Technische verwerking bevestigt geen inhoudelijke beoordeling of toestemming voor openbare publicatie.
Versie 02801a1083ec082fdacf9dcbb79f165c625dbb1fa5f9453ed3fc8f7c47150a92
{"author":null,"canonical_references":[],"database_sha256":"8cfbe7284c6936871d57c02dc6aa63ebbdfd4722422d539dd9f716e46e91112e","date_end":null,"date_start":null,"edition_year":null,"id":"sermonindex-ecf-5401","native_reference":{"book_number":550,"chapter_from":1,"chapter_to":1,"system":"MyBible module coordinates (mapping unverified)","verse_from":2,"verse_to":2},"public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"verse-keyed-module-record","review_required":["English edition and exact text","author/work attribution","dating","verse mapping and citation kind","reuse and attribution","split author quotations and deduplicate"],"review_status":"unreviewed","source_html":"<p><b>Gaius Marius Victorinus</b>: Whereas he was accustomed to call himself simply Paul the apostle to the Romans and Corinthians, in order to startle the Galatians and reprove them for a grave error he has joined with himself all the brothers who were with him, saying that they themselves were writing to the Galatians, making them feel the shame of thinking contrary to everyone, so as to give more weight to his own injunctions and the gospel that he preaches.<br/><i>— EPISTLE TO THE Galatians 1.1.1</i></p><p><b>Jerome</b>: (Vers. 2.) And all the brothers who are with me, to the churches of Galatia. In other Epistles, Sosthenes and Silvanus, and sometimes even Timothy, are mentioned at the beginning. In this one, however, because the authority of many was necessary, the name of all the brothers is assumed. They themselves perhaps were also of the circumcision, and were not held in contempt by the Galatians. For it is of great importance to correct the people, to have the agreement and consensus of many in one matter. But when he says 'to the churches of Galatia,' it should be noted that here he writes not only to one church of one city, but to the churches of the whole province, and he calls them churches, which he later accuses of being corrupt by error. From this it is to be understood that the Church can be said in two ways: the one which has no spot or wrinkle and truly is the body of Christ, and the one which gathers in the name of Christ without full and perfect virtues (Ephesians 5). The wise are called in two ways, both those who are full of perfect virtue and those who are just beginning and are in progress. Concerning the perfect, it is said: 'I will send to you wise men' (Luke 11:49). Concerning the foolish: 'Reprove a wise man, and he will love thee' (Proverbs 8:9). For he who is full and complete in virtue does not need correction. This sense can be understood in regard to the other virtues as well, namely that the courageous and prudent, pious, chaste, just, and temperate are sometimes understood correctly, sometimes incorrectly.<br/><i>— Commentary on Galatians</i></p><p><b>John Chrysostom</b>: \"And all the brethren which are with me.\"</p><p>Why is it that he has on no other occasion in sending an epistle added this phrase? For either he puts his own name only or that of two or three others, but here has mentioned the whole number and so has mentioned no one by name.</p><p>On what account then does he this?</p><p>They made the slanderous charge that he was singular in his preaching, and desired to introduce novelty in Christian teaching. Wishing therefore to remove their suspicion, and to show he had many to support him in his doctrine, he has associated with himself \"the brethren,\" to show that what he wrote he wrote with their accord.</p><p>\"Unto the Churches of Galatia.\"</p><p>Thus it appears, that the flame of error had spread over not one or two cities merely, but the whole Galatian people. Consider too the grave indignation contained in the phrase, \"unto the Churches of Galatia:\" he does not say, \"to the beloved\" or \"to the sanctified,\" and this omission of all names of affection or respect, and this speaking of them as a society merely, without the addition \"Churches of God,\" for it is simply \"Churches of Galatia,\" is strongly expressive of deep concern and sorrow. Here at the outset, as well as elsewhere, he attacks their irregularities, and therefore gives them the name of \"Churches,\" in order to shame them, and reduce them to unity. For persons split into many parties cannot properly claim this appellation, for the name of \"Church\" is a name of harmony and concord.<br/><i>— Homily on Galatians 1</i></p><p><b>John Damascene</b>: He indicates by this the necessity of the Letter; for it was not only one Church that prompted him to such a diligent action, but a multitude of Churches.</p><p><b>John Damascene</b>: Again he takes up the point they made, namely, that Paul is one, and the Apostles, many. Thus he brought in with him a whole multitude, and not as in other Letters, only Paul, or Paul and Timothy, or Silvanus as well.</p><p><b>Oecumenius</b>: \"and all the brothers with me.\" For what reason does he now mention all the brothers together? Because those who were accusing him said that Paul alone was now forbidding circumcision; therefore he wishes to show that there are many allies to him in such a teaching.</p><p>\"to the Churches of Galatia.\" See the mark of anger. For he did not say, as was customary, \"to the Beloved,\" or \"to the Sanctified,\" or at least \"to the Churches of God,\" but \"of Galatia.\"<br/><i>— Commentary on Galatians</i></p><p><b>Theodoret of Cyrus</b>: The epistle to the Galatians was written from Rome. The divine apostle had already seen and taught them.<br/><i>— EPISTLE TO THE Galatians 6.18</i></p>","source_html_sha256":"e73852a86deb123331b0f24e3cb1cc7deb3b283be03d7d8edd84e32db4a63186","source_module":"ECF","source_row_id":5401,"source_url":"https://www.sermonindex.net/commentary/ecf/","text_sha256":"b3c44fd99e0906ecf678002a690935d27db561640922a9176a03ba3ff29235d6","translator":null,"work":null}references: [] | work_id: | origin: existing-private-derived-record | source: https://www.sermonindex.net/commentary/ecf/