2.
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the
earth.”
Gen. i. 1. I stop struck
with admiration at this thought. What shall I first say?
Where shall I begin my story? Shall I show forth the vanity of
the Gentiles? Shall I exalt the truth of our faith? The
philosophers of Greece have made much ado to explain nature, and not
one of their systems has remained firm and unshaken, each being
overturned by its successor. It is vain to refute them; they are
sufficient in themselves to destroy one another. Those who were
too ignorant to rise to a knowledge of a God, could not allow that an
intelligent cause presided at the birth of the Universe; a primary
error that involved them in sad consequences. Some had recourse
to material principles and attributed the origin of the
Universe cf.
note on Letter viii. on the στοιχεῖα or
elements which the Ionian philosophers made the ἀρχαι of the universe.
Vide Plato, Legg. x. § 4 and Arist.,
Met. i. 3. to the elements of
the world. Others imagined that atoms, Posidonius the
Stoic names Moschus, or Mochus of Sidon, as the originator of the
atomic theory “before the Trojan period.”
Vide Strabo, xvi. 757. But the most famous
Atomists, Leucippus and Democritus of Abdera, in the 5th c.
b.c., arose in opposition to the Eleatic
school, and were followed in the 3d by Epicurus.
Vide Diog. Laert. ix. § 30, sq. and
Cicero, De Nat. Deor. i. 24–26. Ista
enim flagitia Democriti, sive etiam ante Leucippi, esse corpuscula
quædam lævia, alia aspera, rotunda alia, partim autem
angulata, curvata quædam, et quasi adunca; ex his effectum esse
cœlum atque terram, nulla cogente natura, sed concursu quodam
fortuito. Atqui, si haec Democritea non audisset, quid
audierat? quid est in physicis Epicuri non a Democrito? Nam,
etsi quædam commodavit, ut, quod paulo ante de inclinatione
atomorum dixi: tamen pleraque dixit eadem; atomos, inane,
imagines, infinitatem locorum, innumerabilitatemque mundorum eorum
ortus, interitus, omnia fere, quibus naturæ ratio
continetur.
and indivisible bodies, molecules and ducts, form, by their union, the
nature of the visible world. Atoms reuniting or separating,
produce births and deaths and the most durable bodies only owe their
consistency to the strength of their mutual adhesion: a true
spider’s web woven by these writers who give to heaven, to earth,
and to sea so weak an origin and so little consistency! It is
because they knew not how to say “In the beginning God created
the heaven and the earth.” Deceived by their inherent
atheism it appeared to them that nothing governed or ruled the
universe, and that was all was given up to chance. cf. the
Fortuna gubernans of Lucretius (v. 108). To guard us against this error the
writer on the creation, from the very first words, enlightens our
understanding with the name of God; “In the beginning God
created.” What a glorious order! He first establishes
a beginning, so that it might not be supposed that the world never had
a beginning. Then he adds “Created” to show that
which was made was a very small part of the power of the Creator.
In the same way that the potter, after having made with equal pains a
great number of vessels, has not exhausted either his art or his
talent; thus the Maker of the Universe, whose creative power, far from
being bounded by one world, could extend to the infinite, needed only
the impulse of His will to bring the immensities of the visible world
into being. If then the world has a beginning, and if it has been
created, enquire who gave it this beginning, and who was the
Creator: or rather, in the fear that human reasonings may make
you wander from the truth, Moses has anticipated enquiry by engraving
in our hearts, as a seal and a safeguard, the awful name of God:
“In the beginning God created”—It is He, beneficent
Nature, Goodness without measure, a worthy object of love for all
beings endowed with reason, the beauty the most to be desired, the
origin of all that exists, the source of life, intellectual light,
impenetrable wisdom, it is He who “in the beginning created
heaven and earth.”