Letter
XVII
201
.
To All the Bishops of
Sicily.
(Forbidding the sale of church property except for the
advantage of the church).
Leo, the pope
202
, to all the
bishops of Sicily.
The occasion of specific complaints claims our attention
as having “the care of all the churches,” that we should
make a perpetual decree precluding all bishops from adopting as a
practice what in two churches of your province has been unscrupulously
suggested and wrongfully carried out. Upon the clergy of the
church in Tauromenium deploring the destitution they were in from the
bishop having squandered all its estates by selling, giving away, and
otherwise disposing of them, the clergy of Panormus, who have lately
had a new bishop, raised a similar complaint about the misgovernment of
the former bishop in the holy synod, at which we were presiding.
Although, therefore, we have already given instructions as to what is
for the advantage of both Churches, yet lest this vicious example of
abominable plundering should hereafter be taken as a precedent, we wish
to make this our formal command binding on you, beloved, for
ever. We decree, therefore, that no bishop without exception
shall dare to give away, or to exchange, or to sell any of the property
of his church: unless he foresees an advantage likely to accrue
from so doing, and after consultation with the whole of the clergy, and
with their consent he decides upon what will undoubtedly profit that
church. For presbyters, or deacons, or clerics of any rank who
have connived at the churches losses, must know that they will be
deprived of both rank and communion: because it is absolutely
fair, beloved brethren, that not only the bishop, but also the whole of
the clergy should advance the interests of their church and keep the
gifts unimpaired of those who have contributed their own substance to
the churches for the salvation of their souls. Dated 20 Oct., in
the consulship of the illustrious Calepius (447).
201
This letter is
suspected by Quesnel as being, if not spurious, at least the production
of some later Leo than our own: but he would seem to have hardly
sufficient ground for his conjecture and the document is interesting as
showing the existence of Church endowments at the time, and alas! of
their mismanagement. Two centuries before indeed we have Cyprian
in Africa uttering a somewhat similar complaint: e.g.
de
laps
. vi.,
de unit
.
eccl
. xxvi., Lett. XV.
3. It does not appear, however, there that the clergy actually
misappropriated Church funds, only that they were greedy and intent on
worldly gain.
202
Papa
. This
title, which in later times came throughout the West to denote
exclusively the Bishop of Rome, was originally in the West no less than
it is still in the East, the common appellation of all priests and
spiritual fathers of the Church.