Testimonia

Publiek archief van verzamelde en verwerkte bronrecords.
Overzicht / Records / record

source-document-spine-text

Technische verwerking bevestigt geen inhoudelijke beoordeling of toestemming voor openbare publicatie.

record_key: 9116534fb0ba947180c92da094665d3caee457023af3bce93b8d292dd4ff154d
origineel ID: epub:c2c2306a421045fe7606f965a550a1dea500a96d669eb328a0802ef87acb78cb:OEBPS/npnf103.v.v.i.html:645 · verwerkingsstatus: Verwerkt, inhoudelijk nog niet beoordeeld · teksthash: 842c32d5bd4513793d9a0c4eb898e59a90034b1047d63176de7b1b4fd7225c4d · 1,650 tekens

Tekst tekstblob openen

This book appears from its place in the Retractations to have been written about a.d. 395, as it is the last work named in the first book, which contains those which he wrote before he was Bishop. Some editions represent it as addressed to Consentius, but not the mss. The latter are probably right, as his other work on the subject was written in answer to the inquiries of Consentius on the case of the Priscillianists many years later.— Bened. Ed. Retractations , Book I. last Chapter. “I have also written a Book on Lying, which though it takes some pains to understand, contains much that is useful for the exercise of the mind, and more that is profitable to morals, in inculcating the love of speaking the truth. This also I was minded to remove from my works, because it seemed to me obscure, and intricate, and altogether troublesome; for which reason I had not sent it abroad. And when I had afterwards written another book, under this title, Against Lying , much more had I determined and ordered that the former should cease to exist; which however was not done. Therefore in this retractation of my works, as I have found this still in being, I have ordered that it should remain; chiefly because therein are to be found some necessary things which in the other are not. Why the other has for its title, Against Lying , but this, Of Lying , the reason is this, that throughout the one is an open assault upon lying, whereas great part of this is taken up with the discussion of the question for and against. Both, however, are directed to the same object. This book begins thus: “ Magna quæstio est de Mendacio .”

Versies (1)

Versie 32d8f6ff968ca6e1bd4f2ec9675c600d88c46aa1ea74561f42865231f1d99e1e
{"document_sequence_index":645,"footnote_boundaries_verified":false,"manifest_attributes":{"href":"npnf103.v.v.i.html","id":"v.v.i","media-type":"application/xhtml+xml"},"manifest_membership_explicit":true,"member_sha256":"b919b9b052d8a4d081c2cdc556fe2ffdd37d7b76942dca75ddefa11ef78ca13d","native_document_header_ref":{"header_context_sha256":"19cf37ec7d1a22957d2afabdd15beebe26f066e725d9f9a34ef6a0962cf1fbb1","source_sha256":"c2c2306a421045fe7606f965a550a1dea500a96d669eb328a0802ef87acb78cb"},"native_manifest_id":"v.v.i","native_markup_encoding_recipe":{"BOM_preserved_as_Unicode_codepoint":false,"codec":"utf-8","decoded_UTF8_sha256":"b919b9b052d8a4d081c2cdc556fe2ffdd37d7b76942dca75ddefa11ef78ca13d","exact_original_byte_inverse_verified":true,"original_byte_sha256":"b919b9b052d8a4d081c2cdc556fe2ffdd37d7b76942dca75ddefa11ef78ca13d","original_bytes":5989,"selection_basis":"native-declaration"},"native_member":"OEBPS/npnf103.v.v.i.html","nonspine_content_remaining":false,"reader_route":"native-manifest","record_kind":"native-EPUB-spine-document","semantic_admission":false,"source_sha256":"c2c2306a421045fe7606f965a550a1dea500a96d669eb328a0802ef87acb78cb","spine_attributes":{"idref":"v.v.i"},"spine_index":645}

references: [] | work_id: | origin: native-EPUB-spine-unreviewed | source:

Plaatsingen (1)

OrdinalInputVersie
spine:645:OEBPS/npnf103.v.v.i.html1227932d8f6ff968ca6e1bd4f2ec9675c600d88c46aa1ea74561f42865231f1d99e1e

Bijbelverwijzingen (0)

CoördinaatReferentie

Live-status (1)

Live IDStatusMatchesSchema
epub:c2c2306a421045fe7606f965a550a1dea500a96d669eb328a0802ef87acb78cb:OEBPS/npnf103.v.v.i.html:645processed_not_found_in_observed_live0