Homily
IX.
1 Cor. iii. 12–15
1 Cor. iii. 12–15
If any man build upon this foundation gold, silver,
costly stones, wood, hay, stubble; each man’s work shall be made
manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it is revealed in
fire; and the fire shall prove each man’s work of what sort it
is. If any man’s work abide which he built thereon, he shall
receive a reward. If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall
suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as through
fire.
This
is no small subject of
enquiry which we propose, but rather about things which are of the
first necessity and which all men enquire about; namely, whether
hell fire have any end. For that it hath no end Christ indeed
declared when he said, “Their fire shall not be quenched, and
their worm shall not die.” [
Mark viii. 44, 46, 48
.]
Well: I know that a chill comes over you (
ναρκᾶτε
) on hearing these things; but
what am I to do? For this is God’s own command, continually to
sound these things in your ears, where He says, “Charge this
people; (Fors.
Exod. xix.
10, 20
.
διαμαρτύραι
, Sept. here
διάστειλαι
,) and ordained as we have been unto
the ministry of the word, we must give pain to our hearers, not
willingly but on compulsion. Nay rather, if you will, we shall
avoid giving you pain. For saith He, (
Rom. xiii. 3
, in substance.) “if thou do
that which is good, fear not:” so that it is possible for you
to hear me not only without ill-will, but even with pleasure.
As I said then; that it hath no end, Christ has
declared. Paul also saith, in pointing out the eternity of the
punishment, that the sinners “shall pay the penalty of
destruction, and that for ever” (
2 Thess. i. 9
.) And again, (
1 Cor. vi. 9
.) “Be not deceived; neither
fornicators. nor adulterers, nor effeminate, shall inherit the
kingdom of God.” And also unto the Hebrews he saith, (
Heb. xii. 14
.) “Follow peace with all
men, and the sanctification without which no man shall see the
Lord.” And Christ also, to those who said, “In thy Name we
have done many wonderful works,” saith, “Depart from Me, I know
you not, ye workers of iniquity” (St.
Matt. vii. 22
.) And the virgins too who
were shut out, entered in no more. And also about those who gave
Him no food, He saith, (St.
Matt. xxv. 46
.) “They shall go away into
everlasting punishment.”
[2.] And say not unto me, “where is the rule of
justice preserved entire, if the punishment hath no end?”
Rather, when God doeth any thing, obey His decisions and submit not
what is said to human reasonings. But moreover, how can it be any
thing else than just for one who hath experienced innumerable
blessings from the beginning, and then committed deeds worthy of
punishment, and neither by threat nor benefit improved at all, to
suffer punishment? For if thou enquire what is absolute justice;
it was meet that we should have perished immediately from the
beginning, according to the definition of strict justice. Rather
not even then according to the rule of justice only; for the result
would have had in it kindness too, if we had suffered this also.
For when any one insults him that hath done him no wrong, according
to the rule of justice he suffers punishment: but when it is his
benefactor, who, bound by no previous favor, bestowed innumerable
kindnesses, who alone is the Author of his being, who is God, who
breathed his soul into him, who gave ten thousand gifts of grace,
whose will is to take him up into heaven;—when, I say, such an
one, after so great blessings, is met by insult, daily insult, in
the conduct of the other party; how can that other be thought
worthy of pardon? Dost thou not see how He punished Adam for one
single sin?
“Yes,” you will say; “but He had given him
Paradise and caused him to enjoy much favor.” Nay, surely it is
not all as one, for a man to sin in the enjoyment of security and
ease, and in a state of great affliction. In fact, this is the
dreadful circumstance that thy sins are the sins of one not in any
Paradise but amid the innumerable evils of this life; that thou art
not sobered even by affliction, as though one in prison should
still practise his crime. However, unto thee He hath promised
things yet greater than Paradise. But neither hath He given them
now, least He should unnerve thee in the season of conflicts; nor
hath He been silent about them, lest He should quite cast thee down
with thy labors. As for Adam, he committed but
one sin and brought on himself certain death;
whereas we commit ten thousand transgressions daily. Now if he by
that one act brought on himself so great an evil and introduced
death; what shall not we suffer who continually live in sins, and
instead of Paradise, have the expectation of heaven?
The argument is irksome and pains the hearer: were
it only by my own feelings, I know this. For indeed my heart is
troubled and throbs; and the more I see the account of hell
confirmed, the more do I tremble and shrink through fear. But it
is necessary to say these things lest we fall into hell. What
thou didst receive was not paradise, nor trees and plants, but
heaven and the good things in the heavens. Now if he that had
received less was condemned, and no consideration exempted him,
much more shall we who have sinned more abundantly, and have been
called unto greater things, endure the woes without remedy.
Consider, for example, how long a time, but
for one single sin, our race abides in death. Five thousand
years
52
and more have
passed, and death hath not yet been done away, on account of one
single sin. And we cannot even say that Adam had heard prophets,
that he had seen others punished for sins, and it was meet that he
should have been terrified thereby and corrected, were it only by
the example. For he was at that time first, and alone; but
nevertheless he was punished. But thou canst not have anything of
this sort to advance, who after so many examples art become worse;
to whom so excellent a Spirit hath been vouch-safed, and yet thou
drawest upon thyself not one sin, nor two, nor three, but sins
without number! For do not, because the sin is committed in a
small moment, calculate that therefore the punishment also must be
a matter of a moment. Seest thou not those men, who for a single
theft or a single act of adultery, committed in a small moment of
time, oftentimes have spent their whole life in prisons, and in
mines, struggling with continual hunger and every kind of death?
And there was no one to set them at liberty, or to say, “The
offence took place in a small moment of time; the punishment too
should have its time equivalent to that of the sin.”
[3.] But, “They are men,” some one will say,
“who do these things; as for God, He is loving unto men.”
Now, first of all, not even men do these things in cruelty, but in
humanity. And God Himself, as “He is loving unto men,” in the
same character doth He punish sins. (
Sirac. xvi. 12
.) “For as His mercy is
great, so also is His reproof.” When therefore thou sayest unto
me, “God is loving unto men,” then thou tellest me of so much
the greater reason for punishing: namely, our sinning against
such a Being. Hence also Paul said, (
Heb. x. 31
.) “It is a fearful thing to
fall into the hands of the living God.” Endure I beseech you,
the fiery force of the words, for perhaps—perhaps you will have
some consolation from hence! Who among men can punish as God has
punished? when He caused a deluge and entire destruction of a race
so numerous; and again, when, a little while after, He rained fire
from above, and utterly destroyed them all? What punishment from
men can be like that? Seest thou not that the punishment even in
this world is almost eternal? Four thousand years have passed
away, and the punishment of the Sodomites abideth at its height.
For as His mercy is great, so also is His punishment.
Again: if He had imposed any burdensome or
impossible things, one might perhaps have been able to urge
difficulty of the laws: but if they be extremely easy, what can
we say for our not regarding even these? Suppose thou art unable
to fast or to practice virginity; although thou art able if thou
wilt, and they who have been able are a condemnation to us. But,
however, God hath not used this strictness towards us; neither hath
He enjoined these things nor laid them down as laws, but left the
choice to be at the discretion of the hearers. Nevertheless, thou
art able to be chaste in marriage; and thou art able to abstain
from drunkenness. Art thou unable to empty thyself of all thy
goods? Nay surely thou art able; and they who have done so prove
it. But nevertheless He hath not enjoined this, but hath
commanded not to be rapacious, and of our means to assist those who
are in want. But if a man say, I cannot even be content with a
wife only, he deceiveth himself and reasoneth falsely; and they
condemn him who without a wife lives in chastity. But how, tell
me, canst thou help using abusive words? canst thou not help
cursing? Why, the doing these things is irksome, not the
refraining from them. What excuse then have we for not observing
precepts so easy and light? We cannot name any at all. That the
punishment then is eternal is plain from all that hath been
said.
[4.] But since Paul’s saying appears to some to
tell the other way, come let us bring it forward also and search it
out thoroughly. For having said, “If any man’s work abide
which he hath built thereon, he shall receive a reward; and if any
man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss,” he adds,
“but himself shall be saved, yet so as through fire.” What
shall we
say then to this?
Let us consider first what is “the Foundation,” and what “the
gold,” and what “the precious stones,” and what “the
hay,” and what the “stubble.”
“The Foundation,” then, he hath himself plainly
signified to be Christ, saying, “For other foundation can no man
lay than that which is laid, which,” he saith “is Jesus
Christ.”
Next, the building seems to me to be actions.
Although some maintain that this also is spoken concerning teachers
and disciples and concerning corrupt heresies: but the reasoning
doth not admit it. For if this be it, in what sense, while “the
work is destroyed,” is the “builder” to be “saved,”
though it be “through fire?” Of right, the author ought
rather of the two to perish; but now it will be found that the
severer penalty is assigned to him who hath been built into the
work. For if the teacher was the cause of the wickedness, he is
worthy to suffer severer punishment: how then shall he be
“saved?” If, on the contrary, he was not the cause but the
disciples became such through their own perverseness, he is no whit
deserving of punishment, no, nor yet of sustaining loss: he, I
say, who builded so well. In what sense then doth he say, “he
shall suffer loss?”
From this it is plain that the discourse is about
actions. For since he means next in course to put out his
strength against the man who had committed fornication, he begins
high up and long beforehand to lay down the preliminaries. For he
knew how while discussing one subject, in the very discourse about
that thing to prepare the grounds of another to which he intends to
pass on. For so in his rebuke for not awaiting one another at
their meals, he laid the grounds of his discourse concerning the
mysteries. And also because now he is hastening on towards the
fornicator, while speaking about the “Foundation,” he adds,
“Know ye not that ye are the Temple of God? and that the Spirit
of God dwelleth in you? If any man destroy (
Φθείρη
, rec. version, “defile.”) the Temple
of God, him will God destroy.” Now these things, he said, as
beginning now to agitate with fears the soul of him that had been
unchaste.
[5.]
Ver. 12
. “If any man build upon
this foundation, gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay,
stubble.” For after the faith there is need of edification:
and therefore he saith elsewhere, “Edify one another with these
words.” (perhaps
1
Thes. v. 11; iv. 5
.)
For both the artificer and the learner contribute to the
edifying. Wherefore he saith, “But let every man take heed how
he buildeth thereon.” (
1
Cor. iii. 10
.) But if
faith had been the subject of these sayings, the thing affirmed is
not reasonable. For in the faith all ought to be equal, since
“there is but one faith;” (
Ephes. iv. 5
.) but in goodness of life it
is not possible that all should be the same. Because the faith is
not in one case less, in another more excellent, but the same in
all those who truly believe. But in life there is room for some
to be more diligent, others more slothful; some stricter, and
others more ordinary; that some should have done well in greater
things, others in less; that the errors of some should have been
more grievous, of others less notable. On this account he saith,
“Gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay, stubble,—every man’s
work shall be made manifest:”—his conduct; that is what he
speaks of here:—“If any man’s work abide which he built
thereupon, he shall receive a reward; if any man’s work shall be
burned, he shall suffer loss.” Whereas, if the saying related
to disciples and teachers, he ought not to “suffer loss” for
disciples refusing to hear. And therefore he saith, “Every man
shall receive his own reward according to his own labor” not
according to the result, but according to “the labor.” For
what if the hearers gave no heed? Wherefore this passage also
proves that the saying is about actions.
Now his meaning is this: If any man have an
ill life with a right faith, his faith shall not shelter him from
punishment, his work being burnt up. The phrase, “shall be
burned up,” means, “shall not endure the violence of the
fire.” But just as if a man having golden armor on were to pass
through a river of fire, he comes from crossing it all the
brighter; but if he were to pass through it with hay, so far from
profiting, he destroys himself besides; so also is the case in
regard of men’s works. For he doth not say this as if he were
discoursing of material things being burnt up, but with a view of
making their fear more intense, and of shewing how naked of all
defence he is who abides in wickedness. Wherefore he said, “He
shall suffer loss:” lo, here is one punishment: “but he
himself shall be saved, but so as by fire;” lo, again, here is a
second. And his meaning is, “He himself shall not perish in the
same way as his works, passing into nought, but he shall abide in
the fire.
53
[6.] “He calleth it, however, “Salvation,”
you will say; why, that is the cause of his adding, “so as by
fire:” since we also used to say, “It is preserved in the
fire,” when we speak of those substances which do not immediately
burn up and become ashes. For do not at sound of the word fire
imagine that
those who are
burning pass into annihilation. And though he call such
punishment Salvation, be not astonished. For his custom is in
things which have an ill sound to use fair expressions, and in good
things the contrary. For example, the word “Captivity” seems
to be the name of an evil thing, but Paul has applied it in a good
sense, when he says, “Bringing into captivity every thought to
the obedience of Christ.” (
2 Cor. x. 5
.) And again, to an evil
thing he hath applied a good word, saying, “Sin reigned,”
(
Rom. v. 21
.) here surely the term
“reigning” is rather of auspicious sound. And so here in
saying, “he shall be saved,” he hath but darkly hinted at the
intensity of the penalty: as if he had said, “But himself shall
remain forever in punishment.” He then makes an inference,
saying,
[7.]
Ver. 16
. “Know ye not that ye are
the Temple of God?” For since he had discoursed in the section
before, concerning those who were dividing the Church, he
thenceforward attacks him also who had been guilty of uncleanness;
not indeed as yet in plain terms but in a general way; hinting at
his corrupt mode of life and enhancing the sin, by the Gift which
had been already given to him. Then also he puts all the rest to
shame, arguing from these very blessings which they had already:
for this is what he is ever doing, either from the future or from
the past, whether grievous or encouraging. First, from things
future; “For the day shall declare it, because it is revealed by
fire.” Again, from things already come to pass; “Know ye not
that ye are the Temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwelleth in
you?”
Ver. 17
. “If any man destroy the
Temple of God, him will God destroy.” Dost thou mark the
sweeping vehemence of his words? However, so long as the person
is unknown, what is spoken is not so invidious, all dividing among
themselves the fear of rebuke.
“Him will God destroy,” that is, will cause him
to perish. And this is not the word of one denouncing a curse,
but of one that prophesieth.
“For the Temple of God is holy:” but he that
hath committed fornication is profane.
Then, in order that he might not seem to spend his
earnestness upon that one, in saying, “for the Temple of God is
holy,” he addeth, “which ye are.”
[8.]
Ver. 18
. “Let no man deceive
himself.” This also is in reference to that person, as thinking
himself to be somewhat and flattering himself on wisdom. But that
he might not seem to press on him at great length in a mere
digression; he first throws him into a kind of agony and delivers
him over unto fear, and then brings back his discourse to the
common fault, saying, “If any man among you seemeth to be wise in
this world, let him become a fool, that he may become (
γένηται
. rec. vers. “be.”)
wise.” And this
54
he doth
afterwards with great boldness of speech, as having sufficiently
beaten them down
55
, and shaken
with that fear the mind not of that unclean person only, but of all
the hearers also: so accurately does he measure the reach of what
he has to say. For what if a man be rich, what if he be noble; he
is viler than all the vile, when made captive by sin. For as if a
man were a king and enslaved to barbarians, he is of all men most
wretched, so also is it in regard to sin: since sin is a
barbarian, and the soul which hath been once taken captive she
knoweth not how to spare, but plays the tyrant to the ruin of all
those who admit her.
[9.] For nothing is so inconsiderate as
sin: nothing so senseless, so utterly foolish and outrageous.
All is overturned and confounded and destroyed by it, wheresoever
it may alight. Unsightly to behold, disgusting and grievous.
And should a painter draw her picture
56
, he would not, methinks, err in
fashioning her after this sort. A woman with the form of a beast,
savage, breathing flames, hideous, black; such as the heathen poets
depict their Scyllas. For with ten thousand hands she lays hold
of our thoughts, and comes on unexpected, and tears everything in
pieces, like those dogs that bite slily.
But rather, what need of the painter’s art, when
we should rather bring forward those who are made after sin’s
likeness?
Whom then will ye that we should portray first?
The covetous and rapacious? And what more shameless than those
eyes? What more immodest, more like a greedy dog? For no dog
keeps his ground with such shameless impudence as he when he is
grasping at all men’s goods. What more polluted than those
hands? What more audacious than that mouth, swallowing all down
and not satisfied? Nay, look not on the countenance and the eyes
as being a man’s. For such looks belong not to the eyes of
men. He seeth not men as men; he seeth not the heaven as
heaven. He does not even lift up his head unto the Lord; but all
is money in his account. The eyes of men are wont to look upon
poor persons in affliction, and to be softened; but these of the
rapacious man, at sight of the poor, glare like wild beasts’.
The eyes of men do not behold other men’s goods as if they were
their own, but rather their
own
as others; and they covet not the things given to others, but
rather exhaust upon others their own means: but these are not
content unless they take all men’s property. For it is not a
man’s eye which they have, but a wild beast’s. The eyes of
men endure not to see their own body stripped of clothing, (for it
is their own, though in person it belong to others,) but these,
unless they strip every one and lodge all men’s property in their
own home, are never cloyed; yea rather they never have enough.
Insomuch that one might say that their hands are not wild beasts’
only, but even far more savage and cruel than these. For bears
and wolves when they are satiated leave off their kind of eating:
but these know not any satiety. And yet for this cause God made
us hands, to assist others, not to plot against them. And if we
were to use them for that purpose, better had they been cut off and
we left without them. But thou, if a wild beast rend a sheep, art
grieved; but when doing the same unto one of thine own flesh and
blood, thinkest thou that thy deed is nothing atrocious? How then
canst thou be a man? Seest thou not that we call a thing humane,
when it is full of mercy and loving-kindness? But when a man doth
any thing cruel or savage, inhuman is the title we give to such a
one. You see then that the stamp of man as we portray him is his
showing mercy; of a beast the contrary; according to constant
saying, “Why, is a man a wild beast, or a dog?” (vid.
2 Kings viii. 13
.) For men relieve poverty;
they do not aggravate it. Again these men’s mouths are the
mouths of wild beasts; yea rather these are the fiercer of the
two. For the words also, which they utter, emit poison, more than
the wild beasts’ teeth, working slaughter. And if one were to
go through all particulars, one should then see clearly how
inhumanity turns those who practise it from men into beasts.
[10.] But were he to search out the mind also of
that sort of people, he would no longer call them beasts only, but
demons. For first, they are full of great cruelty and of hatred
against their “fellow-servant: (St.
Matt. xviii. 33
.) and neither is love of the
kingdom there, nor fear of hell; no reverence for men, no pity, no
sympathy: but shamelessness and audacity, and contempt of all
things to come. And unto them the words of God concerning
punishment seem to be a fable, and His threats mirth. For such is
the mind of the covetous man. Since then within they are demons,
and without, wild beasts; yea, worse than wild beasts; where are we
to place such as they are? For that they are worse even than wild
beasts, is plain from this. The beasts are such as they are by
nature: but these, endowed by nature with gentleness, forcibly
strive against nature to train themselves to that which is
savage. The demons too have the plotters among men to help them,
to such an extent that if they had no such aid, the greater part of
their wiles against us would be done away: but these, when such
as they have spitefully entreated are vying with them, still try to
be more spiteful then they. Again, the devil wages war with man,
not with the demons of his own kind: but he of whom we speak is
urgent in all ways to do harm to his own kindred and family, and
doth not even reverence nature.
I know that many hate us because of these words; but
I feel no hatred towards them; rather I pity and bewail those who
are so disposed. Even should they choose to strike, I would
gladly endure it, if they would but abstain from this their savage
mind. For not I alone, but the prophet also with me, banisheth
all such from the family of men saying, (
Ps. xlix. 20
. Sept.
τοῖς ἀνοήτοις
) “Man being in honor hath no
understanding, but is like unto the senseless beasts.”
Let us then become men at last, and let us look up
unto heaven; and that which is according to His image, (
Colos. iii. 10
.) let us receive and
recover: that we may obtain also the blessings to come through
the grace and loving-kindness of our Lord Jesus Christ, with Whom
to the Father and the Holy Spirit be glory, power, honor, now and
always, and unto everlasting ages. Amen.
52
According to the reckoning of the LXX, in
Gen. 5
. which adding 100 years to the
five first generations, and also to the seventh, and making some
slight difference in the lives of Methuselah and Lamech, brings the
date of the flood to A.M. 2242, and that of our Lord’s birth to
5500.
53
[Few accept this singular explanation. The common view of the
clause is that it means that the man is saved, but as if through
the very flames, i.e., with the greatest difficulty.
1 Pet. iv. 18
. C.]
54
i.e. “reproving them for their common fault.”
55
From this to the end of the sentence is not in Benedictine,
but in Savile’s margin, evidently from some
ms
. It seems to complete the connection of the
sentences. [But Dr. Field omits it.]
56
Compare G. Herbert,
Remains
, p. 110. ed.
1824.