Testimonia

{"author":null,"backreferences":[{"context_html":"<p>We must, however, not rest satisfied with these, but endeavour as\r\nwe best can to adduce the doctrines laid down on the point by the\r\nnaturalists; for they say that Anaxagoras of Clazomenæ affirmed\r\ncontemplation and the freedom flowing from it to be the end of life;\r\nHeraclitus the Ephesian, complacency. The Pontic Heraclides relates,\r\nthat Pythagoras taught that the knowledge of the perfection of the\r\nnumbers<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_240\" id=\"FNanchor_240\">[240]</a> was happiness of the soul. The Abderites also teach the\r\nexistence of an end. Democritus, in his work <i>On the Chief End</i>,\r\nsaid it was cheerfulness, which he also called well-being, and often\r\nexclaims, “For delight and its absence are the boundary of those who\r\nhave reached full age;” Hecatæus, that it was sufficiency to one’s\r\nself; Apollodotus of Cyzicum, that it was delectation; as Nausiphanes,\r\nthat it was undauntedness,<a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_241\" id=\"FNanchor_241\">[241]</a> for he said that it was this that<span class=\"pagenum\" id=\"Page_74\">[74]</span> was\r\ncalled by Democritus imperturbability. In addition to these still,\r\nDiotimus declared the end to be perfection of what is good, which he\r\nsaid was termed well-being. Again, Antisthenes, that it was humility.\r\nAnd those called Annicereans, of the Cyrenaic succession, laid down\r\nno definite end for the whole of life; but said that to each action\r\nbelonged, as its proper end, the pleasure accruing from the action.\r\nThese Cyrenaics reject Epicurus’ definition of pleasure, that is the\r\nremoval of pain, calling that the condition of a dead man; because\r\nwe rejoice not only on account of pleasures, but companionships and\r\ndistinctions; while Epicurus thinks that all joy of the soul arises\r\nfrom previous sensations of the flesh. Metrodorus, in his book <i>On\r\nthe Source of Happiness in Ourselves being greater than that which\r\narises from Objects</i>, says: What else is the good of the soul but\r\nthe sound state of the flesh, and the sure hope of its continuance?</p>","headings":["THE WRITINGS OF CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA.","BOOK II.","CHAPTER XXI. OPINIONS OF VARIOUS PHILOSOPHERS ON THE CHIEF GOOD."],"marker_anchor":"FNanchor_240","paragraph_id":"pg73020-paragraph-121"}],"canonical_references":[],"date_end":null,"date_start":null,"deduplication_fingerprint":"582f46fe76b4a6d07a039c8f6a718246c9de2adacd7639f01ceffe77e85ce962","edition_title":"The writings of Clement of Alexandria, Vol. 2 (of 2)","edition_translators":["William Wilson"],"edition_year":1869,"explicit_reference_candidates":[],"headings":[],"id":"pg73020-Footnote_240","license_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html","public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"original-editor-translator-note","review_required":["work and recension attribution","original-work chronology","Bible reference numbering and citation kind","English edition rights and attribution"],"review_status":"needs_review","rights_evidence":"Project Gutenberg metadata: Public domain in the USA. Existing 1869 English translation; translator died 1875. Electronic transcription subject to Project Gutenberg reuse terms.","source_anchor":"Footnote_240","source_ebook":73020,"source_html":"<div class=\"footnote\">\n<p><a class=\"label pginternal\" href=\"#FNanchor_240\" id=\"Footnote_240\">[240]</a> The text has ἀρετῶν, virtues, for which, in accordance\r\nwith Pythagoras’ well-known opinion, ἀριθμῶν has been substituted from\r\nTheodoret.</p>\n</div>","source_sha256":"c35077683d75abe553cc6ef5d3ef5a1a978f07dfbcf4bad5c3d56302ad03dc19","source_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/73020/pg73020-images.html#Footnote_240","text_sha256":"b111e23ea605e697f6ee4dfe279d65c5bef0d3ad82106f27bbde01af18baf717","verified":false,"work_id":null}

references: [] | work_id: | origin: existing-private-derived-record | source: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/73020/pg73020-images.html#Footnote_240