Testimonia

Publiek archief van verzamelde en verwerkte bronrecords.
Overzicht / Records / record

whole-body-P

Technische verwerking bevestigt geen inhoudelijke beoordeling of toestemming voor openbare publicatie.

record_key: 7e9acfc10080cac2d818ac937272698b8a231bbb0be34e4ec450024f7171c9a2
origineel ID: Hos.ix-p11 · verwerkingsstatus: Verwerkt, inhoudelijk nog niet beoordeeld · teksthash: 7abaef077e571fc289b1a22f0ca95f3b3e613f4951881cc40b0de061a2050d36 · 2,217 tekens

Tekst tekstblob openen

(1.) Whence their gods came. Trace them to their original, and they will be found the creatures of their own fancies and the work of their own hands, v. 6. The calf they worshipped is here called the calf of Samaria, because it is probable that when Samaria, in Ahab's time, became the metropolis of the kingdom, a calf was set up there to be near the court, besides those at Dan and Bethel, or perhaps one of those was removed thither; for those that are for new gods will still be for newer. Now let them consider what this god of theirs owed its rise and being to. [1.] To their own invention and institution: From Israel was it also, not from the God of Israel (he expressly forbade it), but from Israel; it was a device of their own (some think), not borrowed from any of their neighbours, no, not from the Egyptians, for, though they worshipped Apis in a living cow, they never worshipped a golden calf; that was from Israel; it was their own iniquity. Now could that be worthy of their worship which was a contrivance of their own? It was from Israel, that is, the gold and silver of which it was made were collected from the people of Israel by a brief: it was a poor god that was framed by contribution. [2.] It was owing to the skill and labour of the craftsman, Deut. xxvii. 15. The workmen made it, therefore it is not God, v. 6. This is a very cogent conclusive argument, and the inference so very plain that one would think their own thoughts should have suggested it to them, so as to make them ashamed of their idolatry. What can be more absurd than for men to worship that as a god, giving being and good to them, which they themselves gave being to (both matter and form), but could not give life to? A made god is no God. This is a self-evident truth; and yet St. Paul was accused as a criminal for preaching that those are no gods which are made with hands, Acts xix. 26. And, here, this which should have turned them from their idols comes in as a reason why they were inseparably wedded to them; therefore they could not attain to innocency because it was from themselves; they were willing to have gods of their own to do what they pleased with, that they themselves might do what they pleased.

Versies (1)

Versie a5ee9384294ca740cb70fb77ad3be01a91e4aef59b57d8ff577f623a3d61834c
{"chapter_id":"Hos.ix","chapter_title":"Chapter VIII","kind":"whole-body-P","position":11,"unit_key":"Hos.ix-p11","work_key":"Hos","work_title":"Commentary on Hosea","xpath":"/ThML/ThML.body/div1[8]/div2[9]/div[1]/p[10]"}

references: [] | work_id: | origin: provisional-native-whole-unit-document-binding-pending | source:

Plaatsingen (1)

OrdinalInputVersie
line:24769465a5ee9384294ca740cb70fb77ad3be01a91e4aef59b57d8ff577f623a3d61834c

Bijbelverwijzingen (0)

CoördinaatReferentie

Live-status (1)

Live IDStatusMatchesSchema
Hos.ix-p11text_match_identity_requires_check1