7. But we seek our own sign of His coming;
we Churchmen seek a sign proper to the Church ἑκκλησιαστικός, when applied to persons, means either, as here, an orthodox member of
the Church in contrast to a heretic, pagan, or Jew (Origen, in
Job xx. 6), or more particularly a Cleric as opposed to a layman
(Cat. xvii. 10).. And the Saviour says, And then
shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate
one another Matt. xxiv. 10.. If thou hear
that bishops advance against bishops, and clergy against clergy, and
laity against laity even unto blood, be not troubled “S. Cyril
here describes the state of the Church, when orthodoxy was for a while
trodden under foot, its maintainers persecuted, and the varieties of
Arianism, which took its place, were quarreling for the
ascendancy. Gibbon quotes two passages, one from a pagan
historian of the day, another from a Father of the Church, which fully
bear out S. Cyril’s words. What made the state of things
still more deplorable, was the defection of some of the orthodox party,
as Marcellus, into opposite errors: while the subsequent
secessions of Apollinaris and Lucifer show what lurking disorders there
were within it at the time when S. Cyril wrote. (Vid.
infr. 9.) The passages referred to are as follows:
‘The Christian Religion,’ says Ammianus, ‘in itself
plain and simple, he (Constantius) confounded by the dotage of
superstition. Instead of reconciling the parties by the weight of
his authority, he cherished and propagated, by vain disputes, the
differences which his vain curiosity had excited. The highways
were covered with troops of Bishops, galloping from every side to the
assemblies, which they called synods; and while they laboured to reduce
the whole sect to their own particular opinions, the public
establishment of the posts was almost ruined by their hasty and
repeated journeys.’ Hist. xxi. 16. S. Hilary
of Poictiers thus speaks of Asia Minor, the chief seat of the Arian
troubles: ‘It is a thing equally deplorable and dangerous,
that there are as many creeds as opinions among men, as many doctrines
as inclinations, and as many sources of blasphemy as there are faults
among us; because we make creeds arbitrarily, and explain them as
arbitrarily. The Homoousion is rejected and received and
explained away by successive synods. The partial or total
resemblance of the Father and of the Son is a subject of dispute for
these unhappy divines. Every year, nay, every moon, we make new
creeds to describe invisible mysteries. We repent of what we have
done, we defend those who repent, we anathematize those whom we
defended. We condemn either the doctrine of others in ourselves,
or our own in that of others; and reciprocally tearing one another to
pieces, we have been the cause of each other’s
ruin,’ ad Constant. ii. 4, 5.
Gibbon’s translations are used, which, though diffuse, are
faithful in their matter. What a contrast do these descriptions
present to Athanasius’ uniform declaration, that the whole
question was really settled at Nicæa, and no other synod or debate
was necessary!”—(R.W.C.).
Compare, for example, the account of the seditions in Antioch and in
Constantinople, in Socrates, Eccles. Hist. i. 24; i.,
12–14, and Athanas. Hist. Arianorum, passim.; for it has been written before. Heed
not the things now happening, but the things which are written; and
even though I who teach thee perish, thou shalt not also perish with
me; nay, even a hearer may become better than his teacher, and he who
came last may be first, since even those about the eleventh hour the
Master receives. If among Apostles there was found treason, dost
thou wonder that hatred of brethren is found among bishops? But
the sign concerns not only rulers, but the people also; for He says,
And because iniquity shall abound, the love of the many shall wax
cold Matt. xxiv. 12.. Will any
then among those present boast that he entertains friendship unfeigned
towards his neighbour? Do not the lips often kiss, and the
countenance smile, and the eyes brighten forsooth, while the heart is
planning guile, and the man is plotting mischief with words of
peace?