Testimonia

Publiek archief van verzamelde en verwerkte bronrecords.
Overzicht / Records / record

source-document-page-text

Technische verwerking bevestigt geen inhoudelijke beoordeling of toestemming voor openbare publicatie.

record_key: b0b34919bf788925a58a0b22daa209f633c35377cf14cdf6c240862a9fe204c0
origineel ID: pdf:6b83a83116e840c669a96618b388a3e6a609b994fd5f4dfa79c30bc624f411c1:page:777 · verwerkingsstatus: Verwerkt, inhoudelijk nog niet beoordeeld · teksthash: e28a0c2e0f5b62d0ebd8f0a1354fbfc6907f72d21a25be55c35c797a372f006f · 2,192 tekens

Tekst tekstblob openen

Chapter VI.—Further disagreements between Plato and Aristotle. And that these very wonderful sages of yours do not even agree in other respects, can be easily learned from this. For while Plato says that there are three first principles of all things, God, and matter, and form,—God, the maker of all; and matter, which is the subject of the first production of all that is produced, and affords to God opportunity for His 276 workmanship; and form, which is the type of each of the things produced,— Aristotle makes no mention at all of form as a first principle, but says that there are two, God and matter. And again, while Plato says that the highest God and the ideas exist in the first place of the highest heavens, and in fixed sphere, Aristotle says that, next to the most high God, there are, not ideas, but certain gods, who can be perceived by the mind. Thus, then, do they differ concerning things heavenly. So that one can see that they not only are unable to understand our earthly matters, but also, being at variance among themselves regarding these things, they will appear unworthy of credit when they treat of things heavenly. And that even their doctrine regarding the human soul as it now is does not harmonize, is manifest from what has been said by each of them concerning it. For Plato says that it is of three parts, having the faculty of reason, of affection, and of appetite.763 But Aristotle says that the soul is not so comprehensive as to include also corruptible parts, but only reason. And Plato loudly maintains that “the whole soul is immortal.” But Aristotle, naming it “the actuality,”764 would have it to be mortal, not immortal. And the former says it is always in motion; but Aristotle says that it is immoveable, since it must itself precede all motion. 763 τὸ λογικόν τὸ θυμικόν, τὸ ἐπιθυμητικόν, —corresponding to what we roughly speak of as reason, the heart, and the appetites. 764 ἐντελέχεια, —the completion or actuality to which each thing, by virtue of its peculiar nature (or poten- tiality, δύναμις), can arrive. Chapter VI.—Further disagreements between Plato and Aristotle. 735 Chapter VI.—Further disagreements between Plato and Aristotle.

Versies (1)

Versie f0c81d7539cd7174d3591c3581fef500086e6af529732fca1bfbc7a49b550582
{"cropbox":["0","0","612","792"],"footnote_boundaries_verified":false,"mediabox":["0","0","612","792"],"native_document_header_ref":{"header_context_sha256":"5ce38dac84fab501d93c581997c90313eb25042e8e442c201a4d80e4bdaeefb0","source_sha256":"6b83a83116e840c669a96618b388a3e6a609b994fd5f4dfa79c30bc624f411c1"},"native_page":{"object_generation":0,"object_number":8236,"page_index_zero_based":777},"reading_order":"pypdf-plain-extraction-with-native-visitor-matrices","record_kind":"derived-native-PDF-page-text","rotation":0,"semantic_admission":false,"source_sha256":"6b83a83116e840c669a96618b388a3e6a609b994fd5f4dfa79c30bc624f411c1","text_layer_empty":false,"text_layer_error":null}

references: [] | work_id: | origin: derived-PDF-page-text-unreviewed | source:

Plaatsingen (1)

OrdinalInputVersie
page:77745909f0c81d7539cd7174d3591c3581fef500086e6af529732fca1bfbc7a49b550582

Bijbelverwijzingen (0)

CoördinaatReferentie

Live-status (0)

Live IDStatusMatchesSchema