Chapter 4.—That from the
Disputation of Varro, It Follows that the Worshippers of the Gods
Regard Human Things as More Ancient Than Divine Things.
In this whole series of most
beautiful and most subtle distributions and distinctions, it will
most easily appear evident from the things we have said already,
and from what is to be said hereafter, to any man who is not, in
the obstinacy of his heart, an enemy to himself, that it is vain to
seek and to hope for, and even most impudent to wish for eternal
life. For these institutions are either the work of men or of
demons,—not of those whom they call good demons, but, to speak
more plainly, of unclean, and, without controversy, malign spirits,
who with wonderful slyness and secretness suggest to the thoughts
of the impious, and sometimes openly present to their
understandings, noxious opinions, by which the human mind grows
more and more foolish, and becomes unable to adapt itself to and
abide in the immutable and eternal truth, and seek
to confirm
these opinions by every kind of fallacious attestation in their
power. This very same Varro testifies that he wrote first
concerning human things, but afterwards concerning divine things,
because the states existed first, and afterward these things were
instituted by them. But the true religion was not instituted by
any earthly state, but plainly it established the celestial city.
It, however, is inspired and taught by the true God, the giver of
eternal life to His true worshippers.
The following is the reason Varro
gives when he confesses that he had written first concerning human
things, and afterwards of divine things, because these divine
things were instituted by men:—“As the painter is before the
painted tablet, the mason before the edifice, so states are before
those things which are instituted by states.” But he says that
he would have written first concerning the gods, afterwards
concerning men, if he had been writing concerning the whole nature
of the gods,—as if he were really writing concerning some portion
of, and not all, the nature of the gods; or as if, indeed, some
portion of, though not all, the nature of the gods ought not to be
put before that of men. How, then, comes it that in those three
last books, when he is diligently explaining the certain, uncertain
and select gods, he seems to pass over no portion of the nature of
the gods? Why, then, does he say, “If we had been writing on
the whole nature of the gods, we would first have finished the
divine things before we touched the human?” For he either
writes concerning the whole nature of the gods, or concerning some
portion of it, or concerning no part of it at all. If concerning
it all, it is certainly to be put before human things; if
concerning some part of it, why should it not, from the very nature
of the case, precede human things? Is not even some part of the
gods to be preferred to the whole of humanity? But if it is too
much to prefer a part of the divine to all human things, that part
is certainly worthy to be preferred to the Romans at least. For
he writes the books concerning human things, not with reference to
the whole world, but only to Rome; which books he says he had
properly placed, in the order of writing, before the books on
divine things, like a painter before the painted tablet, or a mason
before the building, most openly confessing that, as a picture or a
structure, even these divine things were instituted by men. There
remains only the third supposition, that he is to be understood to
have written concerning no divine nature, but that he did not wish
to say this openly, but left it to the intelligent to infer; for
when one says “
not all
,” usage understands that to mean
“
some
,” but it
may
be understood as meaning
none
, because that which is
none
is neither all nor
some. In fact, as he himself says, if he had been writing
concerning all the nature of the gods, its due place would have
been before human things in the order of writing. But, as the
truth declares, even though Varro is silent, the divine nature
should have taken precedence of Roman things, though it were not
all
, but only
some
. But it is properly put after,
therefore it is
none
. His arrangement, therefore, was due,
not to a desire to give human things priority to divine things, but
to his unwillingness to prefer false things to true. For in what
he wrote on human things, he followed the history of affairs; but
in what he wrote concerning those things which they call divine,
what else did he follow but mere conjectures about vain things?
This, doubtless, is what, in a subtle manner, he wished to signify;
not only writing concerning divine things after the human, but even
giving a reason why he did so; for if he had suppressed this, some,
perchance, would have defended his doing so in one way, and some in
another. But in that very reason he has rendered, he has left
nothing for men to conjecture at will, and has sufficiently proved
that he preferred men to the institutions of men, not the nature of
men to the nature of the gods. Thus he confessed that, in writing
the books concerning divine things, he did not write concerning the
truth which belongs to nature, but the falseness which belongs to
error; which he has elsewhere expressed more openly (as I have
mentioned in the fourth book
239
), saying that, had he been founding
a new city himself, he would have written according to the order of
nature; but as he had only found an old one, he could not but
follow its custom.
239
Ch. 31.