Versie 14039cdc06b8f09f1ca5e39bdcaa7a815ab8a5257cb1adc21f779b20d365104d
{"author":"Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)","date_end":1887,"date_label":"1887 (historical English edition; transcription printing date uncertain)","date_start":1887,"edition_year":1887,"edition_year_basis":"Original NPNF I V title and imprint 1887; physical transcription printing date uncertain; per-work translator allocation unspecified","id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-85","is_genuine_commentary_verified":false,"license_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Reusing_Wikisource_content","public_import_allowed":true,"publication_location":"source-library","record_type":"editorial-footnote","references":[],"rights_approved":true,"section":"Chapter uncertain; original source section: Augustin's Part in the Controversy, editorial note cite_note-85","semantic_kind_reviewed":false,"source_context":[{"$text_sha256":"f50a4221567290a4e439529dc9915cfac86cb878b1c7489e41f4ca3db05d36a2"}],"source_library_url":"/library/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd/#ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-85","source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy#cite_note-85","translator":"Peter Holmes (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Robert Ernest Wallis (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Benjamin B. Warfield (translation reviser and introduction author), Philip Schaff (series editor)","verification":{"note":{"backlink_hrefs":["#cite_ref-85"],"body_html":{"$text_sha256":"4eeab999fd2c68b1da2bcb60462fee16687c3c518a3bfaaa040c69574181660e"},"body_xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ol/li[85]/span[2]","container_html":{"$text_sha256":"ee209b5127be965985114f5eaed8e6149cba9eea7f7155c85fad998af11b3975"},"container_xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ol/li[85]","id":"cite_note-85"},"original_work_coordinate":{"actual_original_callouts":[{"backlink_href":"#cite_ref-85","nearest_preceding_main_text_book_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_main_text_chapter_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_main_text_section_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_transcription_book_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_transcription_chapter_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_transcription_section_heading":null,"original_callout":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"75ae19a9a24040c1ac17e90bbef1d095f997ab2caa3071c50b28ef3364fa101e"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"75ae19a9a24040c1ac17e90bbef1d095f997ab2caa3071c50b28ef3364fa101e","original_node_id":"cite_ref-85","source_id":"0c811acf6c5d609e56bd","source_path":"raw/research/approved-family-refresh-0045/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd.html","source_sha256":"cf997eba08c583d94ab2a1c7dbebb3a1c8c693a8882c818e1beeb5c30486875c","text":"","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[39]/sup"}}],"ancient_author_assignment_approved":false,"author_assignment_basis":{"historical_author_review":{"native_opening_witnesses":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"9215ebf503bf11bbe4d777dbe1c54f362fe8455a0dfa13e5562a9abb733edb7f"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"9215ebf503bf11bbe4d777dbe1c54f362fe8455a0dfa13e5562a9abb733edb7f","original_node_id":"mwBA","original_text":"III. Augustin’s Part in the Controversy.","tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[1]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551","original_node_id":"mwBg","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"38f20880f3821280fc0e2d0e446194c242300ab3818fa730e71ddc296769a76e"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"ba3dee7faa4fe13507c7a973c53c298ae6ad158c02fbd682beecde3b04f8ba72"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"ba3dee7faa4fe13507c7a973c53c298ae6ad158c02fbd682beecde3b04f8ba72","original_node_id":"mwFw","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"34369a94309a2565a4b7a2857c6c3c180922e61b624d6550fecb2d1dd7e276c5"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[3]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"a7c438932bf3d51a2f0ca1b93e13acc8aa9dac560cc7261025d2dececc7b26f6"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"a7c438932bf3d51a2f0ca1b93e13acc8aa9dac560cc7261025d2dececc7b26f6","original_node_id":"mwSA","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"a184b0701589755f3bc7cd9473ce315637939fcc688e9d918951ce3fa23de9a2"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[4]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"a7287ee62dc5d5a0dd0e3cce7751bd288a6cf2bfc65edcdc7846244947e9c24a"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"a7287ee62dc5d5a0dd0e3cce7751bd288a6cf2bfc65edcdc7846244947e9c24a","original_node_id":"mwaw","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"26361392ed5b2a279b010cf22b1b9d8a984f9392c608c375bafc11fdc9493483"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[5]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"e0dc14e39f6cccf4241e8f25c6d22fee49468ffd9e246c50c75274afb7cd6c3e"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"e0dc14e39f6cccf4241e8f25c6d22fee49468ffd9e246c50c75274afb7cd6c3e","original_node_id":"mwig","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"d314cbc134e821692b9c48f781e288296780ab95096aea1d7cb7a1ca50330c2c"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[6]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"2924e26d62d2c73e8b55034976fc01517937eced30ee8db4e0a3890ae5fb7161"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"2924e26d62d2c73e8b55034976fc01517937eced30ee8db4e0a3890ae5fb7161","original_node_id":"mwpA","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"451687af6f2058febd04520e1c53bb494c4cb3260e61fccc503ba71c16efd627"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[7]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"2ea3a3c0ce52f37118d290b5919136f23159dc84ca1662b68eecfb5156e3d71a"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"2ea3a3c0ce52f37118d290b5919136f23159dc84ca1662b68eecfb5156e3d71a","original_node_id":"mwtA","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"9b4c21fd100554d3fa594df24fdec0031eb64a4a37a685c72848c74a52266d1b"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[8]"}],"original_catalogue_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8","original_node_id":"mwEA","source_id":"26c58fbb5584d760f379","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-volumes/26c58fbb5584d760f379.html","source_sha256":"1c01f465b7c2ccbf882c1ef01b7e5e5a9aa38770a491c117f41200b31549e551","text":"Introductory Essay","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[5]/a"}],"original_catalogue_title":"Introductory Essay","original_edition_author_credit":{"original_text":{"$text_sha256":"4d983dd7da08237256e67b37ffb677ed33924da2e65bfc9f8b493b8da7cd824b"},"sha256":"4d983dd7da08237256e67b37ffb677ed33924da2e65bfc9f8b493b8da7cd824b","source_path":"raw/research/anf-npnf/archive/selectlibraryofn05auguuoft.ocr.txt","source_sha256":"57621031229ccc939004b19b6749e9057fd5990ad188c15e2a4957d8d92f8786","utf8_byte_end":1168,"utf8_byte_start":650},"original_signed_introduction_credits":[{"source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-stage9/3bbaeaf3823fa5604e6e.html","source_sha256":"af20a867fb8540646838301ad6b6525efbac5fed60232e2052d3d94903a24c8e","witness":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6b2e2f044b48ab72632c3bd944148b0e9da7767753154229f781355eb1eb67a8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6b2e2f044b48ab72632c3bd944148b0e9da7767753154229f781355eb1eb67a8","original_text":"by professor benjamin b. warfield, D.D.","tag":"p","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"}},{"source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-stage9/9fd1acb8ac3a8ddfd8fe.html","source_sha256":"8389c3d3c4f4385f89fe18e81830457180f8038ff73fbdbce3e8a340b40b4a94","witness":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"f2514a93be9f4d2e52fd89027532955106edf3603f8c762a49e2a40c930625b8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"f2514a93be9f4d2e52fd89027532955106edf3603f8c762a49e2a40c930625b8","original_text":"by professor benjamin b. warfield, D.D.","tag":"p","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"}}]},"original_body_boundary":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551","original_node_id":"mwBg","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"38f20880f3821280fc0e2d0e446194c242300ab3818fa730e71ddc296769a76e"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"},"original_work_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8","original_node_id":"mwEA","source_id":"26c58fbb5584d760f379","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-volumes/26c58fbb5584d760f379.html","source_sha256":"1c01f465b7c2ccbf882c1ef01b7e5e5a9aa38770a491c117f41200b31549e551","text":"Introductory Essay","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[5]/a"}],"scope":"Qualified historical edition attribution; composition dates and verse exposition unreviewed"},"book_number_approved":false,"book_number_inferred_from_URL":false,"chapter_number_approved":false,"chapter_number_inferred_from_URL":false,"chapter_uncertain":true,"native_paragraph_number_prefix":null,"note_id":"cite_note-85","original_ancestor_location_witnesses":[],"original_main_text_heading_labels":[],"original_page_catalogue_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6a46250ff33eca16c5839001c21c87f1f993d82dcfbd18caae3cae49ba97f661"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6a46250ff33eca16c5839001c21c87f1f993d82dcfbd18caae3cae49ba97f661","original_node_id":"mwDw","source_id":"9fd1acb8ac3a8ddfd8fe","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-stage9/9fd1acb8ac3a8ddfd8fe.html","source_sha256":"8389c3d3c4f4385f89fe18e81830457180f8038ff73fbdbce3e8a340b40b4a94","text":"Augustin's Part in the Controversy","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[3]/a"}],"original_parent_paragraph_witness":null,"original_transcription_heading_labels":[],"original_work_catalogue_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8","original_node_id":"mwEA","source_id":"26c58fbb5584d760f379","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-volumes/26c58fbb5584d760f379.html","source_sha256":"1c01f465b7c2ccbf882c1ef01b7e5e5a9aa38770a491c117f41200b31549e551","text":"Introductory Essay","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[5]/a"}],"owner_verified_section_label":"Chapter uncertain; original source section: Augustin's Part in the Controversy","record_type":"editorial-footnote","section_number_approved":false,"section_number_inferred_from_URL":false,"source_author_assignment_approved":false,"source_id":"0c811acf6c5d609e56bd","source_paragraph_index":null,"source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy","work_catalogue_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay"},"reference_proofs":[],"source_id":"0c811acf6c5d609e56bd","source_library_context_witnesses":[{"html":{"$text_sha256":"a6cae00178cf9d70ae44c95574c761fdf7f50bce0eb1e24407126361db02342b"},"html_sha256":"a6cae00178cf9d70ae44c95574c761fdf7f50bce0eb1e24407126361db02342b","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[39]"}],"source_node":{"html":{"$text_sha256":"4eeab999fd2c68b1da2bcb60462fee16687c3c518a3bfaaa040c69574181660e"},"html_sha256":"4eeab999fd2c68b1da2bcb60462fee16687c3c518a3bfaaa040c69574181660e","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ol/li[85]/span[2]"},"source_path":"raw/research/approved-family-refresh-0045/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd.html","source_record_file":"raw/review/source-library-note-batch-0056/original-source-records.jsonl","source_record_file_sha256":"0e9d3cc5bb9b2b9a6ee12dc495f3b45e8a240d546ad19d136ef4b7606a6e7ca4","source_record_id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-85","source_sha256":"cf997eba08c583d94ab2a1c7dbebb3a1c8c693a8882c818e1beeb5c30486875c","text_sha256":"bd3227eee51a82a7f6bf86ffe5147f933770473d0fb7f9592e030bab0496a095","type":"whole-source-library-dom"},"verified":true,"work":"Introductory Essay","work_id":"ws-augustine-antipelagian-npnf1-5-0c811acf6c5d609e56bd"}references: [] | work_id: ws-augustine-antipelagian-npnf1-5-0c811acf6c5d609e56bd | origin: whole-source-proof-version | source: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy#cite_note-85
Versie 3dac55cba746b9c46df26bd77360ebd9564a4134c1e9180f85ca8214a92c7f92
{"author":"Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)","date_end":1887,"date_label":"1887 (historical English edition; transcription printing date uncertain)","date_start":1887,"edition_year":1887,"edition_year_basis":"Original NPNF I V title and imprint 1887; physical transcription printing date uncertain; per-work translator allocation unspecified","id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-85","is_genuine_commentary_verified":false,"license_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Reusing_Wikisource_content","public_import_allowed":true,"publication_location":"source-library","record_type":"editorial-footnote","references":[],"rights_approved":true,"section":"Chapter uncertain; original source section: Augustin's Part in the Controversy, editorial note cite_note-85","semantic_kind_reviewed":false,"source_context":["The second, third, and fourth books deal with the letter to Rufus in a somewhat similar way, the second and third books being occupied with the calumnies brought against the catholics, and the fourth with the claims made by the Pelagians. The second begins by repelling the charge of Manicheism brought against the catholics (1–4), to which the pointed remark is added, that the Pelagians cannot hope to escape condemnation because they are willing to condemn another heresy; and then defends (with less success) the Roman clergy against the charge of prevarication in their dealing with the Pelagians (5–8), in the course of which all that can be said in defence of Zosimus’ wavering policy is said well and strongly. Next the charges against catholic teaching are taken up and answered (9–16), especially the two important accusations that they maintain fate under the name of grace (9–12), and that they make God an “accepter of persons” (13–16). Augustin’s replies to these charges are in every way admirable. The charge of “fate” rests solely on the catholic denial that grace is given according to preceding merits; but the Pelagians do not escape the same charge when they acknowledge that the “fates” of baptized and unbaptized infants do differ. It is, in truth, not a question of “fate,” but of gratuitous bounty; and “it is not the catholics that assert fate under the name of grace, but the Pelagians that choose to call divine grace by the name of ‘fate’” (12). As to “acceptance of persons,” we must define what we mean by that. God certainly does not accept one’s “person” above another’s; He does not give to one rather than to another because He sees something to please Him in one rather than another: quite the opposite. He gives of His bounty to one while giving all their due to all, as in the parable (Matt. xx. 9 sq.). To ask why He does this, is to ask in vain: the apostle answers by not answering (Rom. ix.); and before the dumb infants, who are yet made to differ, all objection to God is dumb. From this point, the book becomes an examination of the Pelagian doctrine of prevenient merit (17–23), concluding that God gives all by grace from the beginning to the end of every process of doing good. 1. He commands the good; 2. He gives the desire to do it; and, 3. He gives the power to do it: and all, of His gratuitous mercy. The third book continues the discussion of the calumnies of the Pelagians against the catholics, and enumerates and answers six of them: viz., that the catholics teach, 1. That the Old-Testament law was given, not to justify the obedient, but to serve as cause of greater sin (2–3); 2. That baptism does not give entire remission of sins, but the baptized are partly God’s and partly the Devil’s (4–5); 3. That the Holy Ghost did not assist virtue in the Old Testament (6–13); 4. That the Bible saints were not holy, but only less wicked than others (14–15); 5. That Christ was a sinner by necessity of His flesh (doubtless, Julian’s inference from the doctrine of race-sin) (16); 6. That men will begin to fulfil God’s commandments only after the resurrection (17–23). Augustin shows that at the basis of all these calumnies lies either misapprehension or misrepresentation; and, in concluding the book, enumerates the three chief points in the Pelagian heresy, with the five claims growing out of them, of which they most boasted, and then elucidates the mutual relations of the three parties, catholics, Pelagians, and Manicheans, with reference to these points, showing that the catholics stand asunder from both the others, and condemn both (24–27). This conclusion is really a preparation for the fourth book, which takes up these five Pelagian claims, and, after showing the catholic position on them all in brief (1–3), discusses them in turn (4–19): viz., the praise of the creature (4–8), the praise of marriage (9), the praise of the law (10–11), the praise of free will (12–16), and the praise of the saints (17–18). At the end, Augustin calls on the Pelagians to cease to oppose the Manicheans, only to fall into as bad heresy as theirs (19); and then, in reply to their accusation that the catholics were proclaiming novel doctrine, he adduces the testimony of Cyprian and Ambrose, both of whom had received Pelagius’ praise, on each of the three main points of Pelagianism (20–32), and then closes with the declaration that the “impious and foolish doctrine,” as they called it, of the catholics, is immemorial truth (33), and with a denial of the right of the Pelagians to ask for a general council to condemn them (34). All heresies do not need an ecumenical synod for their condemnation; usually it is best to stamp them out locally, and not allow what may be confined to a corner to disturb the whole world."],"source_library_url":"/library/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd/#ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-85","source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy#cite_note-85","translator":"Peter Holmes (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Robert Ernest Wallis (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Benjamin B. Warfield (translation reviser and introduction author), Philip Schaff (series editor)","verification":{"proof_file":"raw/review/source-library-note-batch-0056/proof-records.jsonl","proof_file_sha256":"e0df170d421dcd73bd0a76f61768b09f25dd2e36668f01c873ba3f2300ffa8a2","proof_record_id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-85"},"verified":true,"work":"Introductory Essay","work_id":"ws-augustine-antipelagian-npnf1-5-0c811acf6c5d609e56bd"}references: [] | work_id: ws-augustine-antipelagian-npnf1-5-0c811acf6c5d609e56bd | origin: existing-publication-record | source: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy#cite_note-85