6. Beasts bear witness to the faith. Hast
thou confidence in the Lord? “Thou shalt walk upon the asp and the basilisk
and thou shalt trample under feet the lion and the
dragon.” cf.
Ps. xci. 13. With faith
thou hast the power to walk upon serpents and scorpions. Do you
not see that the viper which attached itself to the hand of Paul,
whilst he gathered sticks, did not injure him, because it found the
saint full of faith? If you have not faith, do not fear beasts so
much as your faithlessness, which renders you susceptible of all
corruption. But I see that for a long time you have been asking
me for an account of the creation of man, and I think I can hear you
all cry in your hearts, We are being taught the nature of our
belongings, but we are ignorant of ourselves. Let me then speak
of it, since it is necessary, and let me put an end to my
hesitation. In truth the most difficult of sciences is to know
one’s self. Not only our eye, from which nothing outside us
escapes, cannot see itself; but our mind, so piercing to discover the
sins of others, is slow to recognise its own faults. cf. St.
Matt. vii. 3. Thus my speech, after eagerly
investigating what is external to myself, is slow and hesitating in
exploring my own nature. Yet the beholding of heaven and earth
does not make us know God better than the attentive study of our being
does; I am, says the Prophet, fearfully and wonderfully
made; cf.
Ps. cxxxix.
14. that is to say,
in observing myself I have known Thy infinite wisdom. “E
cœlo descendit γνῶθι
σεαυτόν”
(Juv. xi. 27). Socrates, Chilo, Thales, Cleobulus, Bias,
Pythagoras, have all been credited with the saying.
“On reconnaît ici le précepte fécond de
l’école socratique. L’église chrétienne s’en empara comme
de tout ce qu’elle trouvait de grand et de bon dans
l’ancienne Grèce. Fialon.
St. Basil has a Homily on the text
πρόσεχε
σεαυτῷ (Deut. xv. 9, lxx.) And God said “Let us make
man.”
Gen. i. 26. Does not
the light of theology shine, in these words, as through windows; and
does not the second Person show Himself in a mystical way, without
yet manifesting Himself until the great day? Where is the Jew
who resisted the truth and pretended that God was speaking to
Himself? It is He who spoke, it is said, and it is He who
made. “Let there be light and there was
light.” But then their words contain a manifest
absurdity. Where is the smith, the carpenter, the shoemaker,
who, without help and alone before the instruments of his trade,
would say to himself; let us make the sword, let us put together the
plough, let us make the boot? Does he not perform the work of
his craft in silence? Strange folly, to say that any one has
seated himself to command himself, to watch over himself, to
constrain himself, to hurry himself, with the tones of a
master! But the unhappy creatures are not afraid to calumniate
the Lord Himself. What will they not say with a tongue so well
practised in lying? Here, however, words stop their mouth;
“And God said let us make man.” Tell me; is there
then only one Person? It is not written “Let man be
made,” but, “Let us make man.” The preaching
of theology remains enveloped in shadow before the appearance of him
who was to be instructed, but, now, the creation of man is expected,
that faith unveils herself and the dogma of truth appears in all its
light. “Let us make man.” O enemy of Christ,
hear God speaking to His Co-operator, to Him by Whom also He made
the worlds, Who upholds all things by the word of His
power. cf.
Heb. i. 2, 3. But He
does not leave the voice of true religion without answer. Thus
the Jews, race hostile to truth, when they find themselves pressed,
act like beasts enraged against man, who roar at the bars of their
cage and show the cruelty and the ferocity of their nature, without
being able to assuage their fury. God, they say, addresses
Himself to several persons; it is to the angels before Him that He
says, “Let us make man.” Jewish fiction! a fable
whose frivolity shows whence it has come. To reject one
person, they admit many. To reject the Son, they raise
servants to the dignity of counsellors; they make of our fellow
slaves the agents in our creation. The perfect man attains the
dignity of an angel; but what creature can be like the
Creator? Listen to the continuation. “In our
image.” What have you to reply? Is there one image
of God and the angels? Father and Son have by absolute
necessity the same form, but the form is here understood as becomes
the divine, not in bodily shape, but in the proper qualities of
Godhead. Hear also, you who belong to the new
concision
Phil. iii. 2. and who, under
the appearance of Christianity, strengthen the error of the
Jews. The
Arians. To Whom
does He say, “in our image,” to whom if it is not to Him
who is “the brightness of His glory and the express image of
His person,”
Heb. i. 3. “the image
of the invisible God”?
Col. i. 15. It is
then to His living image, to Him Who has said “I and my Father
are one,”
John x. 30. “He that
hath seen me hath seen the Father,”
John xiv. 9.
that God says “Let us make man in our image.”
Where is the unlikeness τὸ
ἀνόμοιον.
Arius had taught that the Persons are ἀνόμοιοι
πάμπαν
ἀλλήλων. in these Beings
who have only one image? “So God created
man.”
Gen. i. 27.
It is not “They
made.” Here Scripture avoids the plurality of the
Persons. After having enlightened the Jew, it dissipates the
error of the Gentiles in putting itself under the shelter of unity,
to make you understand that the Son is with the Father, and guarding
you from the danger of polytheism. He created him in the image
of God. God still shows us His co-operator, because He does
not say, in His image, but in the image of God.