II. Wherefore we must keep the feast
spiritually. And this is the beginning of our discourse; for we
must speak, even if our speech do seem a little too discursive; and we
must be diligent for the sake of those who love learning, that we may as it were mix up
some seasoning with our solemn festival. The children of the
Hebrews do honour to the number Seven, according to the legislation of
Moses (as did the Pythagoreans in later days to the number Four, by
which indeed they were in the habit of swearing The followers of
Pythagoras swore by their master, who taught them the mystic properties
of the number Four, which he called the Fountain of the Universe,
because all things were made of four elements. as
the Simonians and Marcionites The Simonians and Marcionites were two
Gnostic sects, the one deriving its name from Simon Magus, the other
from Marcion of Sinope. Simon, of whom we read in the Acts c. viii., is generally regarded by the
Fathers as the precursor of the
Gnostic Heresies. He maintained a system of Emanations from God,
of which he claimed to be himself the chief. In his teaching the
first cause of all things was an Ineffable Existence or Non-existence,
which he sometimes called Silence and sometimes Fire, from which the
Universe was generated by a series of six Emanations called Roots,
which he arranged in pairs, male and female; and these six contained
among them the whole Essence of his first Principle Silence.
These Roots with Simon himself and his consort Helena, make up the
Ogdoad referred to in the text.
Marcion was a native of Sinope in Pontus,
and flourished about the middle of the Second Century. His system
of teaching was mainly rationalistic, and did not recognize (Dr. Mansel
tells us, “Gnostic Heresies,” p. 203) any theory of
Emanations as connecting links between God and the world; for from his
point of view the Supreme God was not, even indirectly, the Author of
the world. It would seem that S. Gregory is confusing Marcion
with Valentinus, and Egyptian heresiarch who flourished about the same
time. In his theory we first find a system of
“Æons,” divided into an Ogdoad, a Decad, and a
Dodecad. Or he may mean Marcus, a follower of Valentinus, and
founder of the subordinate sect of the Marcosians. do by the number
Eight and the number Thirty, inasmuch as they have given names to and
reverence a system of Æons of these numbers); I cannot say by what
rules of analogy, or in consequence of what power of this number;
anyhow they do honour to it. One thing indeed is evident, that
God, having in six days created matter, and given it form, and having
arranged it in all kinds of shapes and mixtures, and having made this
present visible world, on the seventh day rested from all His works, as
is shewn by the very name of the Sabbath, which in Hebrew means
Rest. If there be, however, any more lofty reason than this, let
others discuss it. But this honour which they pay to it is not
confined to days alone, but also extends to years. That belonging
to days the Sabbath proves, because it is continually observed among
them; and in accordance with this the removal of leaven is for that
number of days. Exod. xii. 15. And that
belonging to years is shewn by the seventh year, the year of
Release; Ib. xxi.
2. and it consists not
only of Hebdomads, but of Hebdomads of Hebdomads, alike in days and
years. The Hebdomads of days give birth to Pentecost, a day
called holy among them; and those of years to what they call the
Jubilee, which also has a release of land, and a manumission of slaves,
and a release of possessions bought. For this nation consecrates
to God, not only the firstfruits of offspring, or of firstborn, but
also those of days and years. Thus the veneration paid to the
number Seven gave rise also to the veneration of Pentecost. For
seven being multiplied by seven generates fifty all but one day, which
we borrow from the world to come, at once the Eighth and the first, or
rather one and indestructible. For the present sabbatism of our
souls can find its cessation there, that a portion may be given to
seven and also to eight Eccles. xi. 2. S. Gregory himself (Or. xviii.
“in laudem Patris,” c. 20) comments upon this passage as
enjoining liberal almsgiving. S. Ambrose (in Luc. vi.) has a
mystical interpretation somewhat resembling that here referred
to: but I cannot find a predecessor of Gregory on the
verse. Some later commentators, according to Cornelius and
Lapide, take the Seven of the poor in this life, and the Eight of the
souls in Purgatory, following a common interpretation of these
numbers. (so some of our
predecessors have interpreted this passage of Solomon).