Chapter 1.—That the Nature of the
Angels, Both Good and Bad, is One and the Same.
It
has
already, in the preceding book, been shown how the two cities
originated among the angels. Before I speak of the creation of
man, and show how the cities took their rise so far as regards the
race of rational mortals I see that I must first, so far as I can,
adduce what may demonstrate that it is not incongruous and
unsuitable to speak of a society composed of angels and men
together; so that there are not four cities or societies,—two,
namely, of angels, and as many of men,—but rather two in all, one
composed of the good, the other of the wicked, angels or men
indifferently.
That the contrary propensities in
good and bad angels have arisen, not from a difference in their
nature and origin, since God, the good Author and Creator of all
essences, created them both, but from a difference in their wills
and desires, it is impossible to doubt. While some steadfastly
continued in that which was the common good of all, namely, in God
Himself, and in His eternity, truth, and love; others, being
enamored rather of their own power, as if they could be their own
good, lapsed to this private good of their own, from that higher
and beatific good which was common to all, and, bartering the lofty
dignity of eternity for the inflation of pride, the most assured
verity for the slyness of vanity, uniting love for factious
partisanship, they became proud, deceived, envious. The cause,
therefore, of the blessedness of the good is adherence to God.
And so the cause of the others’ misery will be found in the
contrary, that is, in their not adhering to God. Wherefore, if
when the question is asked, why are the former blessed, it is
rightly answered, because they adhere to God; and when it is asked,
why are the latter miserable, it is rightly answered, because they
do not adhere to God,—then there is no other good for the
rational or intellectual creature save God only. Thus, though it
is not every creature that can be blessed (for beasts, trees,
stones, and things of that kind have not this capacity), yet that
creature which has the capacity cannot be blessed of itself, since
it is created out of nothing, but only by Him by whom it has been
created. For it is blessed by the possession of that whose loss
makes it miserable. He, then, who is blessed not in another, but
in himself, cannot be miserable, because he cannot lose
himself.
Accordingly we say that there is no
unchangeable good but the one, true, blessed God; that the things
which He made are indeed good because from Him, yet mutable because
made not out of Him, but out of nothing. Although, therefore,
they are not the supreme good, for God is a greater good, yet those
mutable things which can adhere to the immutable good, and so be
blessed, are very good; for so completely is He their good, that
without Him they cannot but be wretched. And the other created
things in the universe are not better on this account, that they
cannot be miserable. For no one would say that the other members
of the body are superior to the eyes, because they
cannot be
blind. But as the sentient nature, even when it feels pain, is
superior to the stony, which can feel none, so the rational nature,
even when wretched, is more excellent than that which lacks reason
or feeling, and can therefore experience no misery. And since
this is so, then in this nature which has been created so
excellent, that though it be mutable itself, it can yet secure its
blessedness by adhering to the immutable good, the supreme God; and
since it is not satisfied unless it be perfectly blessed, and
cannot be thus blessed save in God,—in this nature, I say, not to
adhere to God, is manifestly a fault.
525
Now every fault injures the
nature, and is consequently contrary to the nature. The creature,
therefore, which cleaves to God, differs from those who do not, not
by nature, but by fault; and yet by this very fault the nature
itself is proved to be very noble and admirable. For that nature
is certainly praised, the fault of which is justly blamed. For we
justly blame the fault because it mars the praiseworthy nature.
As, then, when we say that blindness is a defect of the eyes, we
prove that sight belongs to the nature of the eyes; and when we say
that deafness is a defect of the ears, hearing is thereby proved to
belong to their nature;—so, when we say that it is a fault of the
angelic creature that it does not cleave to God, we hereby most
plainly declare that it pertained to its nature to cleave to God.
And who can worthily conceive or express how great a glory that is,
to cleave to God, so as to live to Him, to draw wisdom from Him, to
delight in Him, and to enjoy this so great good, without death,
error, or grief? And thus, since every vice is an injury of the
nature, that very vice of the wicked angels, their departure from
God, is sufficient proof that God created their nature so good,
that it is an injury to it not to be with God.
525
Vitium:
perhaps “fault,” most nearly embraces all the
uses of this word.