37.  For, amid the three infirmities in regard to theology, atheism, Judaism, and polytheism, one of which is patronised by Sabellius the Libyan, another by Arius of Alexandria, and the third by some of the ultra-orthodox among us, what is my position, can I avoid whatever in these three is noxious, and remain within the limits of piety; neither being led astray by the new analysis and synthesis into the atheism Atheism.  This term is used of Sabellianism xviii. 16. xx. 6. xxi. 13. xliii. 30, in the sense in which it is here explained.  Cf. Petav. de Trin. I. vi. 3, sqq. of Sabellius, to assert not so much that all are one as that each is nothing, for things which are transferred and pass into each other cease to be that which each one of them is, of that we have an unnaturally compound deity, like those mythical creatures, the subject of a picturesque imagination:  nor again, by alleging a plurality of severed natures, according to the well named madness Madness of Arianism, xxi. 13. xxxiv. 8. xliii. 30.  This term is applied in a letter of Constantine after the Council of Nicæa.  It is called Judaism also Orat. xx. 6 as frequently by S. Athanasius.  Cf. Petav. de Trin. I. ix. 8. of Arius, becoming involved in a Jewish poverty, and introducing envy into the divine nature, by limiting the Godhead to the Unbegotten One alone, as if afraid that our God would perish, if He were the Father of a real God of equal nature:  nor again, by arraying three principles in opposition to, or in alliance with, each other, introducing the Gentile plurality of principles from which we have escaped?