Cf. Hil. de Syn. 77, and appendix, note 3, also supr. p. 303, and note. The ὁμοούσιον was not imposed upon Ursacius and Valens, a.d. 347, by Pope Julius; nor in the Council of Aquileia in 381, was it offered by S. Ambrose to Palladius and Secundianus. S. Jerome’s account of the apology made by the Fathers of Ariminum is of the same kind. ‘We thought,’ they said, ‘the sense corresponded to the words, nor in the Church of God, where there is simplicity, and a pure confession, did we fear that one thing would be concealed in the heart, another uttered by the lips. We were deceived by our good opinion of the bad.’ ad Lucif. 19.
{"context":{"$text_sha256":"38943da7f5821d1340a38d4ec7393ea89851881197317a09732d8df700e04c0e"},"context_xpath":"/ThML/ThML.body/div1[22]/div2[2]/div3[3]/p[24]","kind":"whole-historical-note","source_family":"athanasius-bounded-remainder","title":"On the Councils of Ariminum and Seleucia. (De Synodis.)","work":"xxii.ii","xpath":"/ThML/ThML.body/div1[22]/div2[2]/div3[3]/p[24]/note[3]"}