9.  Men are like clouds, shifting hither and thither in the sky with the change of the winds. cf. Jude 12.  And of all men who have ever come within my experience these of whom I am speaking are the most unstable.  As to the other business of life, those who have lived with them may give evidence; but as to what is within my own knowledge, their inconsistency as regards the faith, I do not know that I have ever myself observed it or heard from any one else, of anything like it.  Originally they were followers of Arius; then they went over to Hermogenes, who was diametrically opposed to the errors of Arius, as is evinced by the Creed originally recited by him at Nicæa. cf. Letter lxxxi. p. 172.  Hermogenes was bishop of Cæsarea, in which see he preceded Dianius.  He acted as secretary at Nicæa, when yet a deacon.  “The actual creed was written out and read, perhaps in consideration of Hosius’ ignorance of Greek, by Hermogenes.”  (Stanley, Eastern Church, p. 140, ed. 1862.)  Hermogenes, fell asleep, and then they went over to Eusebius, the Coryphæus, as we know on personal evidence, of the Arian ring.  Leaving this, for whatever reasons, they came home again, and once more concealed their Arian sentiments.  After reaching the episcopate, to pass by what occurred in the interval, how many creeds did they put forth?  One at Ancyra; In 358, when the ὁμοιούσιον was accepted. another at Seleucia; In 359, when the Semiarians supported the Antiochene Dedication Creed of 341. another at Constantinople, In 360, when the Acacians triumphed, and Eustathius with other Semiarians were deposed.  The Creed of Ariminum, as revised at Nike, was accepted. the famous one; another at Lampsacus, In 364, when the Creeds of Ariminum and Constantinople were condemned by the Semiarians, and the Dedication Creed was reaffirmed. then that of Nike in Thrace; The Creed of Nike in Thrace was the Creed of Arminum revised, and it seems out of order to mention it after Lampsacus. and now again the creed of Cyzicus. In 375 or 6.  This is the formula referred to in Letter ccli. 4, as the latest.  On the variety of Creeds, cf. p. 48, n.  Of this last I know nothing, except that I am told that they have suppressed the homoousion, and are supporting the like in essence, while they subscribe with Eunomius the blasphemies against the Holy Spirit.  Although all of the creeds which I have enumerated may not be opposed to one another, yet they alike exhibit the inconsistency of the men’s minds, from their never standing by the same words.  I have said nothing as to countless other points, but this that I do say is true.  Now that they have gone over to you, I beg you to write back by the same man, I mean our fellow presbyter Strategius, whether you have remained in the same mind towards me, or whether you have been alienated in consequence of your meeting them.  For it was not likely that they would be silent, nor that you yourself, after writing to me as you have, would not use free speaking to them too.  If you remain in communion with me, it is well; it is what I would most earnestly pray for.  If they have drawn you over to them, it is sad.  How should separation from such a brother not be sad?  If in nothing else, at least in bearing losses like this, we have been considerably tried at their hands.