50. You say that there are
good men in the human race; and perhaps, if we compare them with the
very wicked, we may be led
3749
to believe that there are. Who
are they, pray? Tell
us
. The philosophers, I
suppose, who
3750
assert that they
alone are most wise, and who have been uplifted with pride from the
meaning attached to this name,
3751
—those, forsooth, who are striving
with their passions every day, and struggling to drive out, to expel
deeply-rooted passions from their minds by the persistent
3752
opposition of
their better qualities; who, that it may be impossible for them to be
led into wickedness at the suggestion of some opportunity, shun
riches
and
inheritances, that they may remove
3753
from themselves occasions of
stumbling; but in doing this, and being solicitous about it, they show
very clearly that
their
souls are, through their weakness, ready
and prone to fall into vice. In our opinion, however, that which
is good naturally, does not require to be either corrected or
reproved;
3754
nay more, it
should not know what evil is, if the nature of each kind would abide in
its own integrity, for neither can two contraries be implanted in each
other, nor can equality be contained in inequality, nor sweetness in
bitterness. He, then, who struggles to amend the inborn depravity
of his inclinations, shows most clearly that he is imperfect,
3755
blameable,
although he may strive with all zeal and
stedfastness.
3749
Lit., “a comparison of the worst may effect that we,”
etc.
3750
So all edd. except Hildebrand, who gives as the reading of the
ms.
,
qui-d
—“what! do
they assert.”
3751
Lit., “by the force of,”
vi
,—an
emendation of Heraldus for the
ms.
in
.
3752
So
most edd., reading
pertinaci
for the
ms.
-ium
—“by the opposition of
persistent virtues,” which is retained in both Roman edd.,
Gelenius, Canterus, Hildebrand, and Oehler.
3753
So
Stewechius and later edd., reading
ut…auferant
,
except Hildebrand, who gives as the
ms.
reading,
et…-unt
—“shun…and
remove,” etc. The first four edd. read
ne…afferant
—“that they may not bring upon
themselves,” etc.
3754
So the
ms.
and first four edd., Orelli
(who, however, seems to have meant to give the other reading), and
Oehler, reading
corri-p-i
, for which the others read
-igi
—“corrected,” except Hildebrand, who
without due reason gives
-rumpi
—“corrupted.”
3755
In the
ms.
imperfectum
is
marked as a gloss, but is retained in all edd., while
improbabilem
is omitted, except in LB., when
im
is
omitted, and
probabilem
joined to the next
clause—“however he may strive to be acceptable,” in
order to provide an object for “strive;” and with a similar
purpose Orelli thrusts in
contrarium
, although it is quite clear
that the verb refers to the preceding clause, “struggles to
amend.”