Prolegomena. ———————————— Chapter I. Literature §1. Editions , &c. (A) Before 1601 only Latin translations. The first, at Vicenza , 1482, completed by Barnabas Celsanus after the death of the translator Omnibonus of Lonigo; dedicated to Paul II. Contained a few works only, viz. the ‘two books c. Gentes ,’ the letter to Serapion de Morte Arii , the De Incarn. adv. Arian. and adv. Apollin., ‘the Dispute with Arius at the Council of Nicæa.’ (2) Paris , 1520, pub. by Jean Petit : two books c. Gent . fragment of the ad Marcellin . and some ‘spuria.’ (3) Second edition at Strassburg , 1522. (4) Basel , 1527, by Eramus : Serap . ill. and iv., de Decr., Apol. Fug., Apol. c. Ar . (part of), ‘ ad Monach. ,’ and some ‘spuria’ (he rejected Serap . i. as unworthy of Athan.!). (5) Lyons , 1532, same contents as numbers (2) and (4), but with renderings by Politian, Reuchlin, Erasmus, &c. (6) Cologne , 1632, similar contents. (7) 1556, Basel (‘apud Frobenium’), by P. Nannius , in 4 volumes; great advance on previous editions. 3 vols. contain the version by Nannius of the ‘genuina,’ the fourth ‘spuria,’ rendered by others. The Nannian version was ably tested, and found wanting, under the direction of the congregation of the Index (Migne xxv. pp. xviii. sqq .). (8) 1564 (or 1584?) Basel (substantially the same). (9) 1570, Paris , Vita Antonii and ‘five dialogues de Trin .,’ version of Beza. (10) 1572, Paris , five volumes, combining Nos. 7 and 9. (II) 1574, Paris , Letter ad Amun, Letter 39 (fragment), Letter ad Rufinianum . (12) 1581, Paris , incorporating the latter with No. 10. (13) Rome , 1623, the spurious de variis quæstionibus . (B) The first Greek Edition (14) 1601 at Heidelberg by Commelinus , with the Nannian Latin version (2 vols. fo. with a supplement of fragments, letters, &c., communicated by P. Felckmann). This edition was founded upon Felckmann’s collation of numerous mss. , of which the chief were ( α ) that in the Public Library at Basel (sæc. xiv., not ix.–x. as Felck. states; formerly belonged to the Dominican Friary there). ( β ) The ‘Codex Christophorsoni,’ now at Trin. Coll., Camb., sæc. xvi. ineunt . ( γ ) A ‘Codex Goblerianus’ dated 1319, formerly τῆς μονῆς τοῦ κυρίζου , and principally used by Nannius. Neither this nor the remaining mss. of Felckmann are as yet, I believe, identified. (Particulars, Migne, P.G. xxv. p. xliii.) (15) 1608, Paris , pub. by C. Chappelet, edited by Fronton le Duc, S.J., Latin only. (17) 1612, Paris , No. 15, with Vit. Ant . in Greek and Latin, from an edition (16) of 1611, Augsburg , by Höschel, 4º. (18) 1627, Paris , Greek text of 1601 with version of Nannius from edition No. 17, both injudiciously revised by Jean le Pescheur, from the critical notes of Felckmann himself, which however are omitted in this edition. (19) ‘Cologne,’ or rather Leipzig , 1686, poor reprint of No. 18 with the Syntagma Doctrinæ which Arnold had published in the previous year (see below, ch. ii. §9). (Montf. wrongly dates this 1681.) (C) All the above were entirely superseded by the great (20) 1698 Paris Benedictine Edition by Bernard de Montfaucon , aided, for part of vol. 1, by Jacques Loppin, 3 volumes fol. (i.e. vol. 1, parts 1 and 2, ‘genuina,’ vol. 2 ‘dubia et spuria’), with a new Latin Version and ample prolegomena, &c. Montfaucon took over, apparently without revision, the critical data of Felckmann (including his mistake as to the age of the Basel ms. but collated very many fresh mss. (principally Parisian, full particulars in Migne xxvi. pp. 1449, sqq .), and for the first time put the text on a fairly satisfactory footing. The Works of Athanasius were freshly arranged with an attempt at chronological order, and a ‘Monitum’ or short introduction prefixed to each. Critical, and a few explanatory, notes throughout; also an ‘onomasticon’ or glossary. This splendid edition was far more complete than its predecessors, and beautifully printed. After its completion, Montfaucon discovered fresh material, most of which he published in vol. 2 of his ‘ Collectio Nova Patrum ,’ Paris, 1706, with some further supplementary matter to his Prolegomena, partly in reply to Tillemont upon various critical questions; small additions in his Biblioth. Coisliniana , 1715. (The letters to Lucifer, included in Montfaucon’s edition, had already seen the light in vol. iv. of the Bibliotheca Maxima Patrum (Lyons, 1677, Greek fathers in Latin only), and the two notes to Orsisius were taken from the life of Pachomius in the Acta SS. for May.) (21) 1746, Rome , the de Titulis Psalmorum , edited from Barberini and Vatican mss. by Cardinal Niccolo Antonelli . (22) 1769, Venice , vol. v. of the ‘Bibliotheca Patrum’ of the Oratorian Andrea Gallandi . Contains the works omitted in No. 20, chiefly from Montf. Coll. Nov ., but with a few minor additions, and with the fragments and letters found by Maffei at Verona (see below, pp. 495, 554). (23) 1777, Padua , by Giustiniani , in four volumes, containing firstly Montfaucon’s ‘genuina’ in two volumes, the ‘dubia’ and ‘spuria’ in the third, and the supplementary matter from (21) and (22) in the fourth. The printing of this standard edition is not equal to that of No. 20. (24) ‘1884’ (1857), Paris , vols. xxv.–xxviii. of Migne’s Patrologia Græca, a reprint of No. 23, but in a new order (see vol. xxviii. p. 1650), and with the addition of the Festal Letters from Mai (see below, p. 501). The merits and demerits of this series are well known. Of the latter, the most serious are the misprints, with which every page literally teems. (D) With Migne’s edition the publication of a complete Athanasius (so far as his works are known to be extant) is attained, although there is still everything to be done towards the revision of the text on a critical basis. Among modern editions of large portions of Athanasius from the Benedictine text may be mentioned (25) Thilo , Athan. Opp. dogm. Selecta , Leipz. 1853. (26) Bright , Orations against the Arians (1873 2nd ed. 1883), and Historical Writings of Athanasius, 1881 (Oxf. Univ. Press), with introductions; both most convenient; his Lessons from the lives of three great Fathers (Longmans, 1890) gives an interesting popular study of Athan. Editions of separate books will be noticed in the short Introductions prefixed in this volume.