Chapter XXIII.—That Time is a
Certain Extension.
29. I have heard from a learned man that the
motions of the sun, moon, and stars constituted time, and I
assented not.
1048
For why
should not rather the motions of all bodies be time? What if the
lights of heaven should cease, and a potter’s wheel run round,
would there be no time by which we might measure those revolutions,
and say either that it turned with equal pauses, or, if it were
moved at one time more slowly, at another more quickly, that some
revolutions were longer, others less so? Or while we were saying
this, should we not also be speaking in time? Or should there in
our words be some syllables long, others short, but because those
sounded in a longer time, these in a shorter? God grant to men to
see in a small thing ideas common to things great and small. Both
the stars and luminaries of heaven are “for signs and for
seasons, and for days and years.”
1049
No doubt they are; but neither
should I say that the circuit of that wooden wheel was a day, nor
yet should he say that therefore there was no time.
30. I desire to know the power and nature of
time, by which we measure the motions of bodies, and say (for
example) that this motion is twice as long as that. For, I ask,
since “day” declares not the stay only of the sun upon the
earth, according to which day is one thing, night another, but also
its entire circuit from east even to east,—according to which we
say, “So many days have passed” (the nights being included when
we say “so many days,” and their spaces not counted
apart),—since, then, the day is finished by the motion of the
sun, and by his circuit from east to east, I ask, whether the
motion itself is the day, or the period in which that motion is
completed, or both? For if the first be the day, then would there
be a day although the sun should finish that course in so small a
space of time as an hour. If the second, then that would not be a
day if from one sunrise to another there were but so short a period
as an hour, but the sun must go round four-and-twenty times to
complete a day. If both, neither could that be called a day if the
sun should run his entire round in the space of an hour; nor that,
if, while the sun stood still, so much time should pass as the sun
is accustomed to accomplish his whole course in from morning to
morning. I shall not therefore now ask, what that is which is
called day, but what time is, by which we, measuring the circuit of
the sun, should say that it was accomplished in half the space of
time it was wont, if it had been completed in so small a space as
twelve hours; and comparing both times, we should call that single,
this double time, although the sun should run his course from east
to east sometimes in that single, sometimes in that double time.
Let no man then tell me that the motions of the heavenly bodies are
times, because, when at the prayer of one the sun stood still in
order that he might achieve his victorious battle, the sun stood
still, but time went on. For in such space of time as was
sufficient was that battle fought and ended.
1050
I see that time, then, is a
certain extension. But do I see it, or do I seem to see it? Thou, O
Light and Truth, wilt show me.
1048
Compare Gillies (
Analysis of Aristotle
, c.
2, p. 138): “As our conception of space originates in that of
body, and our conception of motion in that of space, so our
conception of time originates in that of motion; and particularly
in those regular and equable motions carried on in the heavens, the
parts of which, from their perfect similarity to each other, are
correct measures of the continuous and successive quantity called
Time, with which they are conceived to co-exist. Time, therefore,
may be defined the perceived number of successive movements; for,
as number ascertains the greater or lesser quantity of things
numbered, so time ascertains the greater or lesser quantity of
motion performed.” And with this accords Monboddo’s definition
of time (
Ancient Metaphysics
, vol. i. book 4, chap. i.), as
“the measure of the duration of things that exist in succession
by the motion of the heavenly bodies.” See xii. sec. 40, and
note, below.
1049
Gen. i. 14
.
1050
Josh. x. 12–14
.