Chapter 3.—That the Enemies of
God are So, Not by Nature, But by Will, Which, as It Injures Them,
Injures a Good Nature; For If Vice Does Not Injure, It is Not
Vice.
In Scripture they are called
God’s enemies who oppose His rule, not by nature, but by vice;
having no power to hurt Him, but only themselves. For they are
His enemies, not through their power to hurt, but by their will to
oppose Him. For God is unchangeable, and wholly proof against
injury. Therefore the vice which makes those who are called His
enemies resist Him, is an evil not to God, but to themselves. And
to them it is an evil, solely because it corrupts the good of their
nature. It is not nature, therefore, but vice, which is contrary
to God. For that which is evil is contrary to the good. And who
will deny that God is the supreme good? Vice, therefore, is
contrary to God, as evil to good. Further, the nature it vitiates
is a good, and therefore to this good also it is contrary. But
while it is contrary to God only as evil to good, it is contrary to
the nature it vitiates, both as evil and as hurtful. For to God
no evils are hurtful; but only to natures mutable and corruptible,
though, by the testimony of the vices themselves, originally
good. For were they not good, vices could not hurt them. For
how do they hurt them but by depriving them of integrity, beauty,
welfare, virtue, and, in short, whatever natural good vice is wont
to diminish or destroy? But if there be no good to take away,
then no injury can be done, and consequently
there can be no vice. For it is impossible that there should be a
harmless vice. Whence we gather, that though vice cannot injure
the unchangeable good, it can injure nothing but good; because it
does not exist where it does not injure. This, then, may be thus
formulated: Vice cannot be in the highest good, and cannot be but
in some good. Things solely good, therefore, can in some
circumstances exist; things solely evil, never; for even those
natures which are vitiated by an evil will, so far indeed as they
are vitiated, are evil, but in so far as they are natures they are
good. And when a vitiated nature is punished, besides the good it
has in being a nature, it has this also, that it is not
unpunished.
529
For this
is just, and certainly everything just is a good. For no one is
punished for natural, but for voluntary vices. For even the vice
which by the force of habit and long continuance has become a
second nature, had its origin in the will. For at present we are
speaking of the vices of the nature, which has a mental capacity
for that enlightenment which discriminates between what is just and
what is unjust.
529
With this may be compared the
argument of Socrates in the
Gorgias
, in which it is shown
that to escape punishment is worse than to suffer it, and that the
greatest of evils is to do wrong and not be chastised.