Testimonia

Publiek archief van verzamelde en verwerkte bronrecords.
Overzicht / Records / record

source-document-spine-text

Technische verwerking bevestigt geen inhoudelijke beoordeling of toestemming voor openbare publicatie.

record_key: b6458d5a45ee8ae706f48eafa4255523ffd8797923e93b2f9200483e0a6a39f7
origineel ID: epub:0ebf1fc0b18d41d74ee3ad5344e184dd6f094e292aeec3e437cc5a66687e1e15:OEBPS/anf05.iii.iii.v.xxiv.html:187 · verwerkingsstatus: Verwerkt, inhoudelijk nog niet beoordeeld · teksthash: 7ab4aaa7636237cee95fea07c4e517e4fd55531c8e8c67d6425329d14907d34e · 1,647 tekens

Tekst tekstblob openen

Chapter XXIII.—The Heresy of Theodotus. But there was a certain Theodotus, 889 a native of Byzantium, who introduced a novel heresy. He announces tenets concerning the originating cause of the universe, which are partly in keeping with the doctrines of the true Church, in so far as he acknowledges that all things were created by God. Forcibly appropriating, however, (his notions of) Christ from the school of the Gnostics, and of Cerinthus and Ebion, he alleges that (our Lord) appeared in some such manner as I shall now describe. (According to this, Theodotus maintains) that Jesus was a (mere) man, born of a virgin, according to the counsel of the Father, and that after he had lived promiscuously with all men, and had be come pre-eminently religious, he subsequently at his baptism in Jordan received Christ, who came from above and descended (upon him) in form of a dove.  And this was the reason, (according to Theodotus,) why (miraculous) powers did not operate within him prior to the manifestation in him of that Spirit which descended, (and) which proclaims him to be the Christ. But (among the followers of Theodotus) some are disposed (to think) that never was this man made God, (even) at the descent of the Spirit; whereas others (maintain that he was made God) after the resurrection from the dead. 889     See [vol. iii. p. 654, “two Theodoti”] Tertullian, Præscript ., c. liii.; Eusebius, Hist. Ecclesiast , v. 27; Epiphanius, Hær ., liv.; and Theodoret, Hær. Fab ., ii. 5. Clemens Alexandrinus seems to have been greatly indebted to Theodotus, whose system he has explained and commented upon.

Versies (1)

Versie 9e54bd1a550d4f5639ffbd7f600f23466e4410edbd6f8809258b11bb16b95110
{"document_sequence_index":187,"footnote_boundaries_verified":false,"manifest_attributes":{"href":"anf05.iii.iii.v.xxiv.html","id":"iii.iii.v.xxiv","media-type":"application/xhtml+xml"},"manifest_membership_explicit":true,"member_sha256":"308e1d9dbab37bf49c928e0bca8067f87dcb4dcbd6fd05015b56f909981cb523","native_document_header_ref":{"header_context_sha256":"4ac9d6cfcfe928336fabf4720a7b2159c8a97a5da4dc7ef678188c7a61f7998c","source_sha256":"0ebf1fc0b18d41d74ee3ad5344e184dd6f094e292aeec3e437cc5a66687e1e15"},"native_manifest_id":"iii.iii.v.xxiv","native_markup_encoding_recipe":{"BOM_preserved_as_Unicode_codepoint":false,"codec":"utf-8","decoded_UTF8_sha256":"308e1d9dbab37bf49c928e0bca8067f87dcb4dcbd6fd05015b56f909981cb523","exact_original_byte_inverse_verified":true,"original_byte_sha256":"308e1d9dbab37bf49c928e0bca8067f87dcb4dcbd6fd05015b56f909981cb523","original_bytes":6641,"selection_basis":"native-declaration"},"native_member":"OEBPS/anf05.iii.iii.v.xxiv.html","nonspine_content_remaining":false,"reader_route":"native-manifest","record_kind":"native-EPUB-spine-document","semantic_admission":false,"source_sha256":"0ebf1fc0b18d41d74ee3ad5344e184dd6f094e292aeec3e437cc5a66687e1e15","spine_attributes":{"idref":"iii.iii.v.xxiv"},"spine_index":187}

references: [] | work_id: | origin: native-EPUB-spine-unreviewed | source:

Plaatsingen (1)

OrdinalInputVersie
spine:187:OEBPS/anf05.iii.iii.v.xxiv.html123379e54bd1a550d4f5639ffbd7f600f23466e4410edbd6f8809258b11bb16b95110

Bijbelverwijzingen (0)

CoördinaatReferentie

Live-status (1)

Live IDStatusMatchesSchema
epub:0ebf1fc0b18d41d74ee3ad5344e184dd6f094e292aeec3e437cc5a66687e1e15:OEBPS/anf05.iii.iii.v.xxiv.html:187processed_not_found_in_observed_live0