Chapter 11.—That the Greeks
Admitted Players to Offices of State, on the Ground that Men Who
Pleased the Gods Should Not Be Contemptuously Treated by Their
Fellows.
It was a part of this same
reasonableness of the Greeks which induced them to bestow upon the
actors of these same plays no inconsiderable civic honors. In the
above-mentioned book of the
De Republica
, it is mentioned
that Aeschines, a very eloquent Athenian, who had been a tragic
actor in his youth, became a statesman, and that the Athenians
again and again sent another tragedian, Aristodemus, as their
plenipotentiary to Philip. For they judged it unbecoming to
condemn and treat as infamous persons those who were the chief
actors in the scenic entertainments which they saw to be so
pleasing to the gods. No doubt this was immoral of the Greeks,
but there can be as little doubt they acted in conformity with the
character of their gods; for how could they have presumed to
protect the conduct of the citizens from being cut to pieces by the
tongues of poets and players, who were allowed, and even enjoined
by the gods, to tear their divine reputation to tatters? And how
could they hold in contempt the men who acted in the theatres those
dramas which, as they had ascertained, gave pleasure to the gods
whom they worshipped? Nay, how could they but grant to them the
highest civic honors? On what plea could they honor the priests
who offered for them acceptable sacrifices to the gods, if they
branded with infamy the actors who in behalf of the people gave to
the gods that pleasure or honour which they demanded, and which,
according to the account of the priests, they were angry at not
receiving. Labeo,
102
whose learning makes him an
authority on such points, is of opinion that
the
distinction between good and evil deities should find expression in
a difference of worship; that the evil should be propitiated by
bloody sacrifices and doleful rites, but the good with a joyful and
pleasant observance, as,
e.g
. (as he says himself), with
plays, festivals, and banquets.
103
All this we shall, with God’s
help, hereafter discuss. At present, and speaking to the subject
on hand, whether all kinds of offerings are made indiscriminately
to all the gods, as if all were good (and it is an unseemly thing
to conceive that there are evil gods; but these gods of the pagans
are all evil, because they are not gods, but evil spirits), or
whether, as Labeo thinks, a distinction is made between the
offerings presented to the different gods the Greeks are equally
justified in honoring alike the priests by whom the sacrifices are
offered, and the players by whom the dramas are acted, that they
may not be open to the charge of doing an injury to all their gods,
if the plays are pleasing to all of them, or (which were still
worse) to their good gods, if the plays are relished only by
them.
102
Labeo, a jurist of the time of
Augustus, learned in law and antiquities, and the author of several
works much prized by his own and some succeeding ages. The two
articles in Smith’s Dictionary on Antistius and Cornelius Labeo
should be read.
103
Lectisternia
, feasts in which the images of the gods were laid on
pillows in the streets, and all kinds of food set before
them.