Chapter 18.—Of Earthly Bodies,
Which the Philosophers Affirm Cannot Be in Heavenly Places, Because
Whatever is of Earth is by Its Natural Weight Attracted to
Earth.
But it is necessary, they say, that
the natural weight of earthly bodies either keeps them on earth or
draws them to it; and therefore they cannot be in heaven. Our
first parents were indeed on earth, in a well-wooded and fruitful
spot, which has been named Paradise. But let our adversaries a
little more carefully consider this subject of earthly weight,
because it has important bearings, both on the ascension of the
body of Christ, and also on the resurrection body of the saints.
If human skill can by some contrivance fabricate vessels that
float, out of metals which sink as soon as they are placed on the
water, how much more credible is it that God, by some occult mode
of operation, should even more certainly effect that these earthy
masses be emancipated from the downward pressure of their weight?
This cannot be impossible to that God by whose almighty will,
according to Plato, neither things born perish, nor things composed
dissolve, especially since it is much more wonderful that spiritual
and bodily essences be conjoined than that bodies be adjusted to
other material substances. Can we not also easily believe that
souls, being made perfectly blessed, should be endowed with the
power of moving their earthy but incorruptible bodies as they
please, with almost spontaneous movement, and of placing them where
they please with the readiest action? If the angels transport
whatever terrestrial creatures they please from any place they
please, and convey them whither they please, is it to be believed
that they cannot do so without toil and the feeling of burden?
Why, then, may we not believe that the spirits of the saints, made
perfect and blessed by divine grace, can carry their own bodies
where they please, and set them where they will? For, though we
have been accustomed to notice, in bearing weights, that the larger
the quantity the greater the weight of earthy bodies is, and that
the greater the weight the more burdensome it is, yet the soul
carries the members of its own flesh with less difficulty when they
are massive with health, than in sickness when they are wasted.
And though the hale and strong man feels heavier to other men
carrying him than the lank and sickly, yet the man himself moves
and carries his own body with less feeling of burden when he has
the greater bulk of vigorous health, than when his frame is reduced
to a minimum by hunger or disease. Of such consequence, in
estimating the weight of earthly bodies, even while yet corruptible
and mortal, is the consideration not of dead weight, but of the
healthy equilibrium of the parts. And what words can tell the
difference between what we now call health and future
immortality? Let not the philosophers, then, think to upset our
faith with arguments from the weight of bodies; for I don’t care
to inquire why they cannot believe an earthly body can be in
heaven, while the whole earth is suspended on nothing. For
perhaps the world keeps its central place by the same law that
attracts to its centre all heavy bodies. But this I say, if the
lesser gods, to whom Plato committed the creation of man and the
other terrestrial creatures, were able, as he affirms, to withdraw
from the fire its quality of burning, while they left it that of
lighting, so that it should shine through the eyes; and if to the
supreme God Plato also concedes the power of preserving from death
things that have been born, and of preserving from dissolution
things that are composed of parts so different as body and
spirit;—are we to hesitate to concede to this same God the power
to operate on the flesh of him whom He has endowed with
immortality, so as to withdraw its corruption but leave its nature,
remove its burdensome weight but retain its seemly form and
members? But concerning our belief in the resurrection of the
dead, and concerning their immortal bodies, we shall speak more at
large, God willing, in the end of this work.