τρεῖς ὑποστάσεις. This expression is a link between this tract and the Expositio (§2), and is one of the indications it bears of an early date. At this time we see that Athanasius speaks of Three ‘Hypostases,’ but qualifies his language by the caveat (Expos. 2) that they are not μεμερισμέναι. In this he follows his Origenist predecessor Dionysius, and the language of the present passage is that of Basil or the Gregories. But it is not the language of Athan. himself in his later years. See above, Prolegg. ch. ii. §3 (2) b, and Introd. to Tom. ad Ant. and to Ad Afr.
{"context":{"$text_sha256":"546270d08bb6a9a97c46a6a4ba9e86dc1a89fcb6137c31b171f833c3dc8fae95"},"context_xpath":"/ThML/ThML.body/div1[11]/div2[2]/div3[6]/p[2]","kind":"whole-historical-note","source_family":"athanasius-bounded-remainder","title":"Illud Omnia, &c. (On Luke x. 22.)","work":"xi.ii","xpath":"/ThML/ThML.body/div1[11]/div2[2]/div3[6]/p[2]/note"}