Canon II.
If
any one shall condemn him who
eats flesh, which is without blood and has not been offered to idols
nor strangled, and is faithful and devout, as though the man were
without hope [of salvation] because of his eating, let him be
anathema.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon II.
Anathema also to him who condemns the eating of flesh,
except that of a suffocated animal or that offered to idols.
Hefele.
This canon also, like the preceding one, is not directed
against the Gnostics and Manicheans, but against an unenlightened
hyper-asceticism, which certainly approaches the Gnostic-Manichean
error as to matter being Satanic. We further see that, at the
time of the Synod of Gangra, the rule of the Apostolic Synod with
regard to blood and things strangled was still in force. With the
Greeks,
indeed, it continued always
in force as their Euchologies still show. Balsamon also, the
well-known commentator on the canons of the Middle Ages, in his
commentary on the sixty-third Apostolic Canon, expressly blames the
Latins because they had ceased to observe this command. What the
Latin Church, however, thought on this subject about the year 400, is
shown by St. Augustine in his work
Contra Faustum
, where he
states that the Apostles had given this command in order to unite the
heathens and Jews in the one ark of Noah; but that then, when the
barrier between Jewish and heathen converts had fallen, this command
concerning things strangled and blood had lost its meaning, and was
only observed by few. But still, as late as the eighth century,
Pope Gregory the Third (731) forbade the eating of blood or things
strangled under threat of a penance of forty days.
No one will pretend that the disciplinary enactments of
any council, even though it be one of the undisputed Ecumenical Synods,
can be of greater and more unchanging force than the decree of that
first council, held by the Holy Apostles at Jerusalem, and the fact
that its decree has been obsolete for centuries in the West is proof
that even Ecumenical canons may be of only temporary utility and may be
repealed by disuser, like other laws.
This canon is found in the
Corpus Juris Canonici
,
Gratian’s
Decretum
, Pars I., Dist. XXX., c.
xiii.