Letter LII.
From Theodoret, Bishop of Cyrus, to
Leo. (See vol. iii. of this Series, p. 293.)
To Leo, bishop of Rome.
I.
If Paul appealed to Peter how much
more must ordinary folk have recourse to his successor.
If Paul, the herald of the Truth, the trumpet of the
Holy Ghost, had recourse to the great Peter, in order to obtain a
decision from him for those at Antioch who were disputing about living
by the Law, much more do we small and humble folk run to the Apostolic
See to get healing from you for the sores of the churches. For it
is fitting that you should in all things have the pre-eminence, seeing
that your See possesses many peculiar privileges. For other
cities get a name for size or beauty or population, and some that are
devoid of these advantages are compensated by certain spiritual
gifts: but your city has the fullest
abundance of good things from the Giver
of all good. For she is of all cities the greatest and most
famous, the mistress of the world and teeming with population.
And besides this she has created an empire which is still predominant
and has imposed her own name upon her subjects. But her chief
decoration is her Faith, to which the Divine Apostle is a sure witness
when he exclaims “your faith is proclaimed in all the
world
375
;” and if immediately after
receiving the seeds of the saving Gospel she bore such a weight of
wondrous fruit, what words are sufficient to express the piety which is
now found in her? She has, too, the tombs of our common fathers
and teachers of the Truth, Peter and Paul
376
,
to illumine the souls of the faithful. And this blessed and
divine pair arose indeed in the East, and shed its rays in all
directions, but voluntarily underwent the sunset of life in the West,
from whence now it illumines the whole world. These have rendered
your See so glorious: this is the chief of all your goods.
And their See is still blest by the light of their
God’s
presence, seeing that therein He has placed
your Holiness to shed abroad the rays of the one true Faith.
II.
He commends Leo’s zeal against
the Manichees, and latterly against Eutychianism, as evidenced
especially in the Tome.
Of which thing indeed, though there are many other
proofs to be found, your zeal against the ill-famed Manichæans is
proof enough, that zeal which your holiness has of late years
displayed
377
, thereby
revealing the intensity of your devotion to
God
in things Divine. Proof enough, too, of your
Apostolic character is what you have now written. For we have met
with what your holiness has written about the Incarnation of our
God
and Saviour, and have admired the careful
diligence of the work
378
. For it
has proved both points equally well, viz., the Eternal Godhead of the
Only-begotten of the Eternal Father, and at the same time His manhood
of the seed of Abraham and David, and His assumption of a nature in all
things like ours, except in this one thing, that He remained free from
all sin: for sin is engendered not of nature, but of free
will
379
. This also was contained in your
letter, that the only-begotten Son of
God
is
One and His Godhead impassible, irreversible, unchangeable even as the
Father who begat Him and the All-holy Spirit. And since the
Divine nature could not suffer, He took the nature that could suffer to
this end, that by the suffering of His own Flesh He might give
exemption from suffering to those that believed on Him. These
points, and all that is akin thereto, the letter contained. And
we, admiring your spiritual wisdom, extolled the grace of the Holy
Ghost which spoke through you, and ask and pray, and beg and beseech
your holiness to come to the rescue of the churches of
God
that are now tempest tossed.
III.
He complains of Dioscorus’
ill-treatment of himself.
For when we expected a stilling of the waves
through those who were sent to Ephesus from your holiness, we have
fallen into yet worse storm. For the most righteous
380
prelate of Alexandria was not satisfied
with the illegal and most unrighteous deposition of the Lord’s
most holy and God-loving bishop of Constantinople, Flavian, nor was his
wrath appeased by the slaughter of the other bishops likewise.
But me, too, he murdered with his pen in my absence, without calling me
to judgment, without passing judgment on me in person, without
questioning me on what I hold about the Incarnation of our
God
and Saviour. But even murderers, tomb-breakers,
and ravishers of other men’s beds, those who sit in judgment do
not condemn until they either themselves corroborate the accusations by
their confessions, or are clearly convicted by others. But us,
when five and thirty days’ journey distant, he, though brought up
on Divine laws, has condemned at his will. And not now only has
he done this, but also last year, after that two persons infected with
the Apollinarian disorder had come hither and laid false information
against us, he rose up in church and anathematized us, and that when I
had written to him and expressed what I hold in a letter.
IV.
This ill-treatment has come after 20
years’ good work in his diocese of Cyrus
.
I bemoan the distress of the Church and yearn
after its peace. For having ruled through your prayers the church
committed to me by the
God
of the universe for
20 years, neither in the time of the blessed Theodotus, president of
the East, nor in the time of those
who have succeeded him in the See of Antioch,
have I received the slightest blame, but, the Divine Grace working with
me, have freed more than 1,000 souls from the disease of Marcion, and
have won over many others from the company of Arius and Eunomius to the
Master, Christ. And 800 churches have I had to shepherd:
for that is the number of parishes in Cyrus, in which not a single tare
through your prayers has lingered. But our flock has been freed
from every heretical error. He that sees all things knows how I
have been stoned by the ill-famed heretics that have been sent against
me, and what struggles I have had in many cities of the East against
Greeks, Jews, and every heretical error. And after all these
toils and troubles, I have been condemned without a hearing.
V.
He appeals to the Apostolic See with
confidence.
I however await the verdict of your Apostolic See,
and beg and pray your Holiness to succour me when I appeal to your
upright and just tribunal, and bid me come to you and show that my
teaching follows in the track of the Apostles. For there are
writings of mine some 20 years ago, some 18, some 15, and some 12, some
again against the Arians and Eunomians, some against the Jews and
Greeks some against the Magi in Persia, some also about the universal
Providence, others about the nature of
God
and
about the Divine Incarnation. I have interpreted, through the
Divine grace, both the Apostolic writings and the prophetic utterances,
and it is easy therefrom to gather whether I have kept unswervingly the
standard of the Faith, or have turned aside from its straight
path. And I beg you not to spurn my petition, nor to overlook the
insults heaped on my poor white hairs.
VI.
Ought he to acquiesce in his
deposition?
First of all, I beg you to tell me, whether I
ought to acquiesce in this unrighteous deposition or not. For I
await your verdict and, if you bid me abide by my condemnation, I will
abide by it, and will trouble no one hereafter, but await the unerring
verdict of our
God
and Saviour. I
indeed, the Master
God
is my witness, care
nought for honour and glory, but only for the stumbling-block that is
put in men’s way: because many of the simpler folk, and
especially those who have been rescued by us from divers heresies, will
give credence to those who have condemned us, and perchance reckon us
heretics, not being able to discern the exact truth of the dogma, and
because, after my long episcopate, I have acquired neither house, nor
land, nor obol, nor tomb, only a voluntary poverty, having straightway
distributed even what came to me from my fathers after their death, as
all know who live in the East.
VII.
Being prevented himself, he has sent
delegates to plead his cause.
And before all things I entreat you, holy and
God-loved brother, render assistance to my prayers. These things
I have brought to your Holiness’ knowledge, by the most religious
and God-beloved presbyters, Hypatius and Abramius the
chorepiscopi
381
, and Alypius,
superintendent
382
of the monks in
our district: seeing that I was hindered from coming to you
myself by the Emperor’s restraining letter, and likewise the
others. And I entreat your holiness both to look on them with
fatherly regard, and to lend them your ears in sincere kindness, and
also to deem my slandered and falsely attacked position worthy of your
protection, and above all to defend with all your might the Faith that
is now plotted against, and to keep the heritage of the fathers intact
for the churches, so shall your holiness receive from the Bountiful
Master a full reward. (Date about the end of
449.)
375
Rom. i. 8
.
376
It is
sufficient here to quote Eusebius (
Hist. Eccl.
ii. 25) as one of
the earliest (before 340) maintainers of this tradition. In this
passage he again quotes Gaius of Rome (3rd cent.) and Dionysius of
Corinth (2nd cent.) as corroborative authorities.
Eusebius’s own words are these: “Paul is recorded to
have been beheaded in Rome itself, and Peter likewise to have been
impaled. And this statement is supported by their names, which
remain to this day inscribed in the cemeteries there.”
377
Viz., in
444: cf. Letter VII.
supra
, together with the
Emperor’s decree (Lett. VIII.).
378
This is, of
course, the Tome (Lett. XXVIII.).
379
Here
‘nature’ must mean ‘man’s original nature
before the Fall,’ when it was still in the image of Him who so
created it, to which nature Christ’s manhood was a triumphant
return. Otherwise it’s hard to see how Theodoret escapes
the pitfall of Pelagianism.
380
The epithet is shown
by the context to be bitterly sarcastic.
381
Chorepiscopi
(country bishops) were a kind of suffragan bishop to assist the town
bishops in the remoter parts of their diocese. They continued in
use from the end of the 3rd till the 9th century, when they were
abolished.
382
Exarchus
.