2.  But a further rumour has reached me that you are in Antioch, and are transacting the business in hand with the chief authorities.  And, besides this, I have heard that the brethren who are of the party of Paulinus are entering on some discussion with your excellency on the subject of union with us; and by “us” I mean those who are supporters of the blessed man of God, Meletius. On the divisions of Antioch, cf. Theod., H.E. iii. 2.  Basil was no doubt taking the wise course in supporting Meletius, whose personal orthodoxy was unimpeachable.  But the irreconcilable Eustathians could not forgive him his Arian nomination.  I hear, moreover, that the Paulinians are carrying about a letter of the Westerns, This description might apply to either of the two letters written by Damasus to Paulinus on the subject of the admission to communion of Vitalius, bishop of the Apollinarian schism at Antioch.  (Labbe. Conc. ii. 864 and 900, and Theod. H.E. v. ii.)  The dates may necessitate its being referred to the former. assigning to them the episcopate of the Church in Antioch, but speaking under a false impression of Meletius, the admirable bishop of the true Church of God.  I am not astonished at this.  They i.e. the Westerns. are totally ignorant of what is going on here; the others, though they might be supposed to know, give an account to them in which party is put before truth; and it is only what one might expect that they should either be ignorant of the truth, or should even endeavour to conceal the reasons which led the blessed Bishop Athanasius to write to Paulinus.  But your excellency has on the spot those who are able to tell you accurately what passed between the bishops in the reign of Jovian, and from them I beseech you to get information. cf. Letter cclviii. and the Prolegomena to Athanasius in this edition, p. lxi.  The events referred to took place in the winter of 363, when Athanasius was at Antioch, and in the early part of 364 on his return to Alexandria.  I accuse no one; I pray that I may have love to all, and “especially unto them who are of the household of faith;” Gal. vi. 10. and therefore I congratulate those who have received the letter from Rome.  And, although it is a grand testimony in their favour, I only hope it is true and confirmed by facts.  But I shall never be able to persuade myself on these grounds to ignore Meletius, or to forget the Church which is under him, or to treat as small, and of little importance to the true religion, the questions which originated the division.  I shall never consent to give in, merely because somebody is very much elated at receiving a letter from men. St. Basil seems quite unaware of any paramount authority in a letter from Rome.  cf. Prolegomena.  Even if it had come down from heaven itself, but he does not agree with the sound doctrine of the faith, I cannot look upon him as in communion with the saints.