Versie 096b0d6a618934e8f8de04b32d90bb7735ce76880f323bdf74859517da0751b8
{"author":null,"backreferences":[{"context_html":"<p>25. Here we are warned once more to inquire why he\r\nsays, \"Except, of course, those who have been originally\r\nbaptized in the Catholic Church.\" Is it because they had not\r\nlost what they had before received? Why then could they\r\nnot also transmit outside the Church what they were able to\r\npossess outside? Is it that outside it is unlawfully transmitted?\r\nBut neither is it lawfully possessed outside, and\r\nyet it is possessed; so it is unlawfully given outside, but yet\r\nit is given. But what is given to the person returning from<span class=\"pagenum\"><a id=\"Page_169\">[Pg 169]</a></span>\r\nheresy who had been baptized inside, is given to the person\r\ncoming to the Church who had been baptized outside,—that is,\r\nthat he may have lawfully inside what before he had unlawfully\r\noutside. But perhaps some one may ask what was\r\nsaid on this point in the letter of the blessed Cyprian to\r\nStephen, which is mentioned in this judgment, though not in\r\nthe opening address to the Council,—I suppose because it was\r\nnot considered necessary. For Crescens stated that the letter\r\nitself had been read in the assembly, which I have no doubt\r\nwas done, if I am not mistaken, as is customary, in order that\r\nthe bishops, being already assembled, might receive some\r\ninformation at the same time on the subject contained in\r\nthat letter. For it certainly has no bearing on the present\r\nsubject; and I am more surprised at Crescens having thought\r\nfit to mention it at all, than at its having been passed over\r\nin the opening address. But if any one thinks that I have\r\nshrunk from bringing forward something which has been\r\nurged in it that is essential to the present point, let him read\r\nit and see that what I say is true; or if he finds it otherwise,\r\nlet him convict me of falsehood. For that letter contains\r\nnothing whatsoever about baptism administered among\r\nheretics or schismatics, which is the subject of our present\r\nargument.<a id=\"FNanchor_444_444\"></a><a class=\"fnanchor pginternal\" href=\"#Footnote_444_444\">[444]</a></p>","headings":["WRITINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DONATIST CONTROVERSY.","BOOK SIXTH."],"marker_anchor":null,"paragraph_id":"pg45843-paragraph-226"}],"canonical_references":[],"date_end":null,"date_start":null,"deduplication_fingerprint":"c4ebc0fa5db5f26b044676c21efa5f233559d92629fe59ec12382ed08ee35281","edition_title":"Writings in Connection with the Donatist Controversy","edition_translators":["John Richard King"],"edition_year":1872,"explicit_reference_candidates":[],"headings":[],"id":"pg45843-Footnote_444_444","license_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html","public_import_allowed":false,"record_kind":"original-editor-translator-note","review_required":["work and recension attribution","original-work chronology","Bible reference numbering and citation kind","English edition rights and attribution"],"review_status":"needs_review","rights_evidence":"Provider catalog reports public domain in the USA. Title leaves identify J. R. King, T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1872; catalog identifies translator John Richard King (1835-1907). Gutenberg credits Internet Archive/American Libraries without an exact scan identifier. Full provider license preserved with acquired original; republication and per-work metadata remain unreviewed.","source_anchor":"Footnote_444_444","source_ebook":45843,"source_html":"<div class=\"footnote\">\n<p><a id=\"Footnote_444_444\"></a><a class=\"pginternal\" href=\"#FNanchor_444_444\"><span class=\"label\">[444]</span></a> There are two letters extant from Cyprian to Stephen, No. 68, respecting\r\nMarcianus of Arles, who had joined Novatian, and No. 72, on a Council concerning\r\nheretical baptism. It is clear, however, from <i>Ep.</i> lxxiii. sec. 1, that\r\nthis Council, and consequently the letter to Stephen, was subsequent to the\r\nCouncil under consideration; and consequently Augustine is right in ignoring\r\nit, and referring solely to the former. Dr. Routh thinks the words an interpolation,\r\nof course before Augustine's time; and they may perhaps have been\r\ninserted by some one who had Cyprian's later letter to Stephen before his mind.</p></div>","source_sha256":"a7a04003f4d3c49eb73db6c5936713979fcecadd86884373a9914ac54373ac5b","source_url":"https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/45843/pg45843-images.html#Footnote_444_444","text_sha256":"bb58ab18a28c1ed45f8201260c698d675017acb4856682e90b53d580dac103eb","verified":false,"work_id":null}references: [] | work_id: | origin: existing-private-derived-record | source: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/45843/pg45843-images.html#Footnote_444_444