Cf. Soz. iii. 18. The heretical party, starting with the notion in which their heresy in all its shades consisted, that the Son was a distinct being from the Father, concluded that ‘like in essence’ was the only term which would express the relation of the Son to the Father. Here then the word ‘coessential’ did just enable the Catholics to join issue with them, as exactly expressing what the Catholics wished to express, viz. that there was no such distinction between Them as made the term ‘like’ necessary, but that as material parent and offspring are individuals under one common species, so the Eternal Father and Son are Persons under one common individual essence.
{"context":{"$text_sha256":"90fe9bc4f512ce20908941277ba4ea2b8d4820a4c9e13f25bde34befbe9095dd"},"context_xpath":"/ThML/ThML.body/div1[22]/div2[2]/div3[3]/p[15]","kind":"whole-historical-note","source_family":"athanasius-bounded-remainder","title":"On the Councils of Ariminum and Seleucia. (De Synodis.)","work":"xxii.ii","xpath":"/ThML/ThML.body/div1[22]/div2[2]/div3[3]/p[15]/note[2]"}