2. I have also been grieved by our brother
Dorotheus, because, as he has himself written, he has not gently and
mildly reported everything to your excellency. I set this down to
the difficulty of the times. I seem to be deprived by my sins of
all success in my undertakings, if indeed the best of my brethren are
proved ill-disposed and incompetent, by their failure to perform their
duties in accordance with my wishes. On his return Dorotheus
reported to me the conversation which he had had with your excellency
in the presence of the very venerable bishop Damasus, and he caused me
distress by saying that our God-beloved brethren and fellow-ministers,
Meletius and Eusebius, had been reckoned among the
Ariomaniacs. The Ben. note
points out that the accusation against Eusebius (of Samosata) and
Meletius was monstrous, and remarks on the delicacy with which Basil
approaches it, without directly charging Petrus, from whom it must
have come, with the slander involved. If their
orthodoxy were established by nothing else, the attacks made upon
them by the Arians are, to the minds of all right thinking people,
no small proof of their rectitude. Even your participation
with them in sufferings endured for Christ’s sake ought to
unite your reverence to them in love. Be assured of this,
right honourable sir, that there is no word of orthodoxy which has
not been proclaimed by these men with all boldness. God is my
witness. I have heard them myself. I should not
certainly have now admitted them to communion, if I had caught them
tripping in the faith. But, if it seem good to you, let us
leave the past alone. Let us make a peaceful start for the
future. For we have need one of another in the fellowship of
the members, and specially now, when the Churches of the East are
looking to us, and will take your agreement as a pledge of strength
and consolidation. If, on the other hand, they perceive that
you are in a state of mutual suspicion, they will drop their hands,
and slacken in their resistance to the enemies of the
faith. One
ms. contains a note to the effect that this
letter was never sent. Maran (Vit. Bas. xxxvii.)
thinks the internal evidence is in favour of its having been
delivered.