I shall not absolutely accept of the terms of this
controversy, as to the state of it on our part, proposed by him; and yet I
shall not much vary from them. We say, therefore, that “Jesus Christ being
full of all grace, excellencies, and perfections, he communicates them unto
us in that degree as is necessary for us, and in proportion
unto his abundant charity and goodness towards us; and we Christians, as
his body, or fellow-members of his human nature, receive grace and mercy,
flowing from him to us.” This state of the controversy on our side I
suppose he will not refuse, nor the terms of it; but will own them to be
ours, though he will not, it may be, allow some of them to be proper or
convenient. And that he may know who his “they” are, who are at this end
of the difference, he may be pleased to take notice that these words are
the whole and entire paraphrase of Dr
Hammond on John i.
16; the first testimony he undertakes to answer. And when this
author hath replied to Mr Hooker,
Dr Jackson, and him, and such other
pillars of the church of England as concur with them, it will be time
enough for me to consider how I shall defend myself against him. Or, if he
will take the controversy on our part in terms more directly expressive of
my mind, it is the person of Christ is the fountain of all grace to the
church (as he well observes my judgment to be), and that from him all grace
and mercy is derived unto us; and then I do maintain, that the “they” whom
he opposeth, are not only the church of England, but the whole catholic
church in all ages. Who the “we” are, on the other hand, who reject this
assertion, and believe that all the testimonies concerning the fulness of
grace in Christ, and the communication thereof unto us, do only declare the
excellency of his religion, is not easy to be conjectured; — for unless it
be the people of Racow, I know not who are his associates. And let him but
name three divines of any reputation in the church of England since the
Reformation, who have given the least countenance unto his assertions,
negative or positive, and I will acknowledge that he hath better associates
in his profession than as yet I believe he hath. But that Jesus Christ
himself, God and man in one person, the mediator between God and man, is
not a fountain of grace and mercy to his church; that there is no real
internal grace communicated by him, or derived from him unto his mystical
body; that the fulness which is in him, or said to be in him, of grace and
truth, of unsearchable riches of grace, etc., is nothing but the doctrine
which he taught, as the most complete and perfect declaration of the will
of God, — are opinions that cannot be divulged, under pretence of
authority, without the most pernicious scandal to the present church of
England. And if this be the man’s religion, that this is all the fulness
we receive from Christ, — “a perfect revelation of the divine will
concerning the salvation of mankind; which contains so many excellent
promises that it may well be called ‘grace;’ and prescribes such a plain
and simple religion, so agreeable to the natural notions of good and evil,
that it may well be called ‘truth;’ ” — and complying with its doctrine, or
yielding obedience unto its precepts and believing the
promises which it gives, in our own strength, without any real aid,
assistance, or communication of internal saving grace from the person of
Jesus Christ, is our righteousness before God, whereon and for which we are
justified, — I know as well as he whence it came, and perhaps better than
he whither it will go.