Testimonia

Publiek archief van verzamelde en verwerkte bronrecords.
Overzicht / tekstblob

Tekstblob

sha256: b0ce9db4248bd7a931edb4893508a8a125a37b71874f60dbcb66d406dd659298 · 3,152 tekens

Chapter XVI.—Of the Derision Ascribed to the Robbers, and of the Question Regarding the Absence of Any Discrepancy Between Matthew and Mark on the One Hand, and Luke on the Other, When the Last-Named Evangelist States that One of the Two Mocked Him, and that the Other Believed on Him. 53. Matthew continues his narrative in these terms: “The robbers also, which were cru- cified with Him, cast the same in His teeth.”1428 Mark is quite in harmony with Matthew here, giving the same statement in different words.1429 On the other hand, Luke may be thought to contradict this, unless we be careful not to forget a certain mode of speech which is sufficiently familiar. For Luke’s narrative runs thus: “And one of the malefactors which were hanged railed on Him, saying, If thou be Christ, save thyself and us.”1430 And then the same writer proceeds to introduce into the same context the following recital: “But the other answering, rebuked him, saying, Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation? And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this man hath done nothing amiss. And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when Thou comest into Thy kingdom. And Jesus said unto him, Verily, I say unto thee, To-day thou shalt be with me in paradise.” 1431 The question then is, how we can reconcile either Mat- thew’s report, “The robbers also, which were crucified with Him, cast the same in His teeth,” or Mark’s, namely, “And they that were crucified with Him reviled Him,” with Luke’s testimony, which is to the effect that one of them reviled Christ, but that the other arrested him and believed on the Lord. The explanation will be, that Matthew and Mark, presenting a concise version of the passage under review, have employed the plural number instead of the singular; as is the case in the Epistle to the Hebrews, where we find the statement given in the plural form, that “they stopped the mouths of lions,”1432 while Daniel alone is under- stood to be referred to. Again, the plural number is adopted where it is said that they “were sawn asunder,”1433 while that manner of death is reported only of Isaiah. In the same way, when it is said in the Psalm, “The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers took counsel together,” etc.,1434 the plural number is employed instead of the singular, according to the exposition given of the passage in the Acts of the Apostles. For those who have made use of the testimony of the said Psalm in that book take the kings to refer to Herod, and the princes to Pilate.1435 But further, inasmuch as the pagans are in the habit of bringing such 1428 Matt. xxvii. 44. 1429 Mark xv. 32. 1430 Luke xxiii. 39. 1431 Luke xxiii. 40–43. 1432 Heb. xi. 33. 1433 Heb. xi. 37. 1434 Ps. ii. 2. 1435 Acts iv. 26, 27. Of the Derision Ascribed to the Robbers, and of the Question Regarding the Absence of Any Discrepancy Between Matthew and Mark on the One Hand, and Luke on the Other, When the Last-Named Evangelist States that One of the Two Mocked Him, and that the Other Believed on Him. 456 Of the Derision Ascribed to the Robbers, and of the Question Regarding the…

Alle records · Zoek op deze hash