30.  He lived then as becomes the rulers of such a people, but did he fail to teach as he lived?  Were his contests out of harmony with his teaching?  Were his dangers less than those of men who have contended for any truth?  Were his honours inferior to the objects for which he contended?  Did he after his reception in any way disgrace that reception?  By no means.  Everything was harmonious, as an air upon a single lyre, and in the same key; his life, his teaching, his struggles, his dangers, his return, and his conduct after his return.  For immediately on his restoration to his Church, he was not like those who are blinded by unrestrained passion, who, under the dominion of their anger, thrust away or strike at once whatever comes in their way, even though it might well be spared.  But, thinking this to be a special time for him to consult his reputation, since one who is ill-treated is usually restrained, and one who has the power to requite a wrong is ungoverned, he treated so mildly and gently those who had injured him, that even they themselves, if I may say so, did not find his restoration distasteful.