4.  I am charged with blasphemy against God.  Yet it is impossible for me to be convicted on the ground of any treatise concerning the Faith, which they urge against me, nor can I be charged on the ground of the utterances which I have from time to time delivered by word of mouth, without their being committed to writing, in the churches of God.  Not a single witness has been found to say that he has ever heard from me, when speaking in private, anything contrary to true religion.  If then I am not an unorthodox writer, if no fault can be found with my preaching, if I do not lead astray those who converse with me in my own home, on what ground am I being judged?  But there is a new invention!  Somebody, i.e.Apollinarius.  cf. Letters cxxx. p. 198, and ccxxiv. runs the charge, in Syria has written something inconsistent with true religion; and twenty years or more ago you wrote him a letter:  so you are an accomplice of the fellow, and what is urged against him is urged against you.  O truth-loving sir, I reply, you who have been taught that lies are the offspring of the devil; what has proved to you that I wrote that letter?  You never sent; you never asked; you were never informed by me, who might have told you the truth.  But if the letter was mine, how do you know that the document that has come into your hands now is of the same date as my letter?  Who told you that it is twenty years old?  How do you know that it is a composition of the man to whom my letter was sent?  And if he was the composer, and I wrote to him, and my letter and his composition belong to the same date, what proof is there that I accepted it in my judgment, and that I hold those views?