of the ages, was there anointed by the same Spirit, even where He
was conceived. Nor was He first conceived and afterwards
anointed; but to be conceived by the Holy Spirit of the flesh of the
Virgin was itself to be anointed by the Holy Spirit. This truth,
then, concerning His nativity let all who are brought back from the
perverse error of Nestorius confess before the holy congregation of
your Fraternity, anathematising the same Nestorius with all his
followers, and all other heresies. The venerable synods also
which the universal Church receives let them promise to receive and
venerate; and let your Holiness without any hesitation receive them in
your assembly, allowing them to retain their own orders, in order that,
while you both carefully sift the secrets of their hearts, and teach
them through true knowledge the right things they ought to hold, and in
gentleness make no difficulty or contradiction with them with respect
to their own orders, you may snatch them from the mouth of the ancient
foe; and that the retribution of eternal glory with Almighty God may
increase to you the more as you gather together many who may glory with
you in the Lord without end. Now may the Holy Trinity keep you in
its protection while you pray for us, and grant you in its love still
more manifold gifts.
[In
Colbert.
and
Collect. Paul
,
“Given on the tenth day of the Kalends of Jul. Indict.
4.”]
183
Or
Iberia
, corrected from
Hibernia
by the Benedictine
Editors, with the support of some few
mss.
That the letter was addressed to the bishops of
Hibernia (i.e. Ireland) is highly improbable. Not only is it
unlikely that the Eastern heresy of Nestorianism would have infected
Ireland, but the fact also, mentioned in the beginning of the letter,
that the messenger from the bishops addressed had passed through
Jerusalem on his way to Rome evidently points to some Eastern
locality. For similar reasons it cannot well be supposed that
Iberia
here denotes Spain. It may have been the territory
so-called in the neighbourhood of Armenia, between Cholchis on the
West, and Albania on the East, now
Gurgistan
.
184
xlv. 7.