Chapter 23.—Porphyry’s Account
of the Responses Given by the Oracles of the gods Concerning
Christ.
For in his book called
ἐκ λογίων φιλοσοφίας
, in which
he collects and comments upon the responses which he pretends were
uttered by the gods concerning divine things, he says—I give his
own words as they have been translated from the Greek: “To one
who inquired what god he should propitiate in order to recall his
wife from Christianity, Apollo replied in the following
verses.” Then the following words are given as those of
Apollo: “You will probably find it easier to write lasting
characters on the water, or lightly fly like a bird through the
air, than to restore right feeling in your impious wife once she
has polluted herself. Let her remain as she pleases in her
foolish deception, and sing false laments to her dead God, who was
condemned by right-minded judges, and perished ignominiously by a
violent death.” Then after these verses of Apollo (which we
have given in a Latin version that does not preserve the metrical
form), he goes on to say: “In these verses Apollo exposed the
incurable corruption of the Christians, saying that the Jews,
rather than the Christians, recognized God.” See how he
misrepresents
Christ, giving the Jews the
preference to the Christians in the recognition of God. This was
his explanation of Apollo’s verses, in which he says that Christ
was put to death by right-minded or just judges,—in other words,
that He deserved to die. I leave the responsibility of this
oracle regarding Christ on the lying interpreter of Apollo, or on
this philosopher who believed it or possibly himself invented it;
as to its agreement with Porphyry’s opinions or with other
oracles, we shall in a little have something to say. In this
passage, however, he says that the Jews, as the interpreters of
God, judged justly in pronouncing Christ to be worthy of the most
shameful death. He should have listened, then, to this God of the
Jews to whom he bears this testimony, when that God says, “He
that sacrificeth to any other god save to the Lord alone shall be
utterly destroyed.” But let us come to still plainer
expressions, and hear how great a God Porphyry thinks the God of
the Jews is. Apollo, he says, when asked whether word,
i.e
., reason, or law is the better thing, replied in the
following verses. Then he gives the verses of Apollo, from which
I select the following as sufficient: “God, the Generator, and
the King prior to all things, before whom heaven and earth, and the
sea, and the hidden places of hell tremble, and the deities
themselves are afraid, for their law is the Father whom the holy
Hebrews honor.” In this oracle of his god Apollo, Porphyry
avowed that the God of the Hebrews is so great that the deities
themselves are afraid before Him. I am surprised, therefore, that
when God said, He that sacrificeth to other gods shall be utterly
destroyed, Porphyry himself was not afraid lest he should be
destroyed for sacrificing to other gods.
This philosopher, however, has also
some good to say of Christ, oblivious, as it were, of that
contumely of his of which we have just been speaking; or as if his
gods spoke evil of Christ only while asleep, and recognized Him to
be good, and gave Him His deserved praise, when they awoke. For,
as if he were about to proclaim some marvellous thing passing
belief, he says, “What we are going to say will certainly take
some by surprise. For the gods have declared that Christ was very
pious, and has become immortal, and that they cherish his memory:
that the Christians, however, are polluted, contaminated, and
involved in error. And many other such things,” he says, “do
the gods say against the Christians.” Then he gives specimens
of the accusations made, as he says, by the gods against them, and
then goes on: “But to some who asked Hecate whether Christ were
a God, she replied, You know the condition of the disembodied
immortal soul, and that if it has been severed from wisdom it
always errs. The soul you refer to is that of a man foremost in
piety: they worship it because they mistake the truth.” To
this so-called oracular response he adds the following words of his
own: “Of this very pious man, then, Hecate said that the soul,
like the souls of other good men, was after death dowered with
immortality, and that the Christians through ignorance worship
it. And to those who ask why he was condemned to die, the oracle
of the goddess replied, The body, indeed, is always exposed to
torments, but the souls of the pious abide in heaven. And the
soul you inquire about has been the fatal cause of error to other
souls which were not fated to receive the gifts of the gods, and to
have the knowledge of immortal Jove. Such souls are therefore
hated by the gods; for they who were fated not to receive the gifts
of the gods, and not to know God, were fated to be involved in
error by means of him you speak of. He himself, however, was
good, and heaven has been opened to him as to other good men. You
are not, then, to speak evil of him, but to pity the folly of
men: and through him men’s danger is imminent.”
Who is so foolish as not to see
that these oracles were either composed by a clever man with a
strong animus against the Christians, or were uttered as responses
by impure demons with a similar design,—that is to say, in order
that their praise of Christ may win credence for their vituperation
of Christians; and that thus they may, if possible, close the way
of eternal salvation, which is identical with Christianity? For
they believe that they are by no means counter working their own
hurtful craft by promoting belief in Christ, so long as their
calumniation of Christians is also accepted; for they thus secure
that even the man who thinks well of Christ declines to become a
Christian, and is therefore not delivered from their own rule by
the Christ he praises. Besides, their praise of Christ is so
contrived that whosoever believes in Him as thus represented will
not be a true Christian but a Photinian heretic, recognizing only
the humanity, and not also the divinity of Christ, and will thus be
precluded from salvation and from deliverance out of the meshes of
these devilish lies. For our part, we are no better pleased with
Hecate’s praises of Christ than with Apollo’s calumniation of
Him. Apollo says that Christ was put to death by right-minded
judges, implying that
He was unrighteous. Hecate
says that He was a most pious man, but no more. The intention of
both is the same, to prevent men from becoming Christians, because
if this be secured, men shall never be rescued from their power.
But it is incumbent on our philosopher, or rather on those who
believe in these pretended oracles against the Christians, first of
all, if they can, to bring Apollo and Hecate to the same mind
regarding Christ, so that either both may condemn or both praise
Him. And even if they succeeded in this, we for our part would
notwithstanding repudiate the testimony of demons, whether
favorable or adverse to Christ. But when our adversaries find a
god and goddess of their own at variance about Christ the one
praising, the other vituperating Him, they can certainly give no
credence, if they have any judgment, to mere men who blaspheme the
Christians.
When Porphyry or Hecate praises
Christ, and adds that He gave Himself to the Christians as a fatal
gift, that they might be involved in error, he exposes, as he
thinks, the causes of this error. But before I cite his words to
that purpose, I would ask, If Christ did thus give Himself to the
Christians to involve them in error, did He do so willingly, or
against His will? If willingly, how is He righteous? If against
His will, how is He blessed? However, let us hear the causes of
this error. “There are,” he says,” in a certain place very
small earthly spirits, subject to the power of evil demons. The
wise men of the Hebrews, among whom was this Jesus, as you have
heard from the oracles of Apollo cited above, turned religious
persons from these very wicked demons and minor spirits, and taught
them rather to worship the celestial gods, and especially to adore
God the Father. This,” he said, “the gods enjoin; and we have
already shown how they admonish the soul to turn to God, and
command it to worship Him. But the ignorant and the ungodly, who
are not destined to receive favors from the gods, nor to know the
immortal Jupiter, not listening to the gods and their messages,
have turned away from all gods, and have not only refused to hate,
but have venerated the prohibited demons. Professing to worship
God, they refuse to do those things by which alone God is
worshipped. For God, indeed, being the Father of all, is in need
of nothing; but for us it is good to adore Him by means of justice,
chastity, and other virtues, and thus to make life itself a prayer
to Him, by inquiring into and imitating His nature. For
inquiry,” says he, “purifies and imitation deifies us, by
moving us nearer to Him.” He is right in so far as he proclaims
God the Father, and the conduct by which we should worship Him.
Of such precepts the prophetic books of the Hebrews are full, when
they praise or blame the life of the saints. But in speaking of
the Christians he is in error, and caluminates them as much as is
desired by the demons whom he takes for gods, as if it were
difficult for any man to recollect the disgraceful and shameful
actions which used to be done in the theatres and temples to please
the gods, and to compare with these things what is heard in our
churches, and what is offered to the true God, and from this
comparison to conclude where character is edified, and where it is
ruined. But who but a diabolical spirit has told or suggested to
this man so manifest and vain a lie, as that the Christians
reverenced rather than hated the demons, whose worship the Hebrews
prohibited? But that God, whom the Hebrew sages worshipped,
forbids sacrifice to be offered even to the holy angels of heaven
and divine powers, whom we, in this our pilgrimage, venerate and
love as our most blessed fellow-citizens. For in the law which
God gave to His Hebrew people He utters this menace, as in a voice
of thunder: “He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the
Lord only, he shall be utterly destroyed.”
1299
And that no one might suppose
that this prohibition extends only to the very wicked demons and
earthly spirits, whom this philosopher calls very small and
inferior,—for even these are in the Scripture called gods, not of
the Hebrews, but of the nations, as the Septuagint translators have
shown in the psalm where it is said, “For all the gods of the
nations are demons,”
1300
—that no one might suppose, I
say, that sacrifice to these demons was prohibited, but that
sacrifice might be offered to all or some of the celestials, it was
immediately added, “save unto the Lord alone.”
1301
The God
of the Hebrews, then, to whom this renowned philosopher bears this
signal testimony, gave to His Hebrew people a law, composed in the
Hebrew language, and not obscure and unknown, but published now in
every nation, and in this law it is written, “He that sacrificeth
unto any god, save unto the Lord alone, he shall be utterly
destroyed.” What need is there to seek further proofs in the
law or the prophets of this same thing?
Seek
, we need not
say, for the passages are neither few nor difficult to find; but
what need to collect and apply to my argument the
proofs which
are thickly sown and obvious, and by which it appears clear as day
that sacrifice may be paid to none but the supreme and true God?
Here is one brief but decided, even menacing, and certainly true
utterance of that God whom the wisest of our adversaries so highly
extol. Let this be listened to, feared, fulfilled, that there may
be no disobedient soul cut off. “He that sacrifices,” He
says, not because He needs anything, but because it behoves us to
be His possession. Hence the Psalmist in the Hebrew Scriptures
sings, “I have said to the Lord, Thou art my God, for Thou
needest not my good.”
1302
For we ourselves, who are His
own city, are His most noble and worthy sacrifice, and it is this
mystery we celebrate in our sacrifices, which are well known to the
faithful, as we have explained in the preceding books. For
through the prophets the oracles of God declared that the
sacrifices which the Jews offered as a shadow of that which was to
be would cease, and that the nations, from the rising to the
setting of the sun, would offer one sacrifice. From these
oracles, which we now see accomplished, we have made such
selections as seemed suitable to our purpose in this work. And
therefore, where there is not this righteousness whereby the one
supreme God rules the obedient city according to His grace, so that
it sacrifices to none but Him, and whereby, in all the citizens of
this obedient city, the soul consequently rules the body and reason
the vices in the rightful order, so that, as the individual just
man, so also the community and people of the just, live by faith,
which works by love, that love whereby man loves God as He ought to
be loved, and his neighbor as himself,—there, I say, there is not
an assemblage associated by a common acknowledgment of right, and
by a community of interests. But if there is not this, there is
not a people, if our definition be true, and therefore there is no
republic; for where there is no people there can be no
republic.
1299
Ex. xxii. 20
.
1300
Ps. xcvi. 5
.
1301
Augustin here warns his readers
against a possible misunderstanding of the Latin word for alone
(
soli
), which might be rendered “the sun.”
1302
Ps. xvi. 2
.