Epistle
XXXIII.
To Mauricius Augustus.
Gregory to Mauricius Augustus.
The provident piety of my lords, lest perchance
any scandal might be engendered in the unity of Holy Church by the
dissension of priests, has once and again deigned to admonish me to
receive kindly the representatives of my brother and fellow-priest
Cyriacus, and to give them liberty to return soon. And although,
most pious lord, all your injunctions are suitable and provident, yet I
find that by such an admonition I am reproved as being in your judgment
indiscreet. But, even though my mind has been wounded in no
slight degree by a proud and profane title, could I possibly be guilty
of so great indiscretion as not to know what I owed to the unity of the
faith and to ecclesiastical concord, and to refuse to receive the
representatives and the synodical letter of my brother on account of
bitterness from whatever cause intervening? Far be this from
me. Such wisdom had been unwisdom. For what is due from us
for conserving unity of faith is one thing; what is due for restraining
elation is another. Times therefore were to be distinguished,
lest the newness of my aforesaid brother might in any point be
disturbed
1716
. Whence
also I received his representatives with great affection.
Whatever charity I owed to them I displayed, and honoured them more
than it had been the ancient custom to do, and caused them to celebrate
the sacred solemnities of mass with me; since, even as my deacon ought
not to serve, for exhibition of the sacred mysteries, him who has
either committed the sin of elation or corrects it not himself when
committed by others, so it was right that his ministers should attend,
in the celebration of mass, on me, who, under
the keeping of
God
, have not fallen into the error of pride.
I have however taken care to admonish earnestly
the same my brother and fellow-bishop that, if he desires to have peace
and concord with all, he must refrain from the appellation of a foolish
title. As to this, the piety of my lords has charged me in their
orders, saying that offence ought not to be engendered among us for the
appellation of a frivolous name. But I beseech your imperial
Piety to consider that some frivolous things are very harmless, and
others exceedingly harmful. Is it not the case that, when
Antichrist comes and calls himself
God
, it
will be very frivolous, and yet exceedingly pernicious? If we
regard the quantity of the language used, there are but a few
syllables; but if the weight of the wrong, there is universal
disaster. Now I confidently say that whosoever calls himself, or
desires to be called, Universal Priest, is in his elation the precursor
of Antichrist, because he proudly puts himself above all others.
Nor is it by dissimilar pride that he is led into error; for, as that
perverse one wishes to appear as above all men, so whosoever this one
is who covets being called sole priest, he extols himself above all
other priests. But, since the Truth says,
Every one that
exalteth himself shall be humbled
(
Luke xiv. 11; xviii. 14
), I know that every kind of
elation is the sooner burst as it is the more inflated. Let then
your Piety charge those who have fallen into an example of pride not to
generate any offence by the appellation of a frivolous name. For
I, a sinner, who by the help of
God
retain
humility, need not to be admonished to humility. Now may Almighty
God
long guard the life of our most serene
Lord
for the peace of holy Church and the
advantage of the Roman republic. For we are sure, that if you
live who fear the
Lord
of heaven, you will
allow no proud doings to prevail against the truth.
1716
So
literally;—“Ne prædicti fratri mei ex quolibet
articulo novitas turbaretur.” The meaning seems to be, Lest
Cyriacus should be troubled immediately on his accession. He was
to be remonstrated with in due time; but rejection at once of his
synodical letter and of his emissaries would have been premature.