Technische verwerking bevestigt geen inhoudelijke beoordeling of toestemming voor openbare publicatie.
Versie 3af45014d40516703797c0fa59eea0f2910c23031298d165262b0f5c9565b0aa
{"author":null,"canonical_references":[],"database_sha256":"8cfbe7284c6936871d57c02dc6aa63ebbdfd4722422d539dd9f716e46e91112e","date_end":null,"date_start":null,"edition_year":null,"id":"sermonindex-ecf-3935","native_reference":{"book_number":50,"chapter_from":24,"chapter_to":24,"system":"MyBible module coordinates (mapping unverified)","verse_from":1,"verse_to":1},"public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"verse-keyed-module-record","review_required":["English edition and exact text","author/work attribution","dating","verse mapping and citation kind","reuse and attribution","split author quotations and deduplicate"],"review_status":"unreviewed","source_html":"<p><b>Augustine of Hippo</b>: The Lord explains the intention of the law, which required a bill of divorce in every case where a wife was put away. The precept not to put away a wife is the opposite of saying that a man may put away his wife if he pleases, which is not what the law says. On the contrary, to prevent the wife from being put away, the law required this intermediate step, that the eagerness for separation might be checked by the writing of this bill and the man might have time to think of the evil of putting away his wife.<br/><i>— AGAINST FAUSTUS, A MANICHAEAN 19.26</i></p>","source_html_sha256":"8c2236ccc0f391cd6429e6836a2737eeaad2eac0180ab3bbcf2c705e6a241b6f","source_module":"ECF","source_row_id":3935,"source_url":"https://www.sermonindex.net/commentary/ecf/","text_sha256":"809e2458460144ee3f6218209a47e6bd5c65b36e570cd2f8a892fdf5646dbc67","translator":null,"work":null}references: [] | work_id: | origin: existing-private-derived-record | source: https://www.sermonindex.net/commentary/ecf/