Chapter XV.
Reply to the suggested objection that we are baptized
“into water.” Also concerning baptism.
34.
What
more? Verily, our opponents are well equipped with
arguments. We are baptized, they urge, into water, and of course
we shall not honour the water above all creation, or give it a share of
the honour of the Father and of the Son. The arguments of these
men are such as might be expected from angry disputants, leaving no
means untried in their attack on him who has offended them, because
their reason is clouded over by their feelings. We will not,
however, shrink from the discussion even of these points. If we
do not teach the ignorant, at least we shall not turn away before evil
doers. But let us for a moment retrace our steps.
35. The dispensation of our God and Saviour
concerning man is a recall from the fall and a return from the
alienation caused by disobedience to close communion with God.
This is the reason for the sojourn of Christ in the flesh, the pattern
life described in the Gospels, the sufferings, the cross, the tomb, the
resurrection; so that the man who is being saved through imitation of
Christ receives that old adoption. For perfection of life the
imitation of Christ is necessary, not only in the example of
gentleness,
1004
lowliness, and long
suffering set us in His life, but also of His actual death. So
Paul, the imitator of Christ,
1005
says,
“being made conformable unto his death; if by any means I
might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.”
1006
How then are we made in the
likeness of His death?
1007
In that we
were buried
1008
with Him by
baptism. What then is the manner of the burial? And what
is the advantage resulting from the imitation? First of all,
it is necessary that the continuity of the old life be cut.
And this is impossible unless a man be born again, according to the
Lord’s word;
1009
for the
regeneration, as indeed the name shews, is a beginning of a second
life. So before beginning the second, it is necessary to put
an end to the first. For just as in the case of runners who
turn and take the second course,
1010
a kind of
halt and pause intervenes between the movements in the opposite
direction, so also in making a change in lives it seemed necessary
for death to come as mediator between the two, ending all that goes
before, and beginning all that comes after. How then do we
achieve the descent into hell? By imitating, through baptism,
the burial of Christ. For the bodies of the baptized are, as
it were, buried in the water. Baptism then symbolically
signifies the putting off of the works of the flesh; as the apostle
says, ye were “circumcised with the circumcision made without
hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the
circumcision of Christ; buried with him in baptism.”
1011
And there is, as it were, a cleansing
of the soul from the filth
1012
that has grown
on it from the carnal mind,
1013
as it is
written, “Thou shalt wash me, and I shall be whiter than
snow.”
1014
On this
account we do not, as is the fashion of the Jews, wash ourselves at
each defilement, but own the baptism of salvation
1015
to be one.
1016
For there the death on behalf of
the world is one, and one the resurrection of the dead, whereof
baptism is a type. For this cause the Lord, who is the
Dispenser of our life, gave us the covenant of baptism, containing a
type of life and death, for the water fulfils the image of death,
and the Spirit gives us the earnest of life. Hence it follows
that the answer to our question why the water was associated with
the Spirit
1017
is clear:
the reason is because in baptism two ends were proposed; on the one
hand, the destroying of the body of sin,
1018
that it may never bear fruit unto death;
1019
on the other hand, our living unto the Spirit,
1020
and having our fruit in
holiness;
1021
the water
receiving the body as in a tomb figures death, while the Spirit
pours in the quickening power, renewing our souls from the deadness
of sin unto their original life. This then is what it is to be
born again of water and of the Spirit, the being made dead being
effected in the water, while our life is wrought in us through the
Spirit. In three immersions,
1022
then, and with three invocations, the great mystery of baptism is
performed, to the end that the type of death may be fully figured,
and that by the tradition of the divine knowledge the baptized may
have their souls enlightened. It follows that if there is any
grace in the water, it is not of the nature of the water, but of the
presence of the Spirit. For baptism is “not the putting
away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience
towards God.”
1023
So in
training us for the life that follows on the resurrection the Lord
sets out all the manner of life required by the Gospel, laying down
for us the law of gentleness, of endurance of wrong, of freedom from
the defilement that comes of the love of pleasure, and from
covetousness, to the end that we may of set purpose win beforehand
and achieve all that the life to come of its inherent nature
possesses. If therefore any one in attempting a definition
were to describe the gospel as a forecast of the life that follows
on the resurrection, he would not seem to me to go beyond what is
meet and right. Let us now return to our main
topic.
36. Through the Holy Spirit comes our
restoration to paradise, our ascension into the kingdom of heaven, our
return to the adoption of sons, our liberty to call God our Father, our
being made partakers of the grace of Christ, our being called children
of light, our sharing in eternal glory, and, in a word, our being
brought into a state of all “fulness of
blessing,”
1024
both in this
world and in the world to come, of all the good gifts that are in
store for us, by promise hereof, through faith, beholding the
reflection of their grace as though they were already present, we
await the full enjoyment. If such is the earnest, what the
perfection? If such the first fruits, what the complete
fulfilment? Furthermore, from this too may be apprehended the
difference between the grace that comes from the Spirit and the
baptism by water: in that John indeed baptized with water, but
our Lord Jesus Christ by the Holy Ghost. “I
indeed,” he says, “baptize you with water unto
repentance; but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose
shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the
Holy Ghost and with fire.”
1025
Here
He calls the trial at the judgment the baptism of fire, as the
apostle says, “The fire shall try every man’s work, of
what sort it is.”
1026
And again,
“The day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by
fire.”
1027
And ere
now there have been some who in their championship of true religion
have undergone the death for Christ’s sake, not in mere
similitude, but in actual fact, and so have needed none of the
outward signs of water for their salvation, because they were
baptized in their own blood.
1028
Thus
I write
not to
disparage the baptism by water, but to overthrow the
arguments
1029
of those who
exalt themselves against the Spirit; who confound things that are
distinct from one another, and compare those which admit of no
comparison.
1004
ἀοργησία
in
Arist.
Eth
. iv. 5, 5, is the defect where meekness
(
πραότης
) is the
mean. In Plutarch, who wrote a short treatise on it, it is a
virtue. In
Mark iii.
5
, Jesus looked round on
them “with anger,”
μετ᾽
ὀργῆς
, but in
Matt. xi. 29
, He calls Himself
πρᾷος
.
1005
cf
.
1 Cor. xi. 1
.
1006
Phil. iii. 10,
11
.
1007
Rom. vi. 4,
5
.
1008
A.V.,
“are buried.” Grk. and R.V., “were
buried.”
1009
John iii. 3
.
1010
In the double
course (
δίαυλος
) the runner
turned (
κάμπτω
) the post at the
end of the stadium. So “
κάμψαι
διαύλον
θάτερον
κῶλον
πάλιν
” in Æsch.
Ag
. 335, for retracing one’s steps another
way.
1011
Col. ii. 11,
12
.
1012
cf
.
1 Pet. iii.
21
.
1013
τὸ
σαρκικὸν
φρόνημα
.
cf
. the
φρόνημα
τῆς σαρκός
of
Rom. viii. 6
.
cf. Article
ix.
1014
Ps. li. 9
.
1015
cf
.
1 Pet. iii.
21
.
1016
cf
.
Eph. iv. 5
.
1017
cf
.
John iii. 5
.
1018
cf
.
Rom. vi. 6
.
1019
cf
.
Rom. vii. 5
.
1020
cf
.
Gal. v. 25
.
1021
cf
.
Rom. vi. 22
.
1022
Trine
immersion was the universal rule of the Catholic Church.
cf
. Greg. Nyss.
The Great Catechism
, p. 502 of this
edition. So Tertull.
de Cor. Mil
. c iii.,
Aquam adituri, ibidem, sed et aliquanto prius in ecclesia, sub
antistitis manu contestamur, nos renuntiare diabolo et pompæ et
angelis ejus. Dehinc ter mergitamur
. Sozomen (vi.
26) says that Eunomius was alleged to be the first to maintain that
baptism ought to be performed in one immersion and to corrupt in
this manner the tradition of the apostles, and Theodoret
(Hæret. fab. iv. 3) describes Eunomius as abandoning the trine
immersion, and also the invocation of the Trinity as baptizing into
the death of Christ. Jeremy Taylor (
Ductor dubitantium
,
iii. 4, Sect. 13) says, “In England we have a custom of
sprinkling, and that but once.…As to the number, though the
Church of England hath made no law, and therefore the custom of
doing it once is the more indifferent and at liberty, yet if the
trine immersion be agreeable to the analogy of the mystery, and the
other be not, the custom ought not to prevail, and is not to be
complied with, if the case be evident or declared.”
1023
1 Pet. iii.
21
.
1024
Rom. xv. 29
.
1025
Matt. iii.
11
.
1026
1 Cor. iii.
13
.
1027
id
.
1028
On the
martyrs’ baptism of blood,
cf
. Eus. vi. 4, on the
martyrdom of the Catechumen Herais. So St. Cyril, of Jerusalem
(
Cat. Lect
. iii. 10), “If a man receive not baptism, he
has not salvation; excepting only the martyrs, even who without the
water receive the kingdom. For when the Saviour was ransoming
the world through the cross, and was pierced in the side, He gave
forth blood and water, that some in times of peace should be
baptized in water; others in time of persecution, in their own
blood.” So Tertullian (
In Valentin
. ii.)
of the Holy Innocents, “baptized in blood for Jesus’
sake” (Keble), “
testimonium Christi sanguine
litavere
.”
1029
Τοὺς
λογισμοὺς
καθαιρῶν
.
cf
.
2 Cor. x.
4
.